Provider Responses to Patients Controlling Access to their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care

被引:26
|
作者
Tierney, William M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alpert, Sheri A. [3 ]
Byrket, Amy [1 ]
Caine, Kelly [3 ,4 ]
Leventhal, Jeremy C. [1 ]
Meslin, Eric M. [3 ]
Schwartz, Peter H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Regenstrief Inst Inc, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Eskenazi Hlth, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Clemson Univ Sch Comp, Clemson, SC USA
关键词
fair information practices; electronic health records; patient preferences; quality of care; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL GOPHER; SYSTEM; EXPERIENCE; NETWORK; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-014-3053-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Applying Fair Information Practice principles to electronic health records (EHRs) requires allowing patient control over who views their data. METHODS: We designed a program that captures patients' preferences for provider access to an urban health system's EHR. Patients could allow or restrict providers' access to all data (diagnoses, medications, test results, reports, etc.) or only highly sensitive data (sexually transmitted infections, HIV/AIDS, drugs/alcohol, mental or reproductive health). Except for information in free-text reports, we redacted EHR data shown to providers according to patients' preferences. Providers could "break the glass" to display redacted information. We prospectively studied this system in one primary care clinic, noting redactions and when users "broke the glass," and surveyed providers about their experiences and opinions. RESULTS: Eight of nine eligible clinic physicians and all 23 clinic staff participated. All 105 patients who enrolled completed the preference program. Providers did not know which of their patients were enrolled, nor their preferences for accessing their EHRs. During the 6-month prospective study, 92 study patients (88 %) returned 261 times, during which providers viewed their EHRs 126 times (48 %). Providers " broke the glass" 102 times, 92 times for patients not in the study and ten times for six returning study patients, all of whom had restricted EHR access. Providers " broke the glass" for six (14 %) of 43 returning study patients with redacted data vs. zero among 49 study patients without redactions (p=0.01). Although 54 % of providers agreed that patients should have control over who sees their EHR information, 58 % believed restricting EHR access could harm provider-patient relationships and 71 % felt quality of care would suffer. CONCLUSIONS: Patients frequently preferred restricting provider access to their EHRs. Providers infrequently overrode patients' preferences to view hidden data. Providers believed that restricting EHR access would adversely impact patient care. Applying Fair Information Practice principles to EHRs will require balancing patient preferences, providers' needs, and health care quality.
引用
收藏
页码:S31 / S37
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Provider Responses to Patients Controlling Access to their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care
    William M. Tierney
    Sheri A. Alpert
    Amy Byrket
    Kelly Caine
    Jeremy C. Leventhal
    Eric M. Meslin
    Peter H. Schwartz
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2015, 30 : 31 - 37
  • [2] Patient Preferences in Controlling Access to Their Electronic Health Records: a Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care
    Peter H. Schwartz
    Kelly Caine
    Sheri A. Alpert
    Eric M. Meslin
    Aaron E. Carroll
    William M. Tierney
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2015, 30 : 25 - 30
  • [3] Patient Preferences in Controlling Access to Their Electronic Health Records: a Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care
    Schwartz, Peter H.
    Caine, Kelly
    Alpert, Sheri A.
    Meslin, Eric M.
    Carroll, Aaron E.
    Tierney, William M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 : S25 - S30
  • [4] Access to electronic health records in primary care - a survey of patients' views
    Pyper, C
    Amery, J
    Watson, M
    Crook, C
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2004, 10 (11): : SR17 - SR22
  • [5] Antibiotic prescribing frequency amongst patients in primary care: a cohort study using electronic health records
    Shallcross, Laura
    Beckley, Nick
    Rait, Greta
    Hayward, Andrew
    Petersen, Irene
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 72 (06) : 1818 - 1824
  • [6] Predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records
    Watson, Jessica
    Salisbury, Chris
    Banks, Jonathan
    Whiting, Penny
    Hamilton, Willie
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 120 (11) : 1045 - 1051
  • [7] Predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records
    Jessica Watson
    Chris Salisbury
    Jonathan Banks
    Penny Whiting
    Willie Hamilton
    British Journal of Cancer, 2019, 120 : 1045 - 1051
  • [8] The risk of cancer in primary care patients with hypercalcaemia: a cohort study using electronic records
    Hamilton, F.
    Carroll, R.
    Hamilton, W.
    Salisbury, C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 111 (07) : 1410 - 1420
  • [9] The risk of cancer in primary care patients with hypercalcaemia: a cohort study using electronic records
    F Hamilton
    R Carroll
    W Hamilton
    C Salisbury
    British Journal of Cancer, 2014, 111 : 1410 - 1412
  • [10] Polypharmacy in primary care: A population-based retrospective cohort study of electronic health records
    Woodcock, Thomas
    Lovett, Derryn
    Ihenetu, Gloria
    Novov, Vesselin
    Beaney, Thomas
    Armani, Keivan
    Quilley, Angela
    Majeed, Azeem
    Aylin, Paul
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (09):