Risk-Benefit Analysis of Bariatric Surgery

被引:4
|
作者
Ludwig, Kaja [1 ]
Schneider-Koriath, Sylke [1 ]
Bernhardt, Joern [1 ]
Huettl, Thomas P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Sudstadt Rostock, Chirurg Klin, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
[2] Chirurg Univ Klin & Poliklin Munchen Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
来源
VISZERALMEDIZIN | 2010年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
Bariatric surgery; Risk-benefit analysis; Comorbidity; LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY; LONG-TERM MORTALITY; GASTRIC BYPASS; OBESITY; WEIGHT; IMPACT; COHORT;
D O I
10.1159/000278167
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Risk-Benefit Analysis of Bariatric Surgery Discussions around a risk-benefit analysis of bariatric surgery focus particularly on the mortality risk, the impact of obesity-associated comorbidity and the associated health expenditure. The literature indicates that the adjusted risk of premature death in nonoperatively treated morbid obesity with a BMI > 35 kg/m(2) (or 40 kg/m(2)) is 29-40%. In contrast, 30-day lethality in bariatric surgery has fallen markedly in recent years and currently lies between 0.3 and 2%. Obesity-associated morbidity is markedly improved through surgery in line with the indications. It has been possible to demonstrate in this connection that the rate of cure or improvement for type II diabetics is between 38 and 100%, that for hypercholesterolemia between 30 and 94%, and that for hypertonic heart disease between 31 and 87%. Coexistent sleep apnea is cured in 71-100% of cases, and depressive illnesses are alleviated in approximately half the patients. Health expenditure falls in the postoperative follow-up through the optimization of obesity-associated comorbidity. It may therefore be assumed that, after modern bariatric surgery, the costs of the operation will be amortized in approximately 2-4 years. After this, annual health expenditure for nonoperatively treated patients rises by the factor 3-5. Taking these three aspects into account, there seem to be no conservative alternatives to indication-appropriate bariatric surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 25
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RISK-BENEFIT
    MARTIN, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 174 (07) : 691 - 691
  • [22] Prostate Biopsy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis
    Loeb, Stacy
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03): : 852 - 853
  • [23] Best Practices in Risk-Benefit Analysis
    Verhagen, H.
    Tijhuis, M.
    Gunnlaugsdottir, H.
    Kalogeras, N.
    Leino, O.
    Lutejin, J.
    Magnusson, S.
    Odekerken, G.
    Pohjola, M.
    Tuomisto, J.
    Ueland, O.
    White, B.
    Holm, F.
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2011, 58 : 415 - 415
  • [24] NEW ANTIMALARIALS - A RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    NOSTEN, F
    PRICE, RN
    DRUG SAFETY, 1995, 12 (04) : 264 - 273
  • [25] Losing the balance in risk-benefit analysis
    Rehani, Madan M.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2023, 43 (02)
  • [26] THE ILEOANAL POUCH - A RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    KOHLER, L
    TROIDL, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (04) : 443 - 447
  • [27] BRAFO -: Risk-benefit analysis of foods
    Boobis, Alan
    Contor, Laura
    Kind, Paul
    Mueller, Detlef
    Rechkemmer, Gerhard
    Verhagen, Hans
    Szoradi, Andras
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2007, 51 : 393 - 394
  • [28] Labour analgesia - A risk-benefit analysis
    Eberle, RL
    Norris, MC
    DRUG SAFETY, 1996, 14 (04) : 239 - 251
  • [29] ADVICE AND CONSENT + RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BONINE, JE
    ATLANTIC, 1979, 243 (05): : 31 - 31
  • [30] Basic aspects of risk-benefit analysis
    Beckmann, J
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 1999, 25 (01): : 89 - 95