An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

被引:5
|
作者
Vaganian, Lusine [1 ]
Bussmann, Sonja [1 ]
Boecker, Maren [2 ]
Kusch, Michael [3 ]
Labouvie, Hildegard [3 ]
Gerlach, Alexander L. [1 ]
Cwik, Jan C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Fac Human Sci, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Pohligstr 1, D-50969 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp RWTH Aachen, Inst Med Psychol & Med Sociol, Aachen, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Internal Med, Sect Clin Psychooncol Working Grp Psychooncol Hlt, Cologne, Germany
关键词
WHODAS; 2; 0; Disability; Cancer; Rasch analysis; Psychometric properties; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; VERSION; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-021-02872-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The World Health Organization Disability Assessent Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) assesses disability in individuals irrespective of their health condition. Previous studies validated the usefulness of the WHODAS 2.0 using classical test theory. This study is the first investigating the psychometric properties of the 12-items WHODAS 2.0 in patients with cancer using item analysis according to the Rasch model. Methods In total, 350 cancer patients participated in the study. Rasch analysis of the 12-items version of the WHODAS 2.0 was conducted and included testing unidimensionality, local independence, and testing for differential item functioning (DIF) with regard to age, gender, type of cancer, presence of metastases, psycho-oncological support, and duration of disease. Results After accounting for local dependence, which was mainly found across items of the same WHODAS domain, satisfactory overall fit to the Rasch model was established (chi(2) = 36.14, p = 0.07) with good reliability (PSI = 0.82) and unidimensionality of the scale. DIF was found for gender (testlet 'Life activities') and age (testlet 'Getting around/Self-care'), but the size of DIF was not substantial. Conclusion Overall, the analysis results according to the Rasch model support the use of the WHODAS 2.0 12-item version as a measure of disability in cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2929 / 2938
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability and validity of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin–Beck disease
    Mohammad Imran Younus
    Di-Miao Wang
    Fang-fang Yu
    Hua Fang
    Xiong Guo
    Rheumatology International, 2017, 37 : 1567 - 1573
  • [32] Comparison of the 12-item and 36-item versions of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 using longitudinal data from community mental health outreach service users
    Iwanaga, Mai
    Yamaguchi, Sosei
    Sato, Sayaka
    Usui, Kaori
    Nakanishi, Kiyoaki
    Nishiuchi, Erisa
    Shimodaira, Michiyo
    So, Yugan
    Fujii, Chiyo
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 44 (02) : 457 - 463
  • [33] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), Greek Version: A Cross-Sectional Study on Applicants of Welfare Benefits
    Theotokatos, Georgios
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Angelopoulos, Theodore J.
    Chrysagis, Nikolaos K.
    Bickenbach, Jerome
    Venieri, Aikaterini
    Karteroliotis, Konstantinos
    Grammatopoulou, Eirini
    Skordilis, Emmanouil
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [34] Assessment of disability with WHODAS II - 12 Item in trauma patients
    Abedzadeh-kalahroudi, Masoumeh
    Razi, Ebrahim
    Sehat, Mojtaba
    TRAUMA MONTHLY, 2015, 20 : 41 - 41
  • [35] Reliability and validity of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin-Beck disease
    Younus, Mohammad Imran
    Wang, Di-Miao
    Yu, Fang-fang
    Fang, Hua
    Guo, Xiong
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 37 (09) : 1567 - 1573
  • [36] Comparison of the responsiveness of the WOMAC and the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin–Beck disease
    Lei Yang
    Dimiao Wang
    Xiuxia Li
    Hangjing Yuan
    Hua Fang
    Xiong Guo
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21
  • [37] Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Gaskin, Cadeyrn J.
    Lambert, Sylvie D.
    Bowe, Steven J.
    Orellana, Liliana
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [38] Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Cadeyrn J. Gaskin
    Sylvie D. Lambert
    Steven J. Bowe
    Liliana Orellana
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17
  • [39] Correlation between Oswestry disability index and 12-item self-administered version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in patients with chronic low back pain
    Barlund, Esa T.
    Katajapuu, Niina K.
    Paltamaa, Jaana P.
    Saltychev, Mikhail M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2021, 44 (02) : 170 - 172
  • [40] Disability in Italian neurosurgical patients: validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule
    Schiavolin, Silvia
    Ferroli, Paolo
    Acerbi, Francesco
    Brock, Stefano
    Broggi, Morgan
    Cusin, Alberto
    Schiariti, Marco
    Visintini, Sergio
    Quintas, Rui
    Leonardi, Matilde
    Raggi, Alberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2014, 37 (03) : 267 - 270