Active surveillance for patients with localized prostate cancer. Adherence and protocol drop analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Marcos Asensio, Sara [1 ]
Virseda Rodriguez, Alvaro Julio [1 ,2 ]
Martin Izquierdo, Maria Manuela [1 ,3 ]
Herrero Polo, Manuel [1 ,2 ]
Coderque Mejia, Monica Paola [1 ,2 ]
Rocha de Lossada, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Hinchado Morgado, Sara [1 ]
Noya Mourullo, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Garcia Gomez, Francisco [1 ,2 ]
Hernandez Sanchez, Teresa [1 ,2 ]
Antunez Plaza, Patricia [1 ,4 ]
Garcia Garcia, Javier [1 ,2 ]
Martin-Vallejo, Javier [5 ]
Gomez Veiga, Francisco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Invest Biomed Salamanca, Grp Invest Traslac Urol GITUR IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain
[2] Complejo Asistencial Univ Salamanca, Serv Urol, Salamanca, Spain
[3] Complejo Asistencial Univ Salamanca, Serv Radiodiagnost, Salamanca, Spain
[4] Complejo Asistencial Univ Salamanca, Serv Anat Patol, Salamanca, Spain
[5] Univ Salamanca, Fac Med, Dept Estadist, Salamanca, Spain
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2021年 / 74卷 / 05期
关键词
Prostate Cancer; Active Surveillance; Adherence; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: VA is currently considered the treatment of choice for patients with low and very low risk prostate cancer. We analyzed the evolution of this treatment strategy in our series and adherence to the protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ambispective study of patients in VA in our center between 2014- 2019. 237 meet inclusion criteria, of which 142 (60%) have a minimum of 12 months of follow- up. Mean age: 68.5 (4678), median PSA 6.37 ng / ml (1-33). 229 (96.6%) are ISUP 1 and 8 (3.4%) ISUP 2. Objectives are proposed to assess our adherence to the protocol. Descriptive statistics are used to communicate the results. RESULTS: According to the classification by risk groups of the NCCN, 145 (61.2%), 49 (20.7%) and 42 (17.7%) were very low risk, low risk and favorable intermediate risk patients, respectively. The median of follow-up is 14 months (0-66). Of the patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, 107 (75.4%) were re-biopsied. 80 (33.8%) leave the protocol in these 5 years, 31.3% (25) by their own decision, 55% (44) due to medical criteria, and 11.3% (9) go to WW. After 5 years of follow-up, 99.2% of patients are still alive, 0.8% died of specific non-cancer causes. Of the objectives to assess adherence, 8 are achieved, 1 partially and 1 is not evaluable. CONCLUSIONS: VA in our center is already the treatment of choice for very low-risk patients, with a constant increase from year to year. Adherence to the protocol has been favorable during the period of time studied.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 487
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Descriptive analysis of patients on active surveillance escalating to treatment for localized prostate cancer.
    Son, Young
    Wu, Edward
    Akanda, Shawon
    Klimowich, Katelyn
    Mueller, Thomas
    Brown, Gordon Andrew
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [2] Nationwide analysis of genitourinary expert opinions on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.
    McClelland, Shearwood
    Sandler, Kiri A.
    Degnin, Catherine
    Chen, Yiyi
    Mitin, Timur
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (06)
  • [3] Regional differences in the utilization of active surveillance in localized prostate cancer.
    Scherzer, Nickolas David
    Srivastav, Sudesh
    DiBiase, Steven J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [4] ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER-A PROSPECTIVE PROTOCOL
    Davis, John W.
    Troncoso, Patricia
    Ward, John F.
    Pettaway, Curtis A.
    Pisters, Louis L.
    Kuban, Deborah
    Brown, Victoria
    Logothetis, Christopher
    Kim, Jeri
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 177 - 177
  • [5] Active surveillance of localized prostate cancer.: Significance of prostate core needle biopsies
    Rueschoff, J.
    Middel, P.
    Albers, P.
    PATHOLOGE, 2008, 29 (05): : 339 - 347
  • [6] PROGRESSION OF PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER IN ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Ozkan, T. A.
    Ustuner, M.
    Ozkan, L.
    Saribacak, A.
    Yilmaz, H.
    Muezzinoglu, B.
    Dillioglugil, O.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (06) : 562 - 562
  • [7] Economic analysis of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Kim, Sun I. I.
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    Evans, Christopher P.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2012, 22 (03) : 247 - 253
  • [8] Active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Tinay, Ilker
    Turkeri, Levent
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2012, 11 (02): : 114 - 118
  • [9] Active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Staerman, F.
    Peyromaure, M.
    Irani, J.
    Gaschignard, N.
    Mottet, N.
    Soulie, M.
    Salomon, L.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2011, 21 (07): : 448 - 454
  • [10] Active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Drouin, S. J.
    Roupret, M.
    Hamdy, F.
    Mottet, N.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2010, 20 : S181 - S185