Stent Lumen Visibility in Single-energy CT Angiography: Does Tube Potential Matter?

被引:2
|
作者
Boos, Johannes [1 ,2 ]
Kropil, Patric [2 ]
Lanzman, Rotem Shlomo [2 ]
Aissa, Joel [2 ]
Schleich, Christoph [2 ]
Antoch, Gerald [2 ]
Thomas, Christoph [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Fac Med, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Imaging; Computed tomography; Stents; Phantom; Contrast medium; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL-DISEASE; IMAGE QUALITY; CORONARY STENTS; LOWER-EXTREMITY; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2016.03.012
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: There has been a trend toward lowering tube potential in computed tomography angiography (CTA) examinations to reduce radiation dose or contrast medium dose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of tube potential on peripheral artery in-stent lumen visibility in CTA examinations. Materials and Methods: Nine different peripheral artery stents were placed in a vessel phantom (inner diameter: 5 mm, surrounded by water) and scanned consecutively using a 128-row CT scanner with 70, 80, 100, 120, and 140 kV and two different concentrations of contrast medium to simulate contrast enhanced blood. Medium-smooth and ultra-sharp reconstruction kernels with filtered back projection (B30f, B46f) and iterative reconstruction technique (130f, 146f) were used. Visible in-stent lumen diameter and artifact width were evaluated using a semiautomatic software tool. All stents were scanned with digital angiography, which was regarded as the reference standard. Results: Averaged over all stents, visible in-stent lumen diameter ranged from 1.30 +/- 0.21 mm (CM2/70 kV/I30f) to 3.13 +/- 0.32 mm (CM1/120 kV/146f). In-stent lumen diameters were significantly higher for 120 and 140 kV compared to 70 kV (2.39 +/- 0.73 and 2.39 +/- 0.66 mm vs 1.99 +/- 0.69 mm; P = 0.01 and P = 0.005). Ultra-sharp reconstruction kernels lead to significantly better in-stent lumen visibility than smooth reconstruction kernels (B46f: 2.74 +/- 0.34 mm vs B30f: 1.57 +/- 0.36 mm; P < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, in-stent lumen visibility was improved for iterative reconstructions compared to filtered back projection (146f: 2.93 +/- 0.30 mm vs B46f: 2.74 +/- 0.34 mm; P < 0.001). Contrast medium concentration did not influence in-stent lumen visibility. Conclusions: Despite all known benefits of low kV CTA protocols, the use of a very low tube potential may hamper in-stent lumen visibility. A sharp kernel may be of value when evaluating the inner lumen of vascular stents.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 759
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography - Does gender matter? Reply
    Bartlett, Eric S.
    Walters, Thomas D.
    Symons, Sean P.
    Fox, Allan J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2006, 27 (08) : 1601 - 1601
  • [42] Estimating dual-energy CT imaging from single-energy CT data with material decomposition convolutional neural network ?
    Lyu, Tianling
    Zhao, Wei
    Zhu, Yinsu
    Wu, Zhan
    Zhang, Yikun
    Chen, Yang
    Luo, Limin
    Li, Shuo
    Xing, Lei
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2021, 70
  • [43] CT Angiography by Reduced Tube Voltage More Than a Single Step
    Min, James K.
    LaBounty, Troy M.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2009, 2 (08) : 947 - 949
  • [44] Assessment of coronary stent in vitro on multislice computed tomography angiography: Improved in-stent visibility by the use of 140-kV tube voltage
    Suzuki, Shigeru
    Furui, Shigeru
    Kuwahara, Sadatoshi
    Kaminaga, Tatsuro
    Yamauchi, Teiyu
    Kawasaki, Tsutomu
    Konno, Kumiko
    Kozuma, Ken
    Isshiki, Takaaki
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2007, 31 (03) : 414 - 421
  • [45] The Effect of Beam Overlapping in Dual-Energy Volume CT Scans and Single-Energy Helical Scans
    Correa, N.
    Barreto, I.
    Arreola, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E648 - E648
  • [46] Comparison of metal artifact reduction using single-energy CT and dual-energy CT with various metallic implants in cadavers
    Barreto, Izabella
    Pepin, Eric
    Davis, Ivan
    Dean, Cooper
    Massini, Tara
    Rees, John
    Olguin, Catherine
    Quails, Nathan
    Correa, Nathalie
    Rill, Lynn
    Arreola, Manuel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 133
  • [47] Virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT compared to single-energy CT of the urinary tract: a prospective study
    Lundin, Margareta
    Liden, Mats
    Magnuson, Anders
    Mohammed, Ahmed Abdulilah
    Geijer, Hakan
    Andersson, Torbjorn
    Persson, Anders
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2012, 53 (06) : 689 - 694
  • [48] Dual-energy CT for the detection of skull base invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of simulated single-energy CT and MRI
    Zhan, Yang
    Wang, Peng
    Wang, Yuzhe
    Wang, Yin
    Tang, Zuohua
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [49] Deep-learned generation of renal dual-energy CT from a single-energy scan
    Sheikhi, M.
    Sina, S.
    Karimipourfard, M.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 79 (01) : e17 - e25
  • [50] A THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS OF THE ACCURACY OF SINGLE-ENERGY CT BONE-MINERAL MEASUREMENTS
    CRAWLEY, EO
    EVANS, WD
    OWEN, GM
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1988, 33 (10): : 1113 - 1127