Stent Lumen Visibility in Single-energy CT Angiography: Does Tube Potential Matter?

被引:2
|
作者
Boos, Johannes [1 ,2 ]
Kropil, Patric [2 ]
Lanzman, Rotem Shlomo [2 ]
Aissa, Joel [2 ]
Schleich, Christoph [2 ]
Antoch, Gerald [2 ]
Thomas, Christoph [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Fac Med, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Imaging; Computed tomography; Stents; Phantom; Contrast medium; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL-DISEASE; IMAGE QUALITY; CORONARY STENTS; LOWER-EXTREMITY; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2016.03.012
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: There has been a trend toward lowering tube potential in computed tomography angiography (CTA) examinations to reduce radiation dose or contrast medium dose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of tube potential on peripheral artery in-stent lumen visibility in CTA examinations. Materials and Methods: Nine different peripheral artery stents were placed in a vessel phantom (inner diameter: 5 mm, surrounded by water) and scanned consecutively using a 128-row CT scanner with 70, 80, 100, 120, and 140 kV and two different concentrations of contrast medium to simulate contrast enhanced blood. Medium-smooth and ultra-sharp reconstruction kernels with filtered back projection (B30f, B46f) and iterative reconstruction technique (130f, 146f) were used. Visible in-stent lumen diameter and artifact width were evaluated using a semiautomatic software tool. All stents were scanned with digital angiography, which was regarded as the reference standard. Results: Averaged over all stents, visible in-stent lumen diameter ranged from 1.30 +/- 0.21 mm (CM2/70 kV/I30f) to 3.13 +/- 0.32 mm (CM1/120 kV/146f). In-stent lumen diameters were significantly higher for 120 and 140 kV compared to 70 kV (2.39 +/- 0.73 and 2.39 +/- 0.66 mm vs 1.99 +/- 0.69 mm; P = 0.01 and P = 0.005). Ultra-sharp reconstruction kernels lead to significantly better in-stent lumen visibility than smooth reconstruction kernels (B46f: 2.74 +/- 0.34 mm vs B30f: 1.57 +/- 0.36 mm; P < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, in-stent lumen visibility was improved for iterative reconstructions compared to filtered back projection (146f: 2.93 +/- 0.30 mm vs B46f: 2.74 +/- 0.34 mm; P < 0.001). Contrast medium concentration did not influence in-stent lumen visibility. Conclusions: Despite all known benefits of low kV CTA protocols, the use of a very low tube potential may hamper in-stent lumen visibility. A sharp kernel may be of value when evaluating the inner lumen of vascular stents.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 759
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A deep learning approach for dual-energy CT imaging using a single-energy CT data
    Zhao, Wei
    Lv, Tianling
    Gao, Peng
    Shen, Liyue
    Dai, Xianjin
    Cheng, Kai
    Jia, Mengyu
    Chen, Yang
    Xing, Lei
    15TH INTERNATIONAL MEETING ON FULLY THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION IN RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 11072
  • [22] Does dual-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) have improved image quality over routine single-energy CTPA?
    Chen, Tony
    Xiao, Hao
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 63 (02) : 170 - 174
  • [23] CT detection of myocardial blood volume deficits: Dual-energy CT compared with single-energy CT spectra
    Arnoldi, Elisabeth
    Lee, Yeong Shyan
    Ruzsics, Balazs
    Weininger, Markus
    Spears, J. Reid
    Rowley, Christopher P.
    Chiaramida, Salvatore A.
    Costello, Philip
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2011, 5 (06) : 421 - 429
  • [24] A critical look at the stoichiometric single-energy CT calibration for proton therapy
    Goma, C.
    Almeida, I. P.
    Verhaegen, F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S1139 - S1140
  • [25] CT Detection of Myocardial Blood Volume Deficits: Dual-Energy CT Compared With Single-Energy CT Spectra
    Arnoldi, Elisabeth
    Ruzsics, Balazs
    Lee, Yeong Shyan
    Gebregziabher, Mulugeta
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Costello, Philip
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (18) : S375 - S375
  • [26] Evaluation of the best single-energy scanning in energy spectrum CT in lower extremity arteriography
    Wang, Guokun
    Zhao, Deli
    Ling, Zaisheng
    Wang, Haibo
    Yu, Shanshan
    Zhang, Jinling
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2019, 18 (02) : 1433 - 1439
  • [27] Iterative reconstruction in single source dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography: Is it sufficient to achieve a radiation dose as low as state-of-the-art single-energy CTPA?
    Ohana, M.
    Labani, A.
    Jeung, M. Y.
    El Ghannudi, S.
    Gaertner, S.
    Roy, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (11) : 2314 - 2320
  • [28] Does CT Angiography Matter for Patients with Cervical Spine Injuries?
    Hagedorn, John C., II
    Emery, Sanford E.
    France, John C.
    Daffner, Scott D.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (11): : 951 - 955
  • [29] Conversion of single-energy CT to parametric maps of dual-energy CT using convolutional neural network
    Kim, Sangwook
    Lee, Jimin
    Kim, Jungye
    Kim, Bitbyeol
    Choi, Chang Heon
    Jung, Seongmoon
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 97 (1158): : 1180 - 1190
  • [30] Multi-Energy Low-Kiloelectron Volt versus Single-Energy Low-Kilovolt Images for Endoleak Detection at CT Angiography of the Aorta
    Landsmann, Anna
    Sartoretti, Thomas
    Mergen, Victor
    Jungblut, Lisa
    Eberhard, Matthias
    Kobe, Adrian
    Alkadhi, Hatem
    Euler, Andre
    RADIOLOGY-CARDIOTHORACIC IMAGING, 2024, 6 (02):