Animal welfare indicators for sheep during sea transport: Monitoring health and behaviour

被引:6
|
作者
Willis, Renee S. [1 ]
Fleming, Patricia A. [1 ]
Dunston-Clarke, Emma J. [1 ]
Barnes, Anne L. [1 ]
Miller, David W. [1 ]
Collins, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Coll Sci Hlth Engn & Educ, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
关键词
Welfare monitoring; Livestock export; Live export; Transport of animals by sea; Livestock; FARM; DEFINITION; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105354
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The welfare of sheep transported by sea is a pertinent issue for Australia's agriculture industry and a subject of concern amongst the general public. Evaluating the effect of sea transport on the welfare of livestock requires an accurate system of reporting. This study piloted an animal welfare monitoring protocol during two sea voyages from Australia to the Middle East. Sheep health and behaviour were analysed to determine if the protocol could detect animal responses to voyage conditions such as feeding management and changes to the pen environment. Data were recorded for target pens of five different commercial lines of Merino sheep. Principle Components (PC) analysis on behavioural data identified three principal components which were compared with voyage day, management and environmental conditions using general linear mixed modelling (GLMM). PC factor 1 scores (23.35 % of total variance) showed that resting and recumbency increased as the voyage progressed. PC factor 2 scores (17.09 % variance) demonstrated that behavioural responses to heat fluctuated by voyage day. PC factor 3 scores (9.48 % variance) showed reduced flight distances and increasingly competitive feeding behaviour as the voyage progressed. Environment and management conditions were associated with behavioural changes, with Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) being the most influential measure affecting all three PC factors (p < 0.001). There were few diseases or symptoms of ill-health (including veterinary treatments) or mortalities recorded for sample pens; however, associations between ill-health and nutrition, environmental conditions and behaviour, were identified using GLMM. Increases in WBGT were linked to increased nasal discharge (p < 0.001), ocular discharge (p < 0.05), pink eye (p < 0.05) and Panting Score 4 (p < 0.01). With few recordings of ill-health, and a low mortality incidence, it was difficult to interpret the results of comparisons between health and behaviour. It is likely that associations between health indicators and behavioural variations will be more meaningful if a welfare monitoring protocol were applied to a larger sample size. The pen-side assessments presented in this study provided a practicable and comprehensive system for monitoring the behaviour and health of sheep during sea voyages. The application of such assessments on an industry basis could better inform all stakeholders about the welfare of sheep during sea transport.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of animal welfare by a holistic approach: Behaviour, health and measured opinion
    Simonsen, HB
    [J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1996, : 91 - 96
  • [42] Farm Animal Behaviour: Characteristics for Assessment of Health and Welfare, Second Edition
    Dwyer, Cathy
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2021, 30 (01) : 105 - 106
  • [43] Data analysis supports monitoring and surveillance of sheep health and welfare in the Netherlands
    van der Heijden, M.
    Dijkstra, E.
    Holstege, M.
    van den Brom, R.
    Vellema, P.
    [J]. SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2022, 216
  • [44] Shelter and shade for grazing sheep: implications for animal welfare and production and for landscape health
    Masters, David G.
    Blache, Dominique
    Lockwood, Amy L.
    Maloney, Shane K.
    Norman, Hayley C.
    Refshauge, Gordon
    Hancock, Serina N.
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2023, 63 (07) : 623 - 644
  • [45] Scientific Opinion on sheep and goat pox EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare
    Authie, Edith
    Berg, Charlotte
    Botner, Anette
    Browman, Howard
    De Koeijer, Aline
    Depner, Klaus
    Domingo, Mariano
    Ducrot, Christian
    Edwards, Sandra
    Fourichon, Christine
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Raj, Mohan
    Sihvonen, Liisa
    Spoolder, Hans
    Stegeman, Jan Arend
    Thulke, Hans-Hermann
    Vagsholm, Ivar
    Velarde, Antonio
    Willeberg, Preben
    Zientara, Stephan
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2014, 12 (11)
  • [46] Qualitative assessment of animal behaviour as an on-farm welfare-monitoring tool
    Wemelsfelder, F
    Lawrence, AB
    [J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 51 : 21 - 25
  • [47] Qualitative and quantitative monitoring of antibiotics on dairy cattle farms in relation to animal welfare indicators
    Borriello, Giuliano
    Cagnotti, Giulia
    Avedano, Elena
    Bergagna, Stefania
    Iannello, Piero
    Di Muro, Giorgia
    Ferrini, Sara
    D'Angelo, Antonio
    Bellino, Claudio
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 22 (01) : 760 - 768
  • [48] Behaviour Indicators of Animal Welfare in Purebred and Crossbred Yearling Beef Reared in Optimal Environmental Conditions
    Marzano, Alessandra
    Correddu, Fabio
    Lunesu, Mondina Francesca
    Zgheib, Elias
    Nudda, Anna
    Pulina, Giuseppe
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (05):
  • [49] The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Monitoring Animal Identification, Health, and Behaviour
    Congdon, Jenna, V
    Hosseini, Mina
    Gading, Ezekiel F.
    Masousi, Mahdi
    Franke, Maria
    MacDonald, Suzanne E.
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (13):
  • [50] Are veterinary inspections the best way to improve animal welfare during transport?
    Herskin, Mette S.
    Overstreet, Katy
    Anneberg, Inger
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2020, 187 (06) : 242 - 242