How strongly does statistical reasoning influence knowledge and acceptance of evolution?

被引:16
|
作者
Fiedler, Daniela [1 ]
Sbeglia, Gena C. [2 ]
Nehm, Ross H. [2 ]
Harms, Ute [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Leibniz Inst Sci & Math Educ IPN, Dept Biol Educ, Olshausenstr 62, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
evolution; randomness and probability; threshold concepts; undergraduates; STUDENTS CONCEPTUAL ECOLOGIES; NATURAL-SELECTION; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; BIOLOGY TEACHERS; RASCH ANALYSIS; SCIENCE; INVENTORY; BELIEFS; MATH; RANDOMNESS;
D O I
10.1002/tea.21547
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A large body of research has examined students' conceptions of evolution and their relationships to acceptance of evolution. Proficiency in statistical and probabilistic reasoning has long been considered to be an essential feature of evolutionary reasoning, yet almost no empirical work has explored these putative connections. The RaPro instruments have recently been developed to measure statistical reasoning in the contexts of mathematics (RaProMath) and evolution (RaProEvo). Our study provides additional validation of these instruments using Rasch analysis and quantifies the contribution of statistical reasoning to both understanding and accepting evolution. We recruited a large sample (N=564) of undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory biology course at a large public research university in the United States. Students completed a suite of published instruments that assessed statistical reasoning, evolutionary understanding, and evolutionary acceptance. Our findings indicate that validity inferences derived from RaPro scores generalized to the new sample, and that proficiency in statistical reasoning explained 28% of the variance in evolutionary knowledge and 19% of the variation in evolutionary acceptance. The inclusion of demographic variables into the model significantly increased the explained variance in acceptance. Notably, the variance in evolution acceptance explained by statistical reasoning was comparable to that of thinking dispositions or evolutionary knowledge reported in the literature. This work provides the first large-scale evidence of the role of statistical reasoning in evolutionary knowledge and acceptance and motivates future work to explore how statistical literacy should be integrated into evolution education efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1206
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How strongly does the exchange rate influence Swiss agri-food exports?
    Kohler, Andreas
    Ferjani, Ali
    AGRARFORSCHUNG SCHWEIZ, 2015, 6 (05): : 196 - 201
  • [22] Reasoning with Contextual Knowledge and Influence Diagrams
    Acar, Erman
    Penaloza, Rafael
    KR2020: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRINCIPLES OF KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING, 2020, : 12 - 21
  • [23] How Does the Local Knowledge of Scientists Influence Their Impact on Governance Performance?
    Yang, Lihua
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 48 (03) : 334 - 351
  • [24] How does orthographic knowledge influence performance on phonological awareness tasks?
    Castles, A
    Holmes, VM
    Neath, J
    Kinoshita, S
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 56 (03): : 445 - 467
  • [25] Does impulsivity influence performance in reasoning?
    Schweizer, K
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2002, 33 (07) : 1031 - 1043
  • [26] University faculty and their knowledge & acceptance of biological evolution
    Rice J.W.
    Clough M.P.
    Olson J.K.
    Adams D.C.
    Colbert J.T.
    Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2015, 8 (1)
  • [27] How Strongly Does Intention Predict Behavior?
    Ruppar, Todd M.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2024, 46 (03) : 163 - 163
  • [28] How Does Education Hone Reasoning Ability?
    Bunge, Silvia A.
    Leib, Elena R.
    CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 29 (02) : 167 - 173
  • [29] Localized Spillovers and Knowledge Flows: How Does Proximity Influence the Performance of Plants?
    Eriksson, Rikard H.
    ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 87 (02) : 127 - 152