Patient Outcomes Following Implantation of Modular Neck Hip Prostheses in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:2
|
作者
Borden, Robert [1 ]
Pour, Aidin Eslam [1 ]
Murayama, Takayuki [1 ]
Blaha, J. David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
adverse tissue response to metal debris; corrosion; modular neck femoral stem; pseudotumor; total hip arthroplasty; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1520/STP159120140151
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Bimodular femoral neck components were introduced to optimize implant size and offset. Failures have been reported and long-term outcome of modular necks must be assessed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the results of a series of modular neck implants and catalog the causes of failure of them. Our series included 277 hips (244 patients) with Profemur-E and Profemur-Z femoral stems (Wright Medical Technology Inc., now MicroPort Orthopaedics Arlington, TN). Data for this cohort of patients included demographics, implant dimensions, and the type of articular surface. Correlation of these variables with failure was analyzed to estimate the effect of each on survivorship. Implant failure was defined as cases requiring revision surgery. Seven cases were revised for implant neck fracture (2.5 %), and four were revised for adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR; 1.4 %). Seven required replacement of fractured neck with a cobalt-chromium (CoCr) modular neck. Regression analysis showed that a 1-unit increase in body mass index (BMI) increased the probability of neck fracture by a factor of 1.19 and every 4-mm increase in head diameter increased the chance of neck fracture by a factor of 3.2. Increase in neck offset is associated with a 1.83 times increased likelihood of neck fracture. Co levels correlated positively with neck fracture, and titanium levels correlated positively with gas in the joint. Cr and titanium levels were significantly higher in patients who had aseptic revision surgery. These data suggest that failure of modular neck junctions may be potentiated by higher BMI, greater offset, and larger head diameters. It is suspected that these factors contribute to modular neck failure by creating a stronger moment arm about the neck's insertion into the stem. A lower level of titanium than 7 ng/dL might be considered as the threshold. These data may help identify a set of factors that contraindicate the use of modular neck junctions.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 25
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not a Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Raiford, Mattie E.
    Barra, Matthew F.
    Myers, Thomas G.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 29 (03)
  • [22] Survivorship and Outcomes of Femoral Neck Preserving Stems in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Reddy, Gireesh B.
    Haziza, Sagie
    Constantinescu, David S.
    Pagan, Dianne N.
    Schneiderbauer, Michaela M.
    Robinson, Raymond P.
    Hernandez, Victor H.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (08): : 1606 - 1611
  • [23] Systematic review of primary total hip arthroplasty using titanium-titanium modular-neck prostheses: the true risk of revision
    Lex, Johnathan R.
    Welch, Matthew D.
    See, Abbas
    Edwards, Thomas C.
    Stavropoulos, Nikolaos A.
    Babis, George C.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 31 (03) : 295 - 303
  • [24] Effects of Cobalt and Chromium Levels Following Modular Hip Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Koziara, Christopher R.
    Lombardo, Daniel J.
    Petersen-Fitts, Graysen R.
    Jildeh, Toufic R.
    Morawa, Lawrence
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 39 (05) : 288 - 292
  • [25] Midterm Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Revision Hip System
    Smith, Marie Anne
    Deakin, Angela H.
    Allen, David
    Baines, Joe
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (02): : 446 - 450
  • [26] FAILURE OF THREE CEMENTLESS MODULAR TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY PROSTHESES: A RETRIEVAL ANALYSIS
    Paliwal, Manish
    Allan, D. Gordon
    Filip, Peter
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION 2008, VOL 2, 2009, : 97 - 105
  • [27] Conversion total hip arthroplasty: Primary or revision total hip arthroplasty
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    Baghoolizadeh, Mahta
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 6 (10): : 750 - 753
  • [28] Modular versus Nonmodular Neck Femoral Implants in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Which is Better?
    Duwelius, Paul J.
    Burkhart, Bob
    Carnahan, Clay
    Branam, Grant
    Ko, Laura Matsen
    Wu, YingXing
    Froemke, Cecily
    Wang, Lian
    Grunkemeier, Gary
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (04) : 1240 - 1245
  • [29] Midterm outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with a modular Birmingham head
    Cushnie, Duncan W.
    Lanting, Brent A.
    McCalden, Richard
    Naudie, Douglas D. R.
    Howard, James L.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 31 (01) : 103 - 108
  • [30] The Association of Season of Surgery and Patient Reported Outcomes following Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Lachance, Andrew D.
    Call, Catherine
    Radford, Zachary
    Stoddard, Henry
    Sturgeon, Callahan
    Babikian, George
    Rana, Adam
    McGrory, Brian J.
    GERIATRIC ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2024, 15