A Vision for Spaceflight Reliability: NASA's Objectives Based Strategy

被引:0
|
作者
Groen, Frank J. [1 ,2 ]
Evans, John W. [2 ]
Hall, Anthony J. [3 ]
机构
[1] NASA HQ, 300 E St SW, Washington, DC USA
[2] NASA HQ, 300 E St SW, Washington, DC 20546 USA
[3] Informat Syst Labs, Brooklyn, NY 11021 USA
关键词
Reliability; Maintainability; Goal Structured Notation; First Principles; Objectives Hierarchy; Safety Case;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In defining the direction for a new standard, NASA's Office of Safety and Mission Assurance (OSMA) has started from first principles. This has meant extracting critical objectives that its programs need to undertake a reliable mission and then structuring these objectives to lead mission planning. This back-to-basics approach to examining cross cutting concerns has yielded an objectives hierarchy, which has emerged from NASA reliability expertise, to define critical approaches for achieving high reliability and maintainability (R&M). It embodies the knowledge attained over years of NASA experience; yet, the hierarchy extracts essentials without prescriptive processes that may encumber creativity and effective decision-making. It is meant to lead, not follow, and to enable not encumber. Creating a hierarchy as a basis for assurance implementation is a proven approach that has emerged from the safety case ideals. This approach holds the opportunity to enable new directions in an evolving design framework, in which models will govern optimization to achieve the best designs and prescribed documents will take a back seat. The hierarchy itself may look simple, but it is the drivetrain for achieving the reliability necessary for successful missions. The expectation is that it will be put to use, as the design environment evolves, to enable the right products in a new design environment and to cost effectively achieve key objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Basic Objectives of the U.S.Strategy in Central Asia
    Yang Hongxi Wang Wenzhang Wu Hang
    International Understanding, 2011, (02) : 22 - 24
  • [32] Reliability Analysis of Complex NASA Systems with Model-Based Engineering
    Lindsey, Nancy J.
    Alimardani, Mahdi
    Gallo, Luis D.
    2020 ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS 2020), 2020,
  • [33] The wrong stuff (NASA and President Bush's "new vision for space exploration")
    Weinberg, S
    NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS, 2004, 51 (06) : 12 - +
  • [34] A strategy for reliability-based optimization
    Pu, Y
    Das, PK
    Faulkner, D
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1997, 19 (03) : 276 - 282
  • [35] China's maritime strategy in the new vision
    Zhang, Shiyang
    Mao, Zhengkai
    Zhang, Zhijun
    MARINE POLICY, 2023, 155
  • [36] Critical report leaves NASA's station strategy up in the air
    Triplett, W
    NATURE, 2001, 414 (6860) : 136 - 136
  • [37] VLDB Vision: Oracle's VLDB strategy
    Held, J.
    Database Programming & Design, 10 (08):
  • [38] China's International Vision and National Strategy
    Gong Li
    Hong Jianjun
    Contemporary International Relations, 2014, (04) : 72 - 75
  • [39] NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate New Vision & Strategy for Aeronautics Research: How will it Support Resilience?
    Pearce, Robert A.
    2014 IEEE/AIAA 33RD DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2014,
  • [40] NASA's Asteroid Grand Challenge: Strategy, Results, and Lessons Learned
    Gustetic, Jennifer L.
    Friedensen, Victoria
    Kessler, Jason L.
    Jackson, Shanessa
    Parr, James
    SPACE POLICY, 2018, 44-45 : 1 - 13