Prediction Models for Prognosis of Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

被引:9
|
作者
He, Bingjie [1 ]
Chen, Weiye [1 ]
Liu, Lili [1 ]
Hou, Zheng [2 ]
Zhu, Haiyan [3 ]
Cheng, Haozhe [3 ]
Zhang, Yixi [3 ]
Zhan, Siyan [1 ]
Wang, Shengfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Obster & Gynecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
cervical cancer; prediction model; predictors; risk of bias; statistical analysis; RISK; NOMOGRAM; CARCINOMA; TOOL; APPLICABILITY; VALIDATION; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL; PROBAST; BIAS;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2021.654454
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: This work aims to systematically identify, describe, and appraise all prognostic models for cervical cancer and provide a reference for clinical practice and future research. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases up to December 2020 and included studies developing, validating, or updating a prognostic model for cervical cancer. Two reviewers extracted information based on the CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modeling Studies checklist and assessed the risk of bias using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool. Results: Fifty-six eligible articles were identified, describing the development of 77 prognostic models and 27 external validation efforts. The 77 prognostic models focused on three types of cervical cancer patients at different stages, i.e., patients with early-stage cervical cancer (n = 29; 38%), patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (n = 27; 35%), and all-stage cervical cancer patients (n = 21; 27%). Among the 77 models, the most frequently used predictors were lymph node status (n = 57; 74%), the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (n = 42; 55%), histological types (n = 38; 49%), and tumor size (n = 37; 48%). The number of models that applied internal validation, presented a full equation, and assessed model calibration was 52 (68%), 16 (21%), and 45 (58%), respectively. Twenty-four models were externally validated, among which three were validated twice. None of the models were assessed with an overall low risk of bias. The Prediction Model of Failure in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer model was externally validated twice, with acceptable performance, and seemed to be the most reliable. Conclusions: Methodological details including internal validation, sample size, and handling of missing data need to be emphasized on, and external validation is needed to facilitate the application and generalization of models for cervical cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Critical Appraisal of Decision Models Used for the Economic Evaluation of Bladder Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Systematic Review
    Mandrik, Olena
    Hahn, Anne I.
    Catto, James W. F.
    Zauber, Ann G.
    Cumberbatch, Marcus
    Chilcott, James
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2023, 41 (06) : 633 - 650
  • [42] Critical Appraisal of Decision Models Used for the Economic Evaluation of Bladder Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Systematic Review
    Olena Mandrik
    Anne I. Hahn
    James W. F. Catto
    Ann G. Zauber
    Marcus Cumberbatch
    James Chilcott
    PharmacoEconomics, 2023, 41 : 633 - 650
  • [43] Critical Appraisal of a Systematic Review: A Concise Review
    Patel, Jayshil J.
    Hill, Aileen
    Lee, Zheng-Yii
    Heyland, Daren K.
    Stoppe, Christian
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (09) : 1371 - 1379
  • [44] COVID Mortality Prediction with Machine Learning Methods: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal
    Bottino, Francesca
    Tagliente, Emanuela
    Pasquini, Luca
    Di Napoli, Alberto
    Lucignani, Martina
    Figa-Talamanca, Lorenzo
    Napolitano, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [45] Prediction model for cognitive frailty in older adults: A systematic review and critical appraisal
    Huang, Jundan
    Zeng, Xianmei
    Hu, Mingyue
    Ning, Hongting
    Wu, Shuang
    Peng, Ruotong
    Feng, Hui
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 15
  • [46] A critical appraisal on cancer prognosis and artificial intelligence
    Sarode, Sachin C.
    Sharma, Nilesh Kumar
    Sarode, Gargi
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 (13) : 1531 - 1534
  • [47] Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal
    Leushuis, Esther
    van der Steeg, Jan Willem
    Steures, Pieternel
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    Eijkemans, Marinus J. C.
    van der Veen, Fulco
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    Hompes, Peter G. A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2009, 15 (05) : 537 - 552
  • [48] CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF MACHINE LEARNING PROGNOSTIC MODELS FOR ACUTE PANCREATITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Lahooti, Ila
    Critelli, Brian
    Hassan, Amier
    Lahooti, Ali
    Matzko, Nathan
    Adams, Jan Niklas
    Liss, Lukas
    Quion, Justin
    Restrepo, David
    Nikahd, Melica
    Culp, Stacey
    Noh, Lydia
    Park, Jun Sung
    Tong, Kathleen
    Akshintala, Venkata S.
    Windsor, John A.
    Mull, Nikhil K.
    Papachristou, Georgios
    Krishna, Somashekar G.
    Han, Samuel
    Ramsey, Mitchell L.
    Hart, Phil A.
    Celi, Leo Anthony
    Lee, Peter
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S286 - S286
  • [49] Predictive models for the incidence of Parkinson's disease: systematic review and critical appraisal
    Chen, Yancong
    Gao, Yinyan
    Sun, Xuemei
    Liu, Zhenhua
    Zhang, Zixuan
    Qin, Lang
    Song, Jinlu
    Wang, Huan
    Wu, Irene X. Y.
    REVIEWS IN THE NEUROSCIENCES, 2023, 34 (01) : 63 - 74
  • [50] The Use of Decision–Analytic Models in Atopic Eczema: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal
    Emma McManus
    Tracey Sach
    Nick Levell
    PharmacoEconomics, 2018, 36 : 51 - 66