Risk-Benefit Analysis of Bariatric Surgery

被引:4
|
作者
Ludwig, Kaja [1 ]
Schneider-Koriath, Sylke [1 ]
Bernhardt, Joern [1 ]
Huettl, Thomas P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Sudstadt Rostock, Chirurg Klin, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
[2] Chirurg Univ Klin & Poliklin Munchen Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
来源
VISZERALMEDIZIN | 2010年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
Bariatric surgery; Risk-benefit analysis; Comorbidity; LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY; LONG-TERM MORTALITY; GASTRIC BYPASS; OBESITY; WEIGHT; IMPACT; COHORT;
D O I
10.1159/000278167
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Risk-Benefit Analysis of Bariatric Surgery Discussions around a risk-benefit analysis of bariatric surgery focus particularly on the mortality risk, the impact of obesity-associated comorbidity and the associated health expenditure. The literature indicates that the adjusted risk of premature death in nonoperatively treated morbid obesity with a BMI > 35 kg/m(2) (or 40 kg/m(2)) is 29-40%. In contrast, 30-day lethality in bariatric surgery has fallen markedly in recent years and currently lies between 0.3 and 2%. Obesity-associated morbidity is markedly improved through surgery in line with the indications. It has been possible to demonstrate in this connection that the rate of cure or improvement for type II diabetics is between 38 and 100%, that for hypercholesterolemia between 30 and 94%, and that for hypertonic heart disease between 31 and 87%. Coexistent sleep apnea is cured in 71-100% of cases, and depressive illnesses are alleviated in approximately half the patients. Health expenditure falls in the postoperative follow-up through the optimization of obesity-associated comorbidity. It may therefore be assumed that, after modern bariatric surgery, the costs of the operation will be amortized in approximately 2-4 years. After this, annual health expenditure for nonoperatively treated patients rises by the factor 3-5. Taking these three aspects into account, there seem to be no conservative alternatives to indication-appropriate bariatric surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 25
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantitative risk-benefit analysis of natalizumab
    Thompson, J. P.
    Noyes, K.
    Dorsey, E. R.
    Schwid, S. R.
    Holloway, R. G.
    NEUROLOGY, 2008, 71 (05) : 357 - 364
  • [32] Hormones and cancer: Risk-benefit analysis
    Sevelda, P
    Salzer, H
    GYNAKOLOGISCH-GEBURTSHILFLICHE RUNDSCHAU, 1998, 38 (02): : 61 - 63
  • [33] QUANTITATIVE RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF NATALIZUMAB
    Steiner, Israel
    NEUROLOGY, 2009, 72 (20) : 1791 - 1791
  • [34] Risk-benefit analysis of fish consumption
    Leblanc, Jean-Charles
    Sirot, Veronique
    Volatier, Jean-Luc
    CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE, 2009, 44 (04): : 182 - 188
  • [35] A RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION
    BULPITT, CJ
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 69 (816) : 764 - 774
  • [36] A Risk-Benefit Analysis Is Coffee healthy?
    Richling, Elke
    Habermeyer, Michael
    CHEMIE IN UNSERER ZEIT, 2014, 48 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [37] RISK-BENEFIT AND COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS - REPLY
    NEMETZ, PN
    VINING, A
    POLICY SCIENCES, 1982, 14 (03) : 299 - 302
  • [38] Risk-Benefit Assessment of Surgery for Adult Scoliosis An Analysis Based on Patient Age
    Smith, Justin S.
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Berven, Sigurd H.
    Schwab, Frank J.
    Hamill, Christopher L.
    Horton, William C.
    Ondra, Stephen L.
    Sansur, Charles A.
    Bridwell, Keith H.
    SPINE, 2011, 36 (10) : 817 - 824
  • [39] Hypoabsorption in Bariatric Surgery: Is the Benefit Worth the Risk?
    Abedalqader, Tala
    Jawhar, Noura
    Gajjar, Aryan
    Portela, Ray
    Perrotta, Gerardo
    El Ghazal, Nour
    Laplante, Simon J.
    Ghanem, Omar M.
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2025, 61 (03):
  • [40] Unbalanced risk-benefit analysis of ADHD drugs
    Faltinsen, Erlend G.
    Gluud, Christian
    Simonsen, Erik
    Zwi, Morris
    Storebo, Ole Jakob
    LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 5 (11): : 870 - 870