River flow modelling: comparison of performance and evaluation of uncertainty using data-driven models and conceptual hydrological model

被引:36
|
作者
Zhang, Zhenghao [1 ]
Zhang, Qiang [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Singh, Vijay P. [5 ,6 ]
Shi, Peijun [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Water Resources & Environm, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, Key Lab Environm Changes & Nat Hazards, Minist Educ, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 10087, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing 10087, Peoples R China
[5] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[6] Texas A&M Univ, Zachry Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Wavelet decomposition; Artificial neural network; GR4J model; Bootstrap method; Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method; Uncertainty; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; CHANGING PROPERTIES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; GLUE METHOD; EAST RIVER; SHORT-TERM; STREAMFLOW; BASIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-018-1536-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydrological and statistical models are playing an increasing role in hydrological forecasting, particularly for river basins with data of different temporal scales. In this study, statistical models, e.g. artificial neural networks, adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system, genetic programming, least squares support vector machine, multiple linear regression, were developed, based on parametric optimization methods such as particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA), and data-preprocessing techniques such as wavelet decomposition (WD) for river flow modelling using daily streamflow data from four hydrological stations for a period of 1954-2009. These models were used for 1-, 3- and 5-day streamflow forecasting and the better model was used for uncertainty evaluation using bootstrap resampling method. Meanwhile, a simple conceptual hydrological model GR4J was used to evaluate parametric uncertainty based on generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method. Results indicated that: (1) GA and PSO did not help improve the forecast performance of the model. However, the hybrid model with WD significantly improved the forecast performance; (2) the hybrid model with WD as a data preprocessing procedure can clarify hydrological effects of water reservoirs and can capture peak high/ low flow changes; (3) Forecast accuracy of data-driven models is significantly influenced by the availability of streamflow data. More human interferences from the upper to the lower East River basin can help to introduce greater uncertainty in streamflow forecasts; (4) The structure of GR4J may introduce larger parametric uncertainty at the Longchuan station than at the Boluo station in the East river basin. This study provides a theoretical background for data-driven model-based streamflow forecasting and a comprehensive view about data and parametric uncertainty in data-scarce river basins.
引用
收藏
页码:2667 / 2682
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tracing conceptual models' evolution in data warehouses by using the model driven architecture
    Mate, Alejandro
    Trujillo, Juan
    COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES, 2014, 36 (05) : 831 - 843
  • [42] A Flexible Data-Driven Prognostics Model Using System Performance Metrics
    -Gonzalez, Abel Diaz
    Coursey, Austin
    Quinones-Grueiro, Marcos
    Biswas, Gautam
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2024, 58 (04): : 222 - 227
  • [43] Data-driven Prognostics with Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Ensemble of Deep Ordinal Regression Models
    Vishnu, T. V.
    Diksha
    Malhotra, Pankaj
    Vig, Lovekesh
    Shroff, Gautam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROGNOSTICS AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2019, 10
  • [44] Performance Assessment of the Linear, Nonlinear and Nonparametric Data Driven Models in River Flow Forecasting
    Ahani, Ali
    Shourian, Mojtaba
    Rad, Peiman Rahimi
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 32 (02) : 383 - 399
  • [45] Performance Assessment of the Linear, Nonlinear and Nonparametric Data Driven Models in River Flow Forecasting
    Ali Ahani
    Mojtaba Shourian
    Peiman Rahimi Rad
    Water Resources Management, 2018, 32 : 383 - 399
  • [46] Data-driven uncertainty quantification for predictive flow and transport modeling using support vector machines
    He, Jiachuan
    Mattis, Steven A.
    Butler, Troy D.
    Dawson, Clint N.
    COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 23 (04) : 631 - 645
  • [47] Data-driven uncertainty quantification for predictive flow and transport modeling using support vector machines
    Jiachuan He
    Steven A. Mattis
    Troy D. Butler
    Clint N. Dawson
    Computational Geosciences, 2019, 23 : 631 - 645
  • [48] P-CS UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION MODEL AND ITS PERFORMANCE DATA-DRIVEN UPDATING METHOD
    He J.
    Jia X.
    Wu W.
    Zhong J.
    Luo Y.
    Lixue Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2022, 54 (10): : 2808 - 2824
  • [49] Data-driven predictive model of reliability estimation using degradation models: a review
    Farhad Balali
    Hamid Seifoddini
    Adel Nasiri
    Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering, 2020, 9 (1) : 113 - 125
  • [50] Kinetic modelling of [11C]flumazenil using model-driven and data-driven methods
    Stangier, Isabelle
    Liedtke, C.
    Ziegler, S. I.
    Spilker, M. E.
    Boecker, H.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 31 : T97 - T97