Active surveillance for patients with localized prostate cancer. Adherence and protocol drop analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Marcos Asensio, Sara [1 ]
Virseda Rodriguez, Alvaro Julio [1 ,2 ]
Martin Izquierdo, Maria Manuela [1 ,3 ]
Herrero Polo, Manuel [1 ,2 ]
Coderque Mejia, Monica Paola [1 ,2 ]
Rocha de Lossada, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Hinchado Morgado, Sara [1 ]
Noya Mourullo, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Garcia Gomez, Francisco [1 ,2 ]
Hernandez Sanchez, Teresa [1 ,2 ]
Antunez Plaza, Patricia [1 ,4 ]
Garcia Garcia, Javier [1 ,2 ]
Martin-Vallejo, Javier [5 ]
Gomez Veiga, Francisco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Invest Biomed Salamanca, Grp Invest Traslac Urol GITUR IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain
[2] Complejo Asistencial Univ Salamanca, Serv Urol, Salamanca, Spain
[3] Complejo Asistencial Univ Salamanca, Serv Radiodiagnost, Salamanca, Spain
[4] Complejo Asistencial Univ Salamanca, Serv Anat Patol, Salamanca, Spain
[5] Univ Salamanca, Fac Med, Dept Estadist, Salamanca, Spain
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2021年 / 74卷 / 05期
关键词
Prostate Cancer; Active Surveillance; Adherence; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: VA is currently considered the treatment of choice for patients with low and very low risk prostate cancer. We analyzed the evolution of this treatment strategy in our series and adherence to the protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ambispective study of patients in VA in our center between 2014- 2019. 237 meet inclusion criteria, of which 142 (60%) have a minimum of 12 months of follow- up. Mean age: 68.5 (4678), median PSA 6.37 ng / ml (1-33). 229 (96.6%) are ISUP 1 and 8 (3.4%) ISUP 2. Objectives are proposed to assess our adherence to the protocol. Descriptive statistics are used to communicate the results. RESULTS: According to the classification by risk groups of the NCCN, 145 (61.2%), 49 (20.7%) and 42 (17.7%) were very low risk, low risk and favorable intermediate risk patients, respectively. The median of follow-up is 14 months (0-66). Of the patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, 107 (75.4%) were re-biopsied. 80 (33.8%) leave the protocol in these 5 years, 31.3% (25) by their own decision, 55% (44) due to medical criteria, and 11.3% (9) go to WW. After 5 years of follow-up, 99.2% of patients are still alive, 0.8% died of specific non-cancer causes. Of the objectives to assess adherence, 8 are achieved, 1 partially and 1 is not evaluable. CONCLUSIONS: VA in our center is already the treatment of choice for very low-risk patients, with a constant increase from year to year. Adherence to the protocol has been favorable during the period of time studied.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 487
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The role of MRI in active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer
    Recabal, Pedro
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2015, 25 (06) : 504 - 509
  • [42] Active Surveillance of Localized Prostate Cancer: Acknowledging Uncertainty Reply
    Chen, Ronald C.
    Rumble, R. Bryan
    Jain, Suneil
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (36) : 4453 - U260
  • [43] Active surveillance with selective radical treatment for localized prostate cancer
    van As, Nicholas J.
    Parker, Chris C.
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2007, 13 (05): : 289 - 294
  • [44] A randomized study of enzalutamide in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance (ENACT).
    Shore, Neal D.
    Vourganti, Srinivas
    Silberstein, Jonathan L.
    Brown, Bruce A.
    Wilson, Samuel
    Hollowell, Courtney M. P.
    Cooperberg, Matthew
    Shang, Gwendoline
    Fleshner, Neil Eric
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [45] Characteristics and Experiences of Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer Who Left an Active Surveillance Program
    Zackary D. Berger
    Jonathan C. Yeh
    H. Ballentine Carter
    Craig Evan Pollack
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2014, 7 : 427 - 436
  • [46] Characteristics and Experiences of Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer Who Left an Active Surveillance Program
    Berger, Zackary D.
    Yeh, Jonathan C.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Pollack, Craig Evan
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (04): : 427 - 436
  • [47] Follow-up in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Strict Protocol Adherence Remains Important for PRIAS-ineligible Patients
    Soeterik, Timo F. W.
    van Melick, Harm H. E.
    Dijksman, Lea M.
    Biesma, Douwe H.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Van Basten, Jean-Paul A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (05): : 483 - 489
  • [48] Value of multimodality MRI and MR-guided biopsy at inclusion in an active surveillance protocol for prostate cancer.
    Somford, Diederik Meindert
    Hoeks, Caroline M.
    van den Bergh, Roderick C.
    Vergunst, Henk
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Smits, Geert A.
    Oddens, Jorg R.
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (05)
  • [49] Active surveillance for localized prostate cancer: An analysis of patient contacts and utilization of healthcare resources
    Thomsen, Frederik B.
    Berg, Kasper D.
    Roder, M. Andreas
    Iversen, Peter
    Brasso, Klaus
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 49 (01) : 43 - 50
  • [50] The effect of dual eligibility on the quality of active surveillance in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
    Faraj, Kassem S.
    Dunn, Rodney
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Shahinian, Vahakn B.
    Herrel, Lindsey A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (4_SUPPL) : 266 - 266