A guiding framework for multi-stakeholder contracting in executive coaching

被引:12
|
作者
Burger, Zelda [1 ,2 ]
Van Coller-Peter, Salome [2 ]
机构
[1] Montage Leadership Dev, Durban, South Africa
[2] Stellenbosch Univ, Univ Stellenbosch Business Sch, Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
executive coaching; multi-stakeholder contracting; three-way session; three-and four-cornered meeting;
D O I
10.4102/sajhrm.v17i0.1114
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Orientation: Multi-stakeholder contracting provides a platform for the coaching stakeholders: the individual being coached (client), the organisation (sponsor and line manager) and the coach for achieving aligned outcomes within executive coaching. Contracting is not optimally implemented by stakeholders in all three phases of executive coaching (commencement, execution and conclusion). Research purpose: The research's purpose was to develop a guiding framework for multi-stakeholder contracting in each of the three phases of coaching. Motivation for the study: Stakeholders ensure outcomes achievement for the individual and the organisation in executive coaching. Limited research exists relating to the contractual elements and practices implemented by stakeholders during the three phases of coaching. Research approach/design and method: A qualitative, inductive, exploratory approach using purposive sampling was used to identify 12 participants, consisting of three: executive coaches, clients, line managers and sponsors from three corporate organisations. Participants were interviewed using a customised interview guide categorised into the three coaching phases. Main findings: Findings showed that contracting was included at the commencement coaching phase. The study indicated the advantages of contracting in all three coaching phases with all stakeholders emphasising phase-specific accountabilities. Practical/managerial implications: A guiding framework for multi-stakeholder contracting for each of the three phases of coaching could assist stakeholders; in particular human resource practitioners when contracting for executive coaching. Contribution/value-add: Outcomes alignment at the commencement phase, agreement on progress and results feedback during the execution and conclusion phases are enabled by implementing the guiding framework for multi-stakeholder contracting offered by this research.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Intelligent multi-stakeholder environmental management
    Mianabadi, Hojat
    Afshar, Abbas
    Zarghami, Mandi
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (01) : 862 - 866
  • [43] Supporting multi-stakeholder environmental decisions
    Hajkowicz, Stefan A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 88 (04) : 607 - 614
  • [44] MULTI-STAKEHOLDER DIPLOMACY IN THE SPIRIT OF GENEVA
    Lamb, Christopher
    REFUGEE SURVEY QUARTERLY, 2007, 26 (04) : 56 - 61
  • [45] Multi-Stakeholder Validation of an Entrustable Professional Activities Framework for Canadian Geriatrics Residency Programs
    Fisk, Derek C. P.
    Clendenning, Ben G.
    John, Philip D. St.
    Francois, Jose
    CANADIAN GERIATRICS JOURNAL, 2024, 27 (03) : 281 - 289
  • [46] Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale
    Sartas, Murat
    Schut, Marc
    Hermans, Frans
    van Asten, Piet
    Leeuwis, Cees
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [47] THE LANGUAGE OF EXECUTIVE COACHING: A DEVELOPMENTAL FRAMEWORK
    Joullie, Jean-Etienne
    Gould, Anthony M.
    Spillane, Robert
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2022, 21 (04) : 690 - 704
  • [48] Deliberation in Multi-Stakeholder Participation: A Heuristic Framework Applied to the Committee on World Food Security
    Zanella, Matheus Alves
    Goetz, Ariane
    Rist, Stephan
    Schmidt, Oscar
    Weigelt, Jes
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (02)
  • [49] Bridging Worlds: Utilizing a Multi-Stakeholder Framework to Create Extension-Tourism Partnerships
    Feyers, Shane
    Stein, Taylor
    Klizentyte, Kotryna
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [50] Multi-stakeholder Framework for Ecological Risk Management: Summary of a SETAC technical workshop - Preface
    Barton, A
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1999, 18 (02) : II - II