Stent Lumen Visibility in Single-energy CT Angiography: Does Tube Potential Matter?

被引:2
|
作者
Boos, Johannes [1 ,2 ]
Kropil, Patric [2 ]
Lanzman, Rotem Shlomo [2 ]
Aissa, Joel [2 ]
Schleich, Christoph [2 ]
Antoch, Gerald [2 ]
Thomas, Christoph [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Fac Med, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Imaging; Computed tomography; Stents; Phantom; Contrast medium; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL-DISEASE; IMAGE QUALITY; CORONARY STENTS; LOWER-EXTREMITY; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2016.03.012
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: There has been a trend toward lowering tube potential in computed tomography angiography (CTA) examinations to reduce radiation dose or contrast medium dose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of tube potential on peripheral artery in-stent lumen visibility in CTA examinations. Materials and Methods: Nine different peripheral artery stents were placed in a vessel phantom (inner diameter: 5 mm, surrounded by water) and scanned consecutively using a 128-row CT scanner with 70, 80, 100, 120, and 140 kV and two different concentrations of contrast medium to simulate contrast enhanced blood. Medium-smooth and ultra-sharp reconstruction kernels with filtered back projection (B30f, B46f) and iterative reconstruction technique (130f, 146f) were used. Visible in-stent lumen diameter and artifact width were evaluated using a semiautomatic software tool. All stents were scanned with digital angiography, which was regarded as the reference standard. Results: Averaged over all stents, visible in-stent lumen diameter ranged from 1.30 +/- 0.21 mm (CM2/70 kV/I30f) to 3.13 +/- 0.32 mm (CM1/120 kV/146f). In-stent lumen diameters were significantly higher for 120 and 140 kV compared to 70 kV (2.39 +/- 0.73 and 2.39 +/- 0.66 mm vs 1.99 +/- 0.69 mm; P = 0.01 and P = 0.005). Ultra-sharp reconstruction kernels lead to significantly better in-stent lumen visibility than smooth reconstruction kernels (B46f: 2.74 +/- 0.34 mm vs B30f: 1.57 +/- 0.36 mm; P < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, in-stent lumen visibility was improved for iterative reconstructions compared to filtered back projection (146f: 2.93 +/- 0.30 mm vs B46f: 2.74 +/- 0.34 mm; P < 0.001). Contrast medium concentration did not influence in-stent lumen visibility. Conclusions: Despite all known benefits of low kV CTA protocols, the use of a very low tube potential may hamper in-stent lumen visibility. A sharp kernel may be of value when evaluating the inner lumen of vascular stents.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 759
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Initial experience with single-source dual-energy CT abdominal angiography and comparison with single-energy CT angiography: image quality, enhancement, diagnosis and radiation dose
    Daniella F. Pinho
    Naveen M. Kulkarni
    Arun Krishnaraj
    Sanjeeva P. Kalva
    Dushyant V. Sahani
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 351 - 359
  • [2] Initial experience with single-source dual-energy CT abdominal angiography and comparison with single-energy CT angiography: image quality, enhancement, diagnosis and radiation dose
    Pinho, Daniella F.
    Kulkarni, Naveen M.
    Krishnaraj, Arun
    Kalva, Sanjeeva P.
    Sahani, Dushyant V.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (02) : 351 - 359
  • [3] Assessment of Calcified Carotid Plaque Volume: Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Energy CT Angiography and Native Single-Energy CT
    Watanabe, Yoshiyuki
    Nakazawa, Tetsuro
    Higashi, Masahiro
    Itoh, Toshihide
    Naito, Hiroaki
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (06) : W796 - W799
  • [4] Comparison of the effect of radiation exposure from dual-energy CT versus single-energy CT on double-strand breaks at CT pulmonary angiography
    Tao, Shu Min
    Li, Xie
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    Nance, John W., Jr.
    Jacobs, Brian E.
    Zhou, Chang Sheng
    Gu, Hai Feng
    Lu, Meng Jie
    Lu, Guang Ming
    Zhang, Long Jiang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 101 : 92 - 96
  • [5] Dual- versus Single-Energy CT-Angiography Imaging for Patients Undergoing Intracranial Aneurysm Repair
    Abdulazim, Amr
    Rubbert, Christian
    Reichelt, Dorothea
    Mathys, Christian
    Turowski, Bernd
    Steiger, Hans-Jakob
    Haenggi, Daniel
    Etminan, Nima
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 43 (5-6) : 272 - 282
  • [6] Impact of iodinated contrast media concentration on image quality for dual-energy CT and single-energy CT with low tube voltage settings
    Sookpeng, Supawitoo
    Martin, Colin J.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2023, 64 (03) : 1047 - 1055
  • [7] Dual-energy CT angiography of abdomen with routine concentration contrast agent in comparison with conventional single-energy CT with high concentration contrast agent
    He, Jingzhen
    Wang, Qing
    Ma, Xiangxing
    Sun, Zhiyuan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (02) : 221 - 227
  • [8] Single-energy metal artifact reduction technique for reducing metallic coil artifacts on post-interventional cerebral CT and CT angiography
    Katsura, Masaki
    Sato, Jiro
    Akahane, Masaaki
    Tajima, Taku
    Furuta, Toshihiro
    Mori, Harushi
    Abe, Osamu
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2018, 60 (11) : 1141 - 1150
  • [9] Single-energy metal artifact reduction technique for reducing metallic coil artifacts on post-interventional cerebral CT and CT angiography
    Masaki Katsura
    Jiro Sato
    Masaaki Akahane
    Taku Tajima
    Toshihiro Furuta
    Harushi Mori
    Osamu Abe
    Neuroradiology, 2018, 60 : 1141 - 1150
  • [10] Single-Energy Metal Artifact Reduction (SEMAR) in Ultra-High-Resolution CT Angiography of Patients with Intracranial Implants
    Jabas, Abdullah
    Mercado, Mario Alberto Abello
    Altmann, Sebastian
    Ringel, Florian
    Booz, Christian
    Kronfeld, Andrea
    Sanner, Antoine P.
    Brockmann, Marc A.
    Othman, Ahmed E.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (04)