An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

被引:5
|
作者
Vaganian, Lusine [1 ]
Bussmann, Sonja [1 ]
Boecker, Maren [2 ]
Kusch, Michael [3 ]
Labouvie, Hildegard [3 ]
Gerlach, Alexander L. [1 ]
Cwik, Jan C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Fac Human Sci, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Pohligstr 1, D-50969 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp RWTH Aachen, Inst Med Psychol & Med Sociol, Aachen, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Internal Med, Sect Clin Psychooncol Working Grp Psychooncol Hlt, Cologne, Germany
关键词
WHODAS; 2; 0; Disability; Cancer; Rasch analysis; Psychometric properties; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; VERSION; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-021-02872-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The World Health Organization Disability Assessent Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) assesses disability in individuals irrespective of their health condition. Previous studies validated the usefulness of the WHODAS 2.0 using classical test theory. This study is the first investigating the psychometric properties of the 12-items WHODAS 2.0 in patients with cancer using item analysis according to the Rasch model. Methods In total, 350 cancer patients participated in the study. Rasch analysis of the 12-items version of the WHODAS 2.0 was conducted and included testing unidimensionality, local independence, and testing for differential item functioning (DIF) with regard to age, gender, type of cancer, presence of metastases, psycho-oncological support, and duration of disease. Results After accounting for local dependence, which was mainly found across items of the same WHODAS domain, satisfactory overall fit to the Rasch model was established (chi(2) = 36.14, p = 0.07) with good reliability (PSI = 0.82) and unidimensionality of the scale. DIF was found for gender (testlet 'Life activities') and age (testlet 'Getting around/Self-care'), but the size of DIF was not substantial. Conclusion Overall, the analysis results according to the Rasch model support the use of the WHODAS 2.0 12-item version as a measure of disability in cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2929 / 2938
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinic
    Aki Fujiwara
    Mitsuru Ida
    Katsuhiro Kimoto
    Keisuke Watanabe
    Masahiko Kawaguchi
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2021, 35 : 81 - 85
  • [42] Validation of the 36-item and 12-item self-report World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in individuals with autism spectrum disorder
    Park, Shin Ho
    Demetriou, Eleni A.
    Pepper, Karen L.
    Song, Yun Ju C.
    Thomas, Emma E.
    Hickie, Ian B.
    Glozier, Nick
    Guastella, Adam J.
    AUTISM RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (07) : 1101 - 1111
  • [43] Validation of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in individuals with schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and diabetes in Singapore
    Abdin, Edimansyah
    Seet, Vanessa
    Jeyagurunathan, Anitha
    Tan, Sing Chik
    Mok, Yee Ming
    Verma, Swapna
    Lee, Eng Sing
    Subramaniam, Mythily
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11):
  • [44] Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders
    Holmberg, Christopher
    Gremyr, Andreas
    Torgerson, Jarl
    Mehlig, Kirsten
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [45] Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinic
    Fujiwara, Aki
    Ida, Mitsuru
    Kimoto, Katsuhiro
    Watanabe, Keisuke
    Kawaguchi, Masahiko
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2021, 35 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [46] Comparison of the responsiveness of the WOMAC and the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin-Beck disease
    Yang, Lei
    Wang, Dimiao
    Li, Xiuxia
    Yuan, Hangjing
    Fang, Hua
    Guo, Xiong
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [47] Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders
    Christopher Holmberg
    Andreas Gremyr
    Jarl Torgerson
    Kirsten Mehlig
    BMC Psychiatry, 21
  • [48] Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability - systematic review
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    Katajapuu, Niina
    Barlund, Esa
    Laimi, Katri
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (06) : 789 - 794
  • [49] What Score in WHODAS 2.0 12-Item Interviewer Version Corresponds to 40 % Psychiatric Disability? A Comparative Study Against IDEAS
    Basavarajappa C.
    Kumar K.S.
    Suresh V.C.
    Kumar C.N.
    Ravishankar V.
    Vanamoorthy U.
    Mehta U.
    Waghmare A.
    Thanapal S.
    Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health, 2016, 3 (1) : 21 - 26
  • [50] Validity of the 36-item Persian (Farsi) version of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS) 2.0
    Rajeziesfahani, Sepideh
    Federici, Stefano
    Bacci, Silvia
    Meloni, Fabio
    Bartolucci, Francesco
    Zahiroddin, Alireza
    Shams, Jamal
    Noorbakhsh, Simasadat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 48 (01) : 14 - 39