Provider Responses to Patients Controlling Access to their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care

被引:26
|
作者
Tierney, William M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alpert, Sheri A. [3 ]
Byrket, Amy [1 ]
Caine, Kelly [3 ,4 ]
Leventhal, Jeremy C. [1 ]
Meslin, Eric M. [3 ]
Schwartz, Peter H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Regenstrief Inst Inc, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Eskenazi Hlth, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Clemson Univ Sch Comp, Clemson, SC USA
关键词
fair information practices; electronic health records; patient preferences; quality of care; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL GOPHER; SYSTEM; EXPERIENCE; NETWORK; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-014-3053-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Applying Fair Information Practice principles to electronic health records (EHRs) requires allowing patient control over who views their data. METHODS: We designed a program that captures patients' preferences for provider access to an urban health system's EHR. Patients could allow or restrict providers' access to all data (diagnoses, medications, test results, reports, etc.) or only highly sensitive data (sexually transmitted infections, HIV/AIDS, drugs/alcohol, mental or reproductive health). Except for information in free-text reports, we redacted EHR data shown to providers according to patients' preferences. Providers could "break the glass" to display redacted information. We prospectively studied this system in one primary care clinic, noting redactions and when users "broke the glass," and surveyed providers about their experiences and opinions. RESULTS: Eight of nine eligible clinic physicians and all 23 clinic staff participated. All 105 patients who enrolled completed the preference program. Providers did not know which of their patients were enrolled, nor their preferences for accessing their EHRs. During the 6-month prospective study, 92 study patients (88 %) returned 261 times, during which providers viewed their EHRs 126 times (48 %). Providers " broke the glass" 102 times, 92 times for patients not in the study and ten times for six returning study patients, all of whom had restricted EHR access. Providers " broke the glass" for six (14 %) of 43 returning study patients with redacted data vs. zero among 49 study patients without redactions (p=0.01). Although 54 % of providers agreed that patients should have control over who sees their EHR information, 58 % believed restricting EHR access could harm provider-patient relationships and 71 % felt quality of care would suffer. CONCLUSIONS: Patients frequently preferred restricting provider access to their EHRs. Providers infrequently overrode patients' preferences to view hidden data. Providers believed that restricting EHR access would adversely impact patient care. Applying Fair Information Practice principles to EHRs will require balancing patient preferences, providers' needs, and health care quality.
引用
收藏
页码:S31 / S37
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patients' access to their online electronic health records
    Pyper, C
    Amery, J
    Watson, M
    Crook, C
    Thomas, B
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2002, 8 : 103 - 105
  • [22] Characterizing primary care for patients with major depressive disorder using electronic health records of a US-based healthcare provider
    Larson, Sharon
    Nemoianu, Andrei
    Lawrence, Debra F.
    Troup, Melissa A.
    Gionfriddo, Michael R.
    Pousti, Bobak
    Sun, Haiyan
    Riaz, Faisal
    Wagner, Eric S.
    Chrones, Lambros
    Touya, Maelys
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2022, 300 : 377 - 384
  • [23] Antibiotic Prescribing Before and After the Diagnosis of Comorbidity: A Cohort Study Using Primary Care Electronic Health Records
    Rockenschaub, Patrick
    Hayward, Andrew
    Shallcross, Laura
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 71 (07) : E50 - E57
  • [24] Designing a System for Patients Controlling Providers' Access to their Electronic Health Records: Organizational and Technical Challenges
    Leventhal, Jeremy C.
    Cummins, Jonathan A.
    Schwartz, Peter H.
    Martin, Douglas K.
    Tierney, William M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 : S17 - S24
  • [25] Serious bacterial infections and antibiotic prescribing in primary care: cohort study using electronic health records in the UK
    Gulliford, Martin C.
    Sun, Xiaohui
    Charlton, Judith
    Winter, Joanne R.
    Bunce, Catey
    Boiko, Olga
    Fox, Robin
    Little, Paul
    Moore, Michael
    Hay, Alastair D.
    Ashworth, Mark
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (02):
  • [26] Provider Access to Legacy Electronic Anesthesia Records Following Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System
    Richard H. Epstein
    Franklin Dexter
    Eric S. Schwenk
    Journal of Medical Systems, 2019, 43
  • [27] Designing a System for Patients Controlling Providers’ Access to their Electronic Health Records: Organizational and Technical Challenges
    Jeremy C. Leventhal
    Jonathan A. Cummins
    Peter H. Schwartz
    Douglas K. Martin
    William M. Tierney
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2015, 30 : 17 - 24
  • [28] Early Assessment of Health Care Utilization Among a Workforce Population With Access to Primary Care Practices With Electronic Health Records
    De Leon, Samantha F.
    Pauls, Lucas
    Shih, Sarah C.
    Cannell, Thomas
    Wang, Jason J.
    JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 36 (03): : 260 - 268
  • [29] Baseline Characteristics May Help Indicate the Best Choice of Health Care Provider for Back Pain Patients in Primary Care: Results From a Prospective Cohort Study
    Hartvigsen, Lisbeth
    Kongsted, Alice
    Vach, Werner
    Salmi, Louis-Rachid
    Hestbaek, Lise
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 43 (01) : 13 - 23
  • [30] Provider Access to Legacy Electronic Anesthesia Records Following Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System
    Epstein, Richard H.
    Dexter, Franklin
    Schwenk, Eric S.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 43 (05)