Active surveillance for patients with localized prostate cancer. Adherence and protocol drop analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Marcos Asensio, Sara [1 ]
Virseda Rodriguez, Alvaro Julio [1 ,2 ]
Martin Izquierdo, Maria Manuela [1 ,3 ]
Herrero Polo, Manuel [1 ,2 ]
Coderque Mejia, Monica Paola [1 ,2 ]
Rocha de Lossada, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Hinchado Morgado, Sara [1 ]
Noya Mourullo, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Garcia Gomez, Francisco [1 ,2 ]
Hernandez Sanchez, Teresa [1 ,2 ]
Antunez Plaza, Patricia [1 ,4 ]
Garcia Garcia, Javier [1 ,2 ]
Martin-Vallejo, Javier [5 ]
Gomez Veiga, Francisco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Invest Biomed Salamanca, Grp Invest Traslac Urol GITUR IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain
[2] Complejo Asistencial Univ Salamanca, Serv Urol, Salamanca, Spain
[3] Complejo Asistencial Univ Salamanca, Serv Radiodiagnost, Salamanca, Spain
[4] Complejo Asistencial Univ Salamanca, Serv Anat Patol, Salamanca, Spain
[5] Univ Salamanca, Fac Med, Dept Estadist, Salamanca, Spain
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2021年 / 74卷 / 05期
关键词
Prostate Cancer; Active Surveillance; Adherence; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: VA is currently considered the treatment of choice for patients with low and very low risk prostate cancer. We analyzed the evolution of this treatment strategy in our series and adherence to the protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ambispective study of patients in VA in our center between 2014- 2019. 237 meet inclusion criteria, of which 142 (60%) have a minimum of 12 months of follow- up. Mean age: 68.5 (4678), median PSA 6.37 ng / ml (1-33). 229 (96.6%) are ISUP 1 and 8 (3.4%) ISUP 2. Objectives are proposed to assess our adherence to the protocol. Descriptive statistics are used to communicate the results. RESULTS: According to the classification by risk groups of the NCCN, 145 (61.2%), 49 (20.7%) and 42 (17.7%) were very low risk, low risk and favorable intermediate risk patients, respectively. The median of follow-up is 14 months (0-66). Of the patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, 107 (75.4%) were re-biopsied. 80 (33.8%) leave the protocol in these 5 years, 31.3% (25) by their own decision, 55% (44) due to medical criteria, and 11.3% (9) go to WW. After 5 years of follow-up, 99.2% of patients are still alive, 0.8% died of specific non-cancer causes. Of the objectives to assess adherence, 8 are achieved, 1 partially and 1 is not evaluable. CONCLUSIONS: VA in our center is already the treatment of choice for very low-risk patients, with a constant increase from year to year. Adherence to the protocol has been favorable during the period of time studied.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 487
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and grade group progression in localized prostate cancer: An active surveillance cohort
    Gregg, Justin R.
    Zhang, Xiaotao
    Chapin, Brian F.
    Ward, John F.
    Kim, Jeri
    Davis, John W.
    Daniel, Carrie R.
    CANCER, 2021, 127 (05) : 720 - 728
  • [22] Active surveillance protocol in prostate cancer in Portugal
    Gaspar, S. R. da Silva
    Fernandes, M.
    Castro, A.
    Oliveira, T.
    Dias, J. Santos
    dos Reis, J. Palma
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2022, 46 (06): : 329 - 339
  • [23] Active surveillance in prostate cancer: the French protocol
    Mottet, Nicolas
    Irani, Jacques
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2008, 18 (04): : F12 - F16
  • [24] Validation of an active surveillance threshold for the CCP score in conservatively managed men with localized prostate cancer.
    Cuzick, Jack M.
    Stone, Steven
    Fisher, Gabrielle
    North, Bernard
    Berney, Daniel M.
    Beltran, Luis
    Greenberg, David
    Moller, Henrik
    Reid, Julia E.
    Gutin, Alexander
    Lanchbury, Jerry S.
    Brawer, Michael K.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [25] Validation of an active surveillance threshold for the CCP score in conservatively managed men with localized prostate cancer.
    Stone, Steven
    Cuzick, Jack M.
    Fisher, Gabrielle
    Yang, Zi Hua
    North, Bernard
    Berney, Daniel M.
    Beltran, Luis
    Greenberg, David
    Moller, Henrik
    Reid, Julia E.
    Gutin, Alexander
    Lanchbury, Jerry S.
    Brawer, Michael K.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (07)
  • [26] Staging saturation biopsy in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance protocol
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Lane, Brian R.
    Jones, J. Stephen
    UROLOGY, 2008, 71 (04) : 573 - 577
  • [27] Use of mpMRI in active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Scarpato, Kristen R.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (07) : 320 - 325
  • [28] Active Surveillance of Localized Prostate Cancer: Acknowledging Uncertainty
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (36)
  • [29] Early outcomes of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Hardie, C
    Parker, C
    Norman, A
    Eeles, R
    Horwich, A
    Huddart, R
    Dearnaley, D
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 (07) : 956 - 960
  • [30] Appraising risk in active surveillance of localized prostate cancer
    Hogden, Anne
    Churruca, Kate
    Rapport, Frances
    Gillatt, David
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2019, 22 (05) : 1028 - 1039