Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women - A randomized controlled trial

被引:113
|
作者
McDuffie, RS
Beck, A
Bischoff, K
Cross, J
Orleans, M
机构
[1] KAISER PERMANENTE,DEPT RES & DEV,DENVER,CO 80205
[2] UNIV COLORADO,HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT PREVENT MED & BIOMETR,DENVER,CO 80262
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.275.11.847
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives.-In 1989, the Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care established guidelines on the timing and content of prenatal care, including a schedule consisting of fewer prenatal visits than traditionally provided, for women at low risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. We tested the hypothesis that there are no significant increases in adverse perinatal outcomes when low-risk women are seen in a prenatal care visit schedule of fewer visits than routinely advised. Design.-Randomized controlled trial. Setting.-Group-model health maintenance organization. Patients.-A total of 2764 pregnant women, judged to be at low risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Interventions.-following risk assessment, participants were randomly assigned to an experimental schedule (nine visits) or a control schedule (14 visits) with additional visits as indicated or as desired by the patient. Main Outcome Measures.-Preterm delivery, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, low birth weight, and patients' satisfaction with care. Results.-On average, there were 2.7 fewer visits observed in the experimental group than in the control group. There were no significant increases in the main outcomes of the experimental group: preterm delivery (relative risk [RR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.27; P=.19), preeclampsia (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.14; P=.74), cesarean delivery (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.17, P=.25), and low birth weight (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.12; P=.76). There were no differences between the two groups in patients' satisfaction with quality of prenatal care. Conclusion.-In this study, good perinatal outcomes and patient satisfaction were maintained when the prenatal visit schedule proposed by the Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care was observed.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 851
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is the operative delivery rate in low-risk women dependent on birth care level? A randomised controlled trial
    Bernitz, Stine
    Rolland, Rune
    Blix, Ellen
    Jacobsen, Morten
    Sjoborg, Katrine
    Oian, Pal
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 91 : 44 - 45
  • [22] Is the operative delivery rate in low-risk women dependent on the level of birth care? A randomised controlled trial
    Bernitz, S.
    Rolland, R.
    Blix, E.
    Jacobsen, M.
    Sjoborg, K.
    Oian, P.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (11) : 1357 - 1364
  • [23] Low-intensity community supervision for low-risk offenders: a randomized, controlled trial
    Barnes, Geoffrey C.
    Ahlman, Lindsay
    Gill, Charlotte
    Sherman, Lawrence W.
    Kurtz, Ellen
    Malvestuto, Robert
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2010, 6 (02) : 159 - 189
  • [24] Low-intensity community supervision for low-risk offenders: a randomized, controlled trial
    Geoffrey C. Barnes
    Lindsay Ahlman
    Charlotte Gill
    Lawrence W. Sherman
    Ellen Kurtz
    Robert Malvestuto
    Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2010, 6 : 159 - 189
  • [25] The Effect of CenteringPregnancy Group Antenatal Care on Maternal, Birth, and Neonatal Outcomes Among Low-Risk Women in the Netherlands: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial
    Wagijo, Mary-ann
    Crone, Mathilde
    Zwicht, Birgit Bruinsma-van
    van Lith, Jan
    Billings, Deborah
    Rijnders, Marlies
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 69 (02) : 191 - 201
  • [26] A randomized trial of prenatal care using telemedicine for low-risk pregnancies: patient-related cost and time savings
    Barbour, Kelli Diane
    Nelson, Richard
    Esplin, M. Sean
    Varner, Michael
    Clark, Erin A. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S499 - S499
  • [27] Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Prenatal Care: Perinatal Outcomes Among Adolescents in New York City Health Centers
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    Earnshaw, Valerie
    Lewis, Jessica B.
    Kershaw, Trace S.
    Magriples, Urania
    Stasko, Emily
    Rising, Sharon Schindler
    Cassells, Andrea
    Cunningham, Shayna
    Bernstein, Peter
    Tobin, Jonathan N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 106 (02) : 359 - 365
  • [28] Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Prenatal Care: Perinatal Outcomes Among Adolescents in New York City Health Centers
    Truong, Mireille
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 127 (04): : 798 - 798
  • [29] Determinants of prenatal health care utilisation by low-risk women: A prospective cohort study
    Feijen-de Jong, Esther I.
    Jansen, Danielle E. M. C.
    Baarveld, Frank
    Boerleider, Agatha W.
    Spelten, Evelien
    Schellevis, Francois
    Reijneveld, Sijmen A.
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2015, 28 (02) : 87 - 94
  • [30] An Intervention to Improve Mental Health and HIV Care Engagement Among Perinatal Women in Malawi: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Angela M. Bengtson
    Teresa R. Filipowicz
    Steven Mphonda
    Michael Udedi
    Kazione Kulisewa
    Samantha Meltzer-Brody
    Bradley N. Gaynes
    Vivian F. Go
    Dixon Chibanda
    Ruth Verhey
    Mina C. Hosseinipour
    Brian Wells Pence
    AIDS and Behavior, 2023, 27 : 3559 - 3570