Prediction Models for Prognosis of Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

被引:9
|
作者
He, Bingjie [1 ]
Chen, Weiye [1 ]
Liu, Lili [1 ]
Hou, Zheng [2 ]
Zhu, Haiyan [3 ]
Cheng, Haozhe [3 ]
Zhang, Yixi [3 ]
Zhan, Siyan [1 ]
Wang, Shengfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Obster & Gynecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
cervical cancer; prediction model; predictors; risk of bias; statistical analysis; RISK; NOMOGRAM; CARCINOMA; TOOL; APPLICABILITY; VALIDATION; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL; PROBAST; BIAS;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2021.654454
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: This work aims to systematically identify, describe, and appraise all prognostic models for cervical cancer and provide a reference for clinical practice and future research. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases up to December 2020 and included studies developing, validating, or updating a prognostic model for cervical cancer. Two reviewers extracted information based on the CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modeling Studies checklist and assessed the risk of bias using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool. Results: Fifty-six eligible articles were identified, describing the development of 77 prognostic models and 27 external validation efforts. The 77 prognostic models focused on three types of cervical cancer patients at different stages, i.e., patients with early-stage cervical cancer (n = 29; 38%), patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (n = 27; 35%), and all-stage cervical cancer patients (n = 21; 27%). Among the 77 models, the most frequently used predictors were lymph node status (n = 57; 74%), the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (n = 42; 55%), histological types (n = 38; 49%), and tumor size (n = 37; 48%). The number of models that applied internal validation, presented a full equation, and assessed model calibration was 52 (68%), 16 (21%), and 45 (58%), respectively. Twenty-four models were externally validated, among which three were validated twice. None of the models were assessed with an overall low risk of bias. The Prediction Model of Failure in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer model was externally validated twice, with acceptable performance, and seemed to be the most reliable. Conclusions: Methodological details including internal validation, sample size, and handling of missing data need to be emphasized on, and external validation is needed to facilitate the application and generalization of models for cervical cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of the colonization or infection of multidrug-resistant organisms in adults: a systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis
    Liu, Xu
    Liu, Xi
    Jin, Chenyue
    Luo, Yuting
    Yang, Lianping
    Ning, Xinjiao
    Zhuo, Chao
    Xiao, Fei
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2024, 30 (11) : 1364 - 1373
  • [32] Letter: Prediction Models for Postoperative Pneumonia in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal
    Pang, Zilei
    Zhao, Lili
    Lu, Shuping
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2025,
  • [33] Prediction models for the complication incidence and survival rate of dental implants-a systematic review and critical appraisal
    Zhu, Yuanxi
    Du, Mi
    Li, Ping
    Lu, Hongye
    Li, An
    Xu, Shulan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2025, 11 (01)
  • [34] Prediction models for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a protocol for systematic review and critical appraisal
    Wang, Danqiong
    Zhang, Weiwen
    Luo, Jian
    Fang, Honglong
    Jing, Shanshan
    Mei, Zubing
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (05):
  • [35] Prognostic models for outcome prediction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and critical appraisal
    Bellou, Vanesa
    Belbasis, Lazaros
    Konstantinidis, Athanasios K.
    Tzoulaki, Ioanna
    Evangelou, Evangelos
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 367
  • [36] Risk Prediction Models for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Pregnant and Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal
    Hou, Yuqing
    Feng, Suwen
    Tong, Baoqin
    Lu, Shuping
    Wang, Hongyan
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2025,
  • [37] THE NARRATIVE EXPERIENCE OF CHILDHOOD CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND CRITICAL APPRAISAL
    Croal, L.
    Jibb, L. A.
    Cheung, V.
    Stinson, J. N.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2014, 61 : S214 - S214
  • [38] Can risk prediction models help us individualise stillbirth prevention? A systematic review and critical appraisal of published risk models
    Townsend, R.
    Manji, A.
    Allotey, J.
    Heazell, A. E. P.
    Jorgensen, L.
    Magee, L. A.
    Mol, B. W.
    Snell, K. I. E.
    Riley, R. D.
    Sandall, J.
    Smith, G. C. S.
    Patel, M.
    Thilaganathan, B.
    von Dadelszen, P.
    Thangaratinam, S.
    Khalil, A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 (02) : 214 - 224
  • [39] Risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in elderly patients with fragility hip fracture: A systematic review and critical appraisal
    Zhou, Bingqian
    Wang, Ai
    Cao, Hong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA NURSING, 2024, 52
  • [40] Is there a place for sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening? A systematic review and critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness models
    Diedrich, Leonie
    Brinkmann, Melanie
    Dreier, Maren
    Rossol, Siegbert
    Schramm, Wendelin
    Krauth, Christian
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):