Animal welfare indicators for sheep during sea transport: Monitoring health and behaviour

被引:6
|
作者
Willis, Renee S. [1 ]
Fleming, Patricia A. [1 ]
Dunston-Clarke, Emma J. [1 ]
Barnes, Anne L. [1 ]
Miller, David W. [1 ]
Collins, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Coll Sci Hlth Engn & Educ, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
关键词
Welfare monitoring; Livestock export; Live export; Transport of animals by sea; Livestock; FARM; DEFINITION; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105354
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The welfare of sheep transported by sea is a pertinent issue for Australia's agriculture industry and a subject of concern amongst the general public. Evaluating the effect of sea transport on the welfare of livestock requires an accurate system of reporting. This study piloted an animal welfare monitoring protocol during two sea voyages from Australia to the Middle East. Sheep health and behaviour were analysed to determine if the protocol could detect animal responses to voyage conditions such as feeding management and changes to the pen environment. Data were recorded for target pens of five different commercial lines of Merino sheep. Principle Components (PC) analysis on behavioural data identified three principal components which were compared with voyage day, management and environmental conditions using general linear mixed modelling (GLMM). PC factor 1 scores (23.35 % of total variance) showed that resting and recumbency increased as the voyage progressed. PC factor 2 scores (17.09 % variance) demonstrated that behavioural responses to heat fluctuated by voyage day. PC factor 3 scores (9.48 % variance) showed reduced flight distances and increasingly competitive feeding behaviour as the voyage progressed. Environment and management conditions were associated with behavioural changes, with Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) being the most influential measure affecting all three PC factors (p < 0.001). There were few diseases or symptoms of ill-health (including veterinary treatments) or mortalities recorded for sample pens; however, associations between ill-health and nutrition, environmental conditions and behaviour, were identified using GLMM. Increases in WBGT were linked to increased nasal discharge (p < 0.001), ocular discharge (p < 0.05), pink eye (p < 0.05) and Panting Score 4 (p < 0.01). With few recordings of ill-health, and a low mortality incidence, it was difficult to interpret the results of comparisons between health and behaviour. It is likely that associations between health indicators and behavioural variations will be more meaningful if a welfare monitoring protocol were applied to a larger sample size. The pen-side assessments presented in this study provided a practicable and comprehensive system for monitoring the behaviour and health of sheep during sea voyages. The application of such assessments on an industry basis could better inform all stakeholders about the welfare of sheep during sea transport.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Signal processing and behaviour recognition in animal welfare monitoring system
    Busch, Patrick
    Stuepmann, Frank
    Ewald, Hartmut
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE SCIENCE OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING IN ISRAEL (ICSEE), 2018,
  • [22] Stakeholders' assessment of welfare indicators for sheep and cattle exported by sea from Australia
    Pines, M. K.
    Petherick, J. C.
    Gaughan, J. B.
    Phillips, C. J. C.
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2007, 16 (04) : 489 - 498
  • [23] Application of Artificial Intelligence in Monitoring of Animal Health and Welfare
    AlZubi, Ahmad Ali
    Al-Zu'bi, Maha
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2023, 57 (11) : 1550 - 1555
  • [24] Consistency over time of animal-based welfare indicators as a further step for developing a welfare assessment monitoring scheme: The case of the Animal Welfare Indicators protocol for dairy goats
    Can, E.
    Vieira, A.
    Battini, M.
    Mattiello, S.
    Stilwell, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2017, 100 (11) : 9194 - 9204
  • [25] Relevance of animal-based indicators for the evaluation of sheep welfare as perceived by different stakeholders
    Marcone, Giovanni
    Carnovale, Francesca
    Arney, David
    De Rosa, Giuseppe
    Napolitano, Fabio
    [J]. SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2022, 217
  • [26] A novel method to measure the impact of sea transport motion on sheep welfare
    Santurtun, Eduardo
    Moreau, Valerie
    Phillips, Clive J. C.
    [J]. BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2014, 118 : 128 - 137
  • [27] A smart system for surveillance of animal welfare during transport
    Gebresenbet, G
    Wikner, I
    Van der Water, G
    Freson, L
    Geers, R
    [J]. DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2003, 110 (12): : 494 - 498
  • [28] Animal Welfare Calves are particularly at Risk during Transport
    不详
    [J]. FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 2021, 101 (04): : 29 - 29
  • [29] The impact of vehicle motion during transport on animal welfare
    Santurtun, Eduardo
    Phillips, Clive J. C.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2015, 100 : 303 - 308
  • [30] Factors Affecting Animal Welfare During Transport in Cattle
    Kara, Nurcan Karslioglu
    Koyuncu, Mehmet
    [J]. KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2011, 17 (03) : 511 - 516