Provider Responses to Patients Controlling Access to their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care

被引:26
|
作者
Tierney, William M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alpert, Sheri A. [3 ]
Byrket, Amy [1 ]
Caine, Kelly [3 ,4 ]
Leventhal, Jeremy C. [1 ]
Meslin, Eric M. [3 ]
Schwartz, Peter H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Regenstrief Inst Inc, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Eskenazi Hlth, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Clemson Univ Sch Comp, Clemson, SC USA
关键词
fair information practices; electronic health records; patient preferences; quality of care; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL GOPHER; SYSTEM; EXPERIENCE; NETWORK; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-014-3053-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Applying Fair Information Practice principles to electronic health records (EHRs) requires allowing patient control over who views their data. METHODS: We designed a program that captures patients' preferences for provider access to an urban health system's EHR. Patients could allow or restrict providers' access to all data (diagnoses, medications, test results, reports, etc.) or only highly sensitive data (sexually transmitted infections, HIV/AIDS, drugs/alcohol, mental or reproductive health). Except for information in free-text reports, we redacted EHR data shown to providers according to patients' preferences. Providers could "break the glass" to display redacted information. We prospectively studied this system in one primary care clinic, noting redactions and when users "broke the glass," and surveyed providers about their experiences and opinions. RESULTS: Eight of nine eligible clinic physicians and all 23 clinic staff participated. All 105 patients who enrolled completed the preference program. Providers did not know which of their patients were enrolled, nor their preferences for accessing their EHRs. During the 6-month prospective study, 92 study patients (88 %) returned 261 times, during which providers viewed their EHRs 126 times (48 %). Providers " broke the glass" 102 times, 92 times for patients not in the study and ten times for six returning study patients, all of whom had restricted EHR access. Providers " broke the glass" for six (14 %) of 43 returning study patients with redacted data vs. zero among 49 study patients without redactions (p=0.01). Although 54 % of providers agreed that patients should have control over who sees their EHR information, 58 % believed restricting EHR access could harm provider-patient relationships and 71 % felt quality of care would suffer. CONCLUSIONS: Patients frequently preferred restricting provider access to their EHRs. Providers infrequently overrode patients' preferences to view hidden data. Providers believed that restricting EHR access would adversely impact patient care. Applying Fair Information Practice principles to EHRs will require balancing patient preferences, providers' needs, and health care quality.
引用
收藏
页码:S31 / S37
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Emergency care access to primary care records: an observational study
    Bowden, Thomas
    Lyell, David
    Coiera, Enrico
    BMJ HEALTH & CARE INFORMATICS, 2020, 27 (03)
  • [42] Sepsis recording in primary care electronic health records, linked hospital episodes and mortality records: Population-based cohort study in England
    Rezel-Potts, Emma
    Gulliford, Martin C.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (12):
  • [43] Enhanced invitation methods and uptake of health checks in primary care: randomised controlled trial and cohort study using electronic health records
    McDermott, Lisa
    Wright, Alison J.
    Cornelius, Victoria
    Burgess, Caroline
    Forster, Alice S.
    Ashworth, Mark
    Khoshaba, Bernadette
    Clery, Philippa
    Fuller, Frances
    Miller, Jane
    Dodhia, Hiten
    Rudisill, Caroline
    Conner, Mark T.
    Gulliford, Martin C.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 20 (84) : 1 - +
  • [44] Medical student access to electronic medical records in UK primary care
    Jones, Robert G.
    Mehta, Milan M.
    McKinley, Robert K.
    EDUCATION FOR PRIMARY CARE, 2011, 22 (01) : 4 - 6
  • [45] Are major lower extremity amputations well recorded in primary care electronic health records?: Insights from primary care electronic health records in England
    Meffen, Anna
    Sayers, Robert D.
    Gillies, Clare L.
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    Gray, Laura J.
    PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 23
  • [46] Documentation and Diagnosis of Overweight and Obesity in Electronic Health Records of Adult Primary Care Patients
    Baer, Heather J.
    Karson, Andrew S.
    Soukup, Jane R.
    Williams, Deborah H.
    Bates, David W.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (17) : 1648 - 1652
  • [47] WHAT'S AGE GOT TO DO WITH IT? PROVIDER CHARACTERISTICS AND SATISFACTION WITH ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS AMONG PRIMARY CARE PROVIDERS
    Wilcox, A. R.
    Neri, P. M.
    Lynn, V. A.
    Williams, D. H.
    Ramelson, H. Z.
    Bates, D. W.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 : 218 - 218
  • [48] Risk of mortality and cardiovascular events following macrolide prescription in chronic rhinosinusitis patients: a cohort study using linked primary care electronic health records
    Williamson, Elizabeth
    Denaxas, Spiros
    Morris, Steve
    Clarke, Caroline S.
    Thomas, Mike
    Evans, Hannah
    Direk, Kenan
    Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Arturo
    Little, Paul
    Lund, Valerie
    Blackshaw, Helen
    Schilder, Anne
    Philpott, Carl
    Hopkins, Claire
    Carpenter, James
    RHINOLOGY, 2019, 57 (04) : 252 - 260
  • [49] Cancelled Primary Care Appointments: A Prospective Cohort Study of Diabetic Patients
    McComb, Sara
    Tian, Zhiyi
    Sands, Laura
    Turkcan, Ayten
    Zhang, Lingsong
    Frazier, Shree
    Lawley, Mark
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2017, 41 (04)
  • [50] Cancelled Primary Care Appointments: A Prospective Cohort Study of Diabetic Patients
    Sara McComb
    Zhiyi Tian
    Laura Sands
    Ayten Turkcan
    Lingsong Zhang
    Shree Frazier
    Mark Lawley
    Journal of Medical Systems, 2017, 41