New BEM/BEM and BEM/FEM scalar potential formulations for magnetostatic problems

被引:10
|
作者
Rodopoulos, Dimitrios C. [1 ]
Gortsas, Theodore V. [1 ]
Polyzos, Konstantinos [2 ]
Tsinopoulos, Stephanos V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Dept Mech Engn & Aeronaut, GR-26500 Patras, Greece
[2] Univ Patras, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Technol, GR-26500 Patras, Greece
[3] Technol Educ Inst Western Greece, Dept Mech Engn, GR-26334 Patras, Greece
关键词
BEM; BEM/FEM coupling; Magnetostatics; Scalar potential; 2D strongly/weakly singular integration; BOUNDARY INTEGRAL-EQUATION; FINITE-ELEMENT-METHOD; FIELD CALCULATION; COMPUTATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enganabound.2019.04.024
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The majority of the numerical methods applied so far for the simulation of a magnetostatic problem is based either on reduced and total scalar or vector potential formulations. The first one suffers from cancellation errors, the second one from the difficulty of defining the jump condition for potential on the surface of a magnet. Furthermore, the vector potential introduces three Degrees of Freedom per node increasing the computational effort for the solution of a three dimensional problem. Mayergoyz et al. (1987) proposed an alternative formulation, which is based on scalar potentials and is free of the aforementioned problems. The present work implements this formulation for the solution of magnetostatic problems by utilizing either Boundary Element Method (BEM) or its combination with Finite Element Method (FEM). Both numerical schemes are explained for two dimensional and linear problems. Two representative magnetostatic problems are solved and their solutions are compared to the corresponding ones taken by well-known commercial package.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 169
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Isogeometric FEM-BEM coupling for magnetostatic problems using magnetic scalar potential
    Fays, Maxime
    Chadebec, Olivier
    Ramdane, Brahim
    TWENTIETH BIENNIAL IEEE CONFERENCE ON ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD COMPUTATION (IEEE CEFC 2022), 2022,
  • [2] Isogeometric FEM-BEM Coupling for Magnetostatic Problems Modeling Using Magnetic Scalar Potential
    Fays, Maxime
    Chadebec, Olivier
    Ramdane, Brahim
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2023, 59 (05)
  • [3] Nonlinear BEM/FEM scalar potential formulation for magnetostatic analysis in superconducting accelerator magnets
    Rodopoulos, Dimitrios C.
    Gortsas, Theodore V.
    Tsinopoulos, Stephanos V.
    Polyzos, Demosthenes
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2020, 113 : 259 - 267
  • [4] Variational formulations of transmission problems via FEM, BEM and DtN mappings
    Gatica, GN
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2000, 182 (3-4) : 341 - 354
  • [5] Coupled Vector FEM and Scalar BEM Formulation for Eddy Current Problems
    Royak, Mikhail E.
    Stupakov, Ilya M.
    Kondratyeva, Natalia S.
    2016 13TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENT ENGINEERING (APEIE), VOL 2, 2016, : 330 - 335
  • [6] Interface relaxation algorithms for BEM-BEM coupling and FEM-BEM coupling
    Elleithy, WM
    Tanaka, M
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2003, 192 (26-27) : 2977 - 2992
  • [7] Crack problems by FEM/BEM coupled procedures
    Apicella, A.
    Cariello, G.
    Citarella, R.
    Esposito, R.
    Boundary elements communications, 1997, 8 (04): : 222 - 229
  • [8] FEM and BEM computing costs for acoustical problems
    Wroclaw University of Technology, Institute of Telecommunication Teleinformatics and Acoustics, Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland
    Arch. Acoust., 2006, 2 (193-212):
  • [9] Weak coupling of the symmetric Galerkin BEM with FEM for potential and elastostatic problems
    Springhetti, R
    Novati, G
    Margonari, M
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2006, 13 (01): : 67 - 80
  • [10] A symmetric BEM-FEM coupling for the three-dimensional magnetostatic problem using scalar potentials
    Salgado, P.
    Selgas, V.
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2008, 32 (08) : 633 - 644