New BEM/BEM and BEM/FEM scalar potential formulations for magnetostatic problems

被引:10
|
作者
Rodopoulos, Dimitrios C. [1 ]
Gortsas, Theodore V. [1 ]
Polyzos, Konstantinos [2 ]
Tsinopoulos, Stephanos V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Dept Mech Engn & Aeronaut, GR-26500 Patras, Greece
[2] Univ Patras, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Technol, GR-26500 Patras, Greece
[3] Technol Educ Inst Western Greece, Dept Mech Engn, GR-26334 Patras, Greece
关键词
BEM; BEM/FEM coupling; Magnetostatics; Scalar potential; 2D strongly/weakly singular integration; BOUNDARY INTEGRAL-EQUATION; FINITE-ELEMENT-METHOD; FIELD CALCULATION; COMPUTATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enganabound.2019.04.024
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The majority of the numerical methods applied so far for the simulation of a magnetostatic problem is based either on reduced and total scalar or vector potential formulations. The first one suffers from cancellation errors, the second one from the difficulty of defining the jump condition for potential on the surface of a magnet. Furthermore, the vector potential introduces three Degrees of Freedom per node increasing the computational effort for the solution of a three dimensional problem. Mayergoyz et al. (1987) proposed an alternative formulation, which is based on scalar potentials and is free of the aforementioned problems. The present work implements this formulation for the solution of magnetostatic problems by utilizing either Boundary Element Method (BEM) or its combination with Finite Element Method (FEM). Both numerical schemes are explained for two dimensional and linear problems. Two representative magnetostatic problems are solved and their solutions are compared to the corresponding ones taken by well-known commercial package.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 169
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DYNAMIC ELASTOPLASTIC ANALYSIS BY BEM/FEM
    PAVLATOS, GD
    BESKOS, DE
    [J]. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 1994, 14 (01) : 51 - 63
  • [32] Convergence of the iterative coupling of BEM and FEM
    Elleithy, WM
    Al-Gahtani, HJ
    El-Gebeily, M
    [J]. BOUNDARY ELEMENTS XXI, 1999, 6 : 281 - 290
  • [33] Coupling of FEM and BEM in Shape Optimization
    Karsten Eppler
    Helmut Harbrecht
    [J]. Numerische Mathematik, 2006, 104 : 47 - 68
  • [34] FEM and BEM in the context of information retrieval
    Mackerle, J
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2002, 80 (20-21) : 1595 - 1604
  • [35] AIDS TO EFFECTIVE DESIGN - FEM OR BEM
    JOHNSON, RP
    [J]. CME-CHARTERED MECHANICAL ENGINEER, 1987, 34 (09): : 27 - 31
  • [36] FEM/BEM for simulation of LSAW devices
    Taziev, R. A.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2007, 54 (10) : 2060 - 2069
  • [37] Indirect formulations for symmetric Galerkin BEM and space derivartive problems
    Yu, GY
    [J]. ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 2003, 20 (3-4) : 409 - 435
  • [38] BEM formulations applied to gradient plasticity
    Fudoli, CA
    Venturini, WS
    Benallal, A
    [J]. BOUNDARY ELEMENTS XXII, 2000, 8 : 61 - 70
  • [39] Magnetostatic analysis by BEM for multiply connected problem
    Ishibashi, Kazuhisa
    Andjelic, Zoran
    Lage, Christian
    Di Barba, Paolo
    [J]. COMPEL-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR COMPUTATION AND MATHEMATICS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2024, 43 (03) : 551 - 563
  • [40] ON THE BEM LUMPED MASS FORMULATIONS OF WAVE-EQUATION PROBLEMS
    PROVATIDIS, C
    KANARACHOS, A
    [J]. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 1993, 11 (04) : 319 - 325