Animal welfare indicators for sheep during sea transport: Monitoring health and behaviour

被引:6
|
作者
Willis, Renee S. [1 ]
Fleming, Patricia A. [1 ]
Dunston-Clarke, Emma J. [1 ]
Barnes, Anne L. [1 ]
Miller, David W. [1 ]
Collins, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Coll Sci Hlth Engn & Educ, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
关键词
Welfare monitoring; Livestock export; Live export; Transport of animals by sea; Livestock; FARM; DEFINITION; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105354
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The welfare of sheep transported by sea is a pertinent issue for Australia's agriculture industry and a subject of concern amongst the general public. Evaluating the effect of sea transport on the welfare of livestock requires an accurate system of reporting. This study piloted an animal welfare monitoring protocol during two sea voyages from Australia to the Middle East. Sheep health and behaviour were analysed to determine if the protocol could detect animal responses to voyage conditions such as feeding management and changes to the pen environment. Data were recorded for target pens of five different commercial lines of Merino sheep. Principle Components (PC) analysis on behavioural data identified three principal components which were compared with voyage day, management and environmental conditions using general linear mixed modelling (GLMM). PC factor 1 scores (23.35 % of total variance) showed that resting and recumbency increased as the voyage progressed. PC factor 2 scores (17.09 % variance) demonstrated that behavioural responses to heat fluctuated by voyage day. PC factor 3 scores (9.48 % variance) showed reduced flight distances and increasingly competitive feeding behaviour as the voyage progressed. Environment and management conditions were associated with behavioural changes, with Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) being the most influential measure affecting all three PC factors (p < 0.001). There were few diseases or symptoms of ill-health (including veterinary treatments) or mortalities recorded for sample pens; however, associations between ill-health and nutrition, environmental conditions and behaviour, were identified using GLMM. Increases in WBGT were linked to increased nasal discharge (p < 0.001), ocular discharge (p < 0.05), pink eye (p < 0.05) and Panting Score 4 (p < 0.01). With few recordings of ill-health, and a low mortality incidence, it was difficult to interpret the results of comparisons between health and behaviour. It is likely that associations between health indicators and behavioural variations will be more meaningful if a welfare monitoring protocol were applied to a larger sample size. The pen-side assessments presented in this study provided a practicable and comprehensive system for monitoring the behaviour and health of sheep during sea voyages. The application of such assessments on an industry basis could better inform all stakeholders about the welfare of sheep during sea transport.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Animal welfare indicators for sheep during sea transport: The effect of voyage day and time of day
    Willis, Renee S.
    Fleming, Patricia A.
    Dunston-Clarke, J.
    Barnes, Anne L.
    Miller, David W.
    Collins, Teresa
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2021, 238
  • [2] Animal welfare monitoring and livestock traceability during transport
    Di Pasquale, Adriano
    Isocrono, Enzo
    Possenti, Luigi
    Di Francesco, Cesare
    Di Donato, Walter
    Fiore, Gianluca
    Hofherr, Johann
    Natale, Fabrizio
    Bonavitacola, Fausto
    [J]. VETERINARIA ITALIANA, 2009, 45 (04) : 577 - 586
  • [3] Information monitoring system for surveillance of animal welfare during transport
    Gebresenbet, G
    Van de Water, G
    Geers, R
    [J]. PRECISION LIVESTOCK FARMING, 2003, : 53 - 57
  • [4] Sheep welfare during transport
    Trentini, R.
    Iannett, L.
    Di Nardo, A.
    Alessandrini, B.
    Villa, P. Dalla
    [J]. LARGE ANIMAL REVIEW, 2008, 14 (06): : 273 - 283
  • [5] Animal welfare - Government reviews animal welfare during transport
    不详
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 1999, 145 (09) : 238 - 238
  • [6] Effects of husbandry practices and animal welfare on reproductive indicators in sheep
    Veksler, Hess J.
    Schuh, A.
    Coppola, M.
    Decaminada, E.
    Miralles, M.
    Ghirardi, M.
    [J]. REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2008, 43 : 209 - 209
  • [7] Assessing the Validity of Animal-Based Indicators of Sheep Health and Welfare: Do Observers Agree?
    Phythian, Clare J.
    Michalopoulou, Eleni
    Duncan, Jennifer S.
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [8] Animal welfare during transport and slaughter
    Grandin, T
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE AND ANIMAL HEALTH, 2002, : 47 - 56
  • [9] Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep
    Zufferey, Romane
    Minnig, Adrian
    Thomann, Beat
    Zwygart, Sibylle
    Keil, Nina
    Schupbach, Gertraud
    Miserez, Raymond
    Zanolari, Patrik
    Stucki, Dimitri
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (10):
  • [10] A year of the Animal Health and Welfare Pathway: focus on sheep
    Russell, James
    Hobbs, Jonathan
    [J]. IN PRACTICE, 2023, 45 (10) : 619 - 625