A Vision for Spaceflight Reliability: NASA's Objectives Based Strategy

被引:0
|
作者
Groen, Frank J. [1 ,2 ]
Evans, John W. [2 ]
Hall, Anthony J. [3 ]
机构
[1] NASA HQ, 300 E St SW, Washington, DC USA
[2] NASA HQ, 300 E St SW, Washington, DC 20546 USA
[3] Informat Syst Labs, Brooklyn, NY 11021 USA
关键词
Reliability; Maintainability; Goal Structured Notation; First Principles; Objectives Hierarchy; Safety Case;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In defining the direction for a new standard, NASA's Office of Safety and Mission Assurance (OSMA) has started from first principles. This has meant extracting critical objectives that its programs need to undertake a reliable mission and then structuring these objectives to lead mission planning. This back-to-basics approach to examining cross cutting concerns has yielded an objectives hierarchy, which has emerged from NASA reliability expertise, to define critical approaches for achieving high reliability and maintainability (R&M). It embodies the knowledge attained over years of NASA experience; yet, the hierarchy extracts essentials without prescriptive processes that may encumber creativity and effective decision-making. It is meant to lead, not follow, and to enable not encumber. Creating a hierarchy as a basis for assurance implementation is a proven approach that has emerged from the safety case ideals. This approach holds the opportunity to enable new directions in an evolving design framework, in which models will govern optimization to achieve the best designs and prescribed documents will take a back seat. The hierarchy itself may look simple, but it is the drivetrain for achieving the reliability necessary for successful missions. The expectation is that it will be put to use, as the design environment evolves, to enable the right products in a new design environment and to cost effectively achieve key objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Critical report leaves NASA's station strategy up in the air
    William Triplett
    Nature, 2001, 414 : 136 - 136
  • [42] NASA'S ORBITAL DEBRIS CONJUNCTION ASSESSMENT AND COLLISION AVOIDANCE STRATEGY
    Gavin, Richard T.
    GUIDANCE AND CONTROL 2010, 2010, 137 : 37 - 46
  • [43] NASA - US lawmaker's call for new Earth science strategy
    Lawler, A
    SCIENCE, 2005, 308 (5723) : 777 - 777
  • [44] Indexes Transformation and Evaluation of the Firm Strategy Objectives Based on BSC
    Tang, Jianxiong
    Wang, Chang
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 7349 - 7352
  • [45] Profiling Vision-based Deep Learning Architectures on NASA SpaceCube Platforms
    Chase, Timothy, Jr.
    Goodwill, Justin
    Dantu, Karthik
    Wilson, Christopher
    2024 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2024,
  • [46] Mobile robot's road following based on color vision and FGA control strategy
    Ding, Chengjun
    Cui, Genqun
    Zhang, Minglu
    Duan, Ping
    WCICA 2006: SIXTH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-12, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 3124 - +
  • [47] Human Spaceflight Technology Needs-a Foundation for JS']JSC's Technology Strategy
    Stecklein, Jonette M.
    2013 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2013,
  • [48] Space science - Scientists fear collateral damage from NASA's revised vision
    Lawler, A
    SCIENCE, 2004, 303 (5666) : 1952 - 1953
  • [49] International Vision and Strategy for Drug Regulatory Authority: The PMDA's International Vision
    Tominaga, Toshiyoshi
    Ando, Yuki
    Kondo, Tatsuya
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 92 (03) : 349 - 351
  • [50] NASA's Earth Science Gateway: A Platform for Interoperable Services in Support of the GEOSS Vision
    Alameh, Nadine S.
    Bambacus, Myra J.
    Evans, John D.
    Marley, Stephen R.
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-8, 2006, : 2477 - 2480