Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women - A randomized controlled trial

被引:113
|
作者
McDuffie, RS
Beck, A
Bischoff, K
Cross, J
Orleans, M
机构
[1] KAISER PERMANENTE,DEPT RES & DEV,DENVER,CO 80205
[2] UNIV COLORADO,HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT PREVENT MED & BIOMETR,DENVER,CO 80262
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.275.11.847
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives.-In 1989, the Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care established guidelines on the timing and content of prenatal care, including a schedule consisting of fewer prenatal visits than traditionally provided, for women at low risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. We tested the hypothesis that there are no significant increases in adverse perinatal outcomes when low-risk women are seen in a prenatal care visit schedule of fewer visits than routinely advised. Design.-Randomized controlled trial. Setting.-Group-model health maintenance organization. Patients.-A total of 2764 pregnant women, judged to be at low risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Interventions.-following risk assessment, participants were randomly assigned to an experimental schedule (nine visits) or a control schedule (14 visits) with additional visits as indicated or as desired by the patient. Main Outcome Measures.-Preterm delivery, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, low birth weight, and patients' satisfaction with care. Results.-On average, there were 2.7 fewer visits observed in the experimental group than in the control group. There were no significant increases in the main outcomes of the experimental group: preterm delivery (relative risk [RR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.27; P=.19), preeclampsia (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.14; P=.74), cesarean delivery (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.17, P=.25), and low birth weight (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.12; P=.76). There were no differences between the two groups in patients' satisfaction with quality of prenatal care. Conclusion.-In this study, good perinatal outcomes and patient satisfaction were maintained when the prenatal visit schedule proposed by the Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care was observed.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 851
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of international prenatal care guidelines for low-risk women to inform high-value care
    Peahl, Alex Friedman
    Heisler, Michele
    Essenmacher, Lydia K.
    Dalton, Vanessa K.
    Chopra, Vineet
    Admon, Lindsay K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (05) : 505 - 507
  • [32] An Intervention to Improve Mental Health and HIV Care Engagement Among Perinatal Women in Malawi: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bengtson, Angela M.
    Filipowicz, Teresa R.
    Mphonda, Steven
    Udedi, Michael
    Kulisewa, Kazione
    Meltzer-Brody, Samantha
    Gaynes, Bradley N.
    Go, Vivian F.
    Chibanda, Dixon
    Verhey, Ruth
    Hosseinipour, Mina C.
    Pence, Brian Wells
    AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2023, 27 (11) : 3559 - 3570
  • [33] Randomized trial of pragmatic education for low-risk COPD patients: impact on hospitalizations and emergency department visits
    Siddique, Haamid H.
    Olson, Raymond H.
    Parenti, Connie M.
    Rector, Thomas S.
    Caldwell, Michael
    Dewan, Naresh A.
    Rice, Kathryn L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2012, 7 : 719 - 728
  • [34] Effect of education and pill count on hemoglobin status during prenatal care in Nepalese women: A randomized controlled trial
    Adhikari, Kamala
    Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan
    Pradhan, Neelam
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 35 (03) : 459 - 466
  • [35] Retaining women in a prenatal care randomized controlled trial in Canada: implications for program planning
    Tough, Suzanne C.
    Siever, Jodi E.
    Johnston, David W.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 7 (1)
  • [36] Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: A Randomized controlled trial (vol 110, pg 330, 2007)
    Ickovics, J. R.
    Kershaw, T. S.
    Westdahl, C.
    Magriples, U.
    Massey, Z.
    Reynolds, H.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 110 (04): : 937 - 937
  • [37] Retaining women in a prenatal care randomized controlled trial in Canada: implications for program planning
    Suzanne C Tough
    Jodi E Siever
    David W Johnston
    BMC Public Health, 7
  • [38] The effect of intrauterine resuscitation by maternal hyperoxygenation on perinatal and maternal outcome: a randomized controlled trial
    Moors, Suzanne
    Bullens, Lauren M.
    Heimel, Pieter J. van Runnard
    Dieleman, Jeanne P.
    Kulik, Wim
    Bakkeren, Dirk L.
    van den Heuvel, Edwin R.
    Van der Hout-van der Jagt, M. Beatrijs
    Oei, S. Guid
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2020, 2 (02)
  • [39] Impact of educational strategies in low-risk prenatal care: systematic review of randomized clinical trials
    da Silva, Esther Pereira
    de Lima, Roberto Teixeira
    Osorio, Monica Maria
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2016, 21 (09): : 2935 - 2948
  • [40] Effect of Therapeutic Hypothermia on DNA Damage and Neurodevelopmental Outcome among Term Neonates with Perinatal Asphyxia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gane, Bahubali D.
    Bhat, Vishnu
    Rao, Ramachandra
    Nandhakumar, S.
    Harichandrakumar, K. T.
    Adhisivam, B.
    JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS, 2014, 60 (02) : 134 - 140