Multimodal 2D, 2.5D & 3D face verification

被引:22
|
作者
Conde, Cristina [1 ]
Serrano, Angel [1 ]
Cabello, Enrique [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Face Recognit & Artificial Vis Grp, C Tulipan,s-n,Mostoles, E-28933 Madrid, Spain
关键词
biometrics; pattern recognition; image processing;
D O I
10.1109/ICIP.2006.312863
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A multimodal face verification process is presented for standard 2D color images, 2.5D range images and 3D meshes. A normalization in orientation and position is essential for 2.5D and 3D images to obtain a corrected frontal image. This is achieved using the spin images of the nose tip and both eyes, which feed an SVM classifier. First, a traditional Principal Component Analysis followed by an SVM classifier are applied to both 2D and 2.5D images. Second, an Iterative Closest Point algorithm is used to match 3D meshes. In all cases, the equal error rate is computed for different kinds of images in the training and test phases. In general, 2.5D range images show the best results (0.1% EER for frontal images). A special improvement in success rate for turned faces has been obtained for normalized 2.5D and 3D images compared to standard 2D images.
引用
收藏
页码:2061 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robust multimodal 2D and 3D face authentication using local feature fusion
    A. Ouamane
    M. Belahcene
    A. Benakcha
    S. Bourennane
    A. Taleb-Ahmed
    Signal, Image and Video Processing, 2016, 10 : 129 - 137
  • [32] 3D harnessing of light with 2.5D photonic crystals
    Viktorovitch, Pierre
    Ben Bakir, Badhise
    Boutami, Salim
    Leclercq, Jean-Louis
    Letartre, Xavier
    Rojo-Romeo, Pedro
    Seassal, Christian
    Zussy, Marc
    Di Cioccio, Lea
    Fedeli, Jean-Marc
    LASER & PHOTONICS REVIEWS, 2010, 4 (03) : 401 - 413
  • [33] Cost Comparison between 3D and 2.5D Integration
    Velenis, Dimitrios
    Detalle, Mikael
    Civale, Yann
    Marinissen, Erik Jan
    Beyer, Gerald
    Beyne, Eric
    2012 4TH ELECTRONIC SYSTEM-INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ESTC), 2012,
  • [34] 3D SoC integration, beyond 2.5D chiplets
    Beyne, Eric
    Milojevic, Dragomir
    Van der Plas, Geert
    Beyer, Gerald
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRON DEVICES MEETING (IEDM), 2021,
  • [35] 2.5D and 3D Heterogeneous Integration: Emerging applications
    Sheikh F.
    Nagisetty R.
    Karnik T.
    Kehlet D.
    IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine, 2021, 13 (04): : 77 - 87
  • [36] 网游的2.5D与3D之争
    房燕良
    程序员, 2010, (08) : 23 - 23
  • [37] 2.5D/3D Integration Technologies for Circuit Obfuscation
    Xie, Yang
    Bao, Chongxi
    Liu, Yuntao
    Srivastava, Ankur
    2016 17TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MICROPROCESSOR AND SOC TEST AND VERIFICATION (MTV), 2016, : 39 - 44
  • [38] Reliability Challenges for 2.5D/3D Integration: an Overview
    Premachandran, C. S.
    Choi, Seungman
    Cimino, Salvatore
    Thuy Tran-Quinn
    Burrell, Lloyd
    Justison, Patrick
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL RELIABILITY PHYSICS SYMPOSIUM (IRPS), 2018,
  • [39] Reliability Challenges in 2.5D and 3D IC Integration
    Li, Li
    Ton, Paul
    Nagar, Mohan
    Chia, Pierre
    2017 IEEE 67TH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ECTC 2017), 2017, : 1504 - 1509
  • [40] Design Issues in Heterogeneous 3D/2.5D Integration
    Milojevic, Dragomir
    Marchal, Pol
    Marinissen, Erik Jan
    Van der Plas, Geert
    Verkest, Diederik
    Beyne, Eric
    2013 18TH ASIA AND SOUTH PACIFIC DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE (ASP-DAC), 2013, : 403 - 410