Effects of Central Corneal Stromal Thickness and Epithelial Thickness on Intraocular Pressure Using Goldmann Applanation and Non-Contact Tonometers

被引:21
|
作者
Lee, Marvin [1 ]
Ahn, Jaehong [2 ]
机构
[1] DMC Bundang Jesaeng Gen Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Songnam, South Korea
[2] Ajou Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Suwon 441749, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; GLAUCOMA; AGE; REDUCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0151868
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate whether corneal thickness parameters measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), such as central corneal thickness (CCT), central corneal stromal thickness (CCST), and central corneal epithelial thickness (CCET), influence the intraocular pressure (IOP) difference measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and non-contact tonometry (NCT). Methods In total, 50 eyes from 50 subjects without glaucomatous defects were included in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. We measured IOP using GAT and NCT and calculated the difference between the two methods. CCT was measured by a Cirrus HD-OCT device using anterior segment imaging. The basement membrane of the epithelium, which was seen as a high-reflection line in the OCT image, was taken as a reference line to measure CCST and CCET. Results The mean IOP measured by GAT and NCT was 16.7 +/- 3.0 and 18.1 +/- 3.8 mmHg, respectively. The mean IOP difference was 1.5 +/- 1.7 mmHg, and the IOP measured by NCT was 8.4% +/- 11.3% higher than that measured by GAT. The CCET and CCST were 57.9 +/- 5.6 and 501.7 +/- 33.8 mu m, respectively. CCT showed a positive correlation with both GAT IOP (r = 0.648, P < 0.001) and NCT IOP (r = 0.676, P < 0.001). Although CCST showed a significant correlation with GAT IOP and NCT IOP, CCET did not. The difference between GAT IOP and NCT IOP increased with CCT (r = 0.333, P = 0.018), and CCET was positively correlated with the IOP difference between GAT and NCT (r = 0.435, P = 0.002). Conclusions IOP increased with greater CCT, and CCST seemed to have a more important role than CCET. CCET also increased with greater CCT, and this may be a possible explanation for the increasing difference in IOP between GAT and NCT with increasing CCT.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Central corneal thickness, radius of the corneal curvature and intraocular pressure in normal subjects using non-contact techniques:: Reykjavik Eye Study
    Eysteinsson, T
    Jonasson, F
    Sasaki, H
    Arnarsson, A
    Sverrisson, T
    Sasaki, K
    Stefánsson, E
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 80 (01): : 11 - 15
  • [42] Comparison of two handheld applanation tonometers and the association of central corneal thickness, age, and intraocular pressure in normal and diseased canine eyes
    Kato, Kumiko
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 17 (06) : 417 - 425
  • [43] Central corneal thickness changes after Goldmann applanation tonometry and gonioscopy
    Evangelista, JA
    Oakman, JH
    Johnson, DL
    Tao, JP
    Trespalacios, R
    Hitch, AD
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [44] Corneal thickness and Intraocular pressure After DSAEK: comparison of Dynamic Contour tonometry with Goldmann Applanation tonometry
    Borges, Barbara
    Vicente, Andre
    Anjos, Rita
    Vieira, Luisa
    Santos, Arnaldo Dias
    Ferreira, Joana
    Maduro, Vitor
    Alves, Nuno
    Feijao, Joao
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [45] Comparison between the values of intra-ocular pressure measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer and Air-Puff non-contact tonometer and their relationship with central corneal thickness
    Javed, Anum
    Arshad, Muhammad Owais
    Nasir, Javeria
    Chatni, Muhammad Hanif
    Ayub, Bushra
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 72 (01) : 149 - 151
  • [46] Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen
    Bhan, A
    Browning, AC
    Shah, S
    Hamilton, R
    Dave, D
    Dua, HS
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2002, 43 (05) : 1389 - 1392
  • [47] Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness
    Tamcelik, Nevbahar
    Atalay, Eray
    Cicik, Erdogan
    Ozkok, Ahmet
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2015, 54 (01) : 18 - 25
  • [48] Intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness
    Manni, Gianluca
    Oddone, Francesco
    Parisi, Vincenzo
    Tosto, Adriana
    Centofanti, Marco
    GLAUCOMA: AN OPEN WINDOW TO NEURODEGENERATION AND NEUROPROTECTION, 2008, 173 : 25 - 30
  • [49] New Non-contact Tonometer HNT-1P Reliability: Comparing Intraocular Pressure, Central Corneal Thickness, and Corrected Intraocular Pressure
    Eah, Kyu Sang
    Shin, Joong Won
    Sung, Kyung Rim
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 61 (05): : 524 - 531
  • [50] Comparison of Non-Contact Methods for the Measurement of Central Corneal Thickness
    Gorgun, Ebru
    Yenerel, Nursal Melda
    Dinc, Umut Asli
    Oncel, Banu
    Kucumen, Raciha Beril
    Oral, Deniz
    Ciftci, Ferda
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING, 2011, 42 (05) : 400 - 407