Is urban sprawl linked to green space availability?

被引:54
|
作者
Koprowska, Karolina [1 ]
Laszkiewicz, Edyta [1 ]
Kronenberg, Jakub [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lodz, Fac Econ & Sociol, POW 3-5, PL-90255 Lodz, Poland
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Land use; Urban planning; Spatial analysis; Hotspot analysis; Environmental justice; Urban green space; Postsocialist city; Central and Eastern Europe; Lodz; Poland; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; DYNAMICS; LAND; GROWTH; CITIES; URBANIZATION; CHALLENGES; IMPACTS; REGION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105723
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Acknowledging urban sprawl as one of the major threats to the functioning of urban environments, the article focuses on its possible association with urban green spaces (UGS). UGS can act as an attracting factor influencing housing demand in cities. However, the spatial distribution of UGS may affect sprawling dynamics. Therefore, the analysis focuses on finding linkages between urban sprawl and green space availability within three concentric zones of the city of Lodz. Hotspot analysis has been used as a method to describe sprawling dynamics in relation to UGS availability. UGS availability was defined as a percentage of the area of parks and forests in a 1000 m buffer. The results showed that the highest UGS availability in the peripheral zone of the city was linked to an increase in the number of residents between 2000 and 2015. The peripheral zone was also characterized by stronger clustering of hotspots of residential density. Starting from the peripheral zone, UGS availability was 6.01%, 3.45% and 2.86% of the area of each respective zone. ANOVA analysis confirmed that the average availability of UGS for newly registered residential buildings differs statistically between the rings at the 0.05 level. While most urban residents still live within the central (yet continuously depopulating) zone, it is characterized by the smallest UGS availability (2.86% covered by UGS), which might raise concerns regarding the occurrence of possible environmental injustice in terms of uneven access to benefits provided by UGS. Hotspot analysis can provide valuable input into the discussion regarding the application of specific spatially targeted measures, for the sake of sustainable urban planning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Urban sprawl of Kota city: A case study of urban heat island linked with electric consumption
    Kamboj, Sandeep
    Vedant, Shoyab Ali
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 46 : 5304 - 5314
  • [22] Global patterns in urban green space are strongly linked to human development and population density
    Bille, Rasmus Attrup
    Jensen, Kristine Engemann
    Buitenwerf, Robert
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2023, 86
  • [23] Divergent cities? Urban space production in an urban sprawl area (Bahia Cauquenes, Ushuaia)
    Carla Rodriguez, Maria
    Ayelen Martinez, Maria
    [J]. GEOGRAFICANDO, 2022, 18 (01)
  • [24] Open space, forest conservation, and urban sprawl in Maryland suburban subdivisions
    Lichtenberg, Erik
    Hardie, Ian
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 89 (05) : 1198 - 1204
  • [26] Space Accessibility and Equity of Urban Green Space
    Huang, Bo-Xun
    Li, Wen-Ying
    Ma, Wen-Juan
    Xiao, Hua
    [J]. LAND, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [27] Evaluation of urban sprawl from space using open source technologies
    Nole, Gabriele
    Murgante, Beniamino
    Calamita, Giuseppe
    Lanorte, Antonio
    Lasaponara, Rosa
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 26 : 151 - 161
  • [28] The Green Space Availability in Ufa City Metropolis
    Rakhmatullina, Irina
    Rakhmatullin, Zagir
    Zaitsev, Gleb
    Davydychev, Alexandr
    Gilmanova, Galia
    Komissarov, Mikhail
    [J]. FORESTS, 2023, 14 (07):
  • [29] Is urban agriculture urban green space? A comparison of policy arrangements for urban green space and urban agriculture in Santiago de Chile
    Contesse, Maria
    van Vliet, Bas J. M.
    Lenhart, Jennifer
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 71 : 566 - 577
  • [30] DENSITY AND URBAN SPRAWL
    PEISER, RB
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 1989, 65 (03) : 193 - 204