River flow modelling: comparison of performance and evaluation of uncertainty using data-driven models and conceptual hydrological model

被引:36
|
作者
Zhang, Zhenghao [1 ]
Zhang, Qiang [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Singh, Vijay P. [5 ,6 ]
Shi, Peijun [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Water Resources & Environm, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, Key Lab Environm Changes & Nat Hazards, Minist Educ, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 10087, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing 10087, Peoples R China
[5] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[6] Texas A&M Univ, Zachry Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Wavelet decomposition; Artificial neural network; GR4J model; Bootstrap method; Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method; Uncertainty; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; CHANGING PROPERTIES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; GLUE METHOD; EAST RIVER; SHORT-TERM; STREAMFLOW; BASIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-018-1536-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydrological and statistical models are playing an increasing role in hydrological forecasting, particularly for river basins with data of different temporal scales. In this study, statistical models, e.g. artificial neural networks, adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system, genetic programming, least squares support vector machine, multiple linear regression, were developed, based on parametric optimization methods such as particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA), and data-preprocessing techniques such as wavelet decomposition (WD) for river flow modelling using daily streamflow data from four hydrological stations for a period of 1954-2009. These models were used for 1-, 3- and 5-day streamflow forecasting and the better model was used for uncertainty evaluation using bootstrap resampling method. Meanwhile, a simple conceptual hydrological model GR4J was used to evaluate parametric uncertainty based on generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method. Results indicated that: (1) GA and PSO did not help improve the forecast performance of the model. However, the hybrid model with WD significantly improved the forecast performance; (2) the hybrid model with WD as a data preprocessing procedure can clarify hydrological effects of water reservoirs and can capture peak high/ low flow changes; (3) Forecast accuracy of data-driven models is significantly influenced by the availability of streamflow data. More human interferences from the upper to the lower East River basin can help to introduce greater uncertainty in streamflow forecasts; (4) The structure of GR4J may introduce larger parametric uncertainty at the Longchuan station than at the Boluo station in the East river basin. This study provides a theoretical background for data-driven model-based streamflow forecasting and a comprehensive view about data and parametric uncertainty in data-scarce river basins.
引用
收藏
页码:2667 / 2682
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative analysis of data-driven and conceptual streamflow forecasting models with uncertainty assessment in a major basin in Iran
    Ashrafzadeh A.
    Salehpoor J.
    Lotfirad M.
    International Journal of Energy and Water Resources, 2024, 8 (4) : 507 - 520
  • [22] Ideal point error for model assessment in data-driven river flow forecasting
    Dawson, C. W.
    Mount, N. J.
    Abrahart, R. J.
    Shamseldin, A. Y.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (08) : 3049 - 3060
  • [23] Evaluation of physics constrained data-driven methods for turbulence model uncertainty quantification
    Matha, Marcel
    Kucharczyk, Karsten
    Morsbach, Christian
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2023, 255
  • [24] Uncertainty estimation of hydrological modelling using gridded precipitation as model inputs in the Gandaki River Basin
    Zeng, Qiang
    Zhao, Qiang
    Luo, Yang-Tao
    Ma, Shun-Gang
    Kang, You
    Li, Yu-Qiong
    Chen, Hua
    Xu, Chong-Yu
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2024, 53
  • [25] Comparison of Data-Driven Thermal Building Models for Model Predictive Control
    Steindl, Gernot
    Kastner, Wolfgang
    Stangl, Verena
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY WATER AND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS-JSDEWES, 2019, 7 (04): : 730 - 742
  • [26] COMPARISON OF A PHYSICALLY-BASED AND DATA-DRIVEN MODEL IN THE BELA RIVER BASIN
    Roncak, Peter
    Bezak, Juraj
    Bajtek, Zbynek
    Cisty, Milan
    12TH INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC GEOCONFERENCE, SGEM 2012, VOL. III, 2012, : 595 - 602
  • [27] River Stage Forecasting Using Wavelet Packet Decomposition and Data-driven Models
    Seo, Youngmin
    Kim, Sungwon
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HYDROINFORMATICS (HIC 2016) - SMART WATER FOR THE FUTURE, 2016, 154 : 1225 - 1230
  • [28] Data-driven subsurface modelling using a Markov random field model
    Shuku, Takayuki
    Phoon, Kok-Kwang
    GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2023, 17 (01) : 41 - 63
  • [29] A comparison of data-driven reduced order models for the simulation of mesoscale atmospheric flow
    Hajisharifi, Arash
    Girfoglio, Michele
    Quaini, Annalisa
    Rozza, Gianluigi
    FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2024, 228
  • [30] Experimental Evaluation of Solar Radiation and Solar Efficacy Models and Performance of Data-Driven Models
    Cong Thanh Do
    Shen, Hui
    Chan, Ying-Chieh
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 27 (01)