An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

被引:5
|
作者
Vaganian, Lusine [1 ]
Bussmann, Sonja [1 ]
Boecker, Maren [2 ]
Kusch, Michael [3 ]
Labouvie, Hildegard [3 ]
Gerlach, Alexander L. [1 ]
Cwik, Jan C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Fac Human Sci, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Pohligstr 1, D-50969 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp RWTH Aachen, Inst Med Psychol & Med Sociol, Aachen, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Internal Med, Sect Clin Psychooncol Working Grp Psychooncol Hlt, Cologne, Germany
关键词
WHODAS; 2; 0; Disability; Cancer; Rasch analysis; Psychometric properties; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; VERSION; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-021-02872-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The World Health Organization Disability Assessent Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) assesses disability in individuals irrespective of their health condition. Previous studies validated the usefulness of the WHODAS 2.0 using classical test theory. This study is the first investigating the psychometric properties of the 12-items WHODAS 2.0 in patients with cancer using item analysis according to the Rasch model. Methods In total, 350 cancer patients participated in the study. Rasch analysis of the 12-items version of the WHODAS 2.0 was conducted and included testing unidimensionality, local independence, and testing for differential item functioning (DIF) with regard to age, gender, type of cancer, presence of metastases, psycho-oncological support, and duration of disease. Results After accounting for local dependence, which was mainly found across items of the same WHODAS domain, satisfactory overall fit to the Rasch model was established (chi(2) = 36.14, p = 0.07) with good reliability (PSI = 0.82) and unidimensionality of the scale. DIF was found for gender (testlet 'Life activities') and age (testlet 'Getting around/Self-care'), but the size of DIF was not substantial. Conclusion Overall, the analysis results according to the Rasch model support the use of the WHODAS 2.0 12-item version as a measure of disability in cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2929 / 2938
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
    Lusine Vaganian
    Sonja Bussmann
    Maren Boecker
    Michael Kusch
    Hildegard Labouvie
    Alexander L. Gerlach
    Jan C. Cwik
    Quality of Life Research, 2021, 30 : 2929 - 2938
  • [2] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Carlozzi, Noelle E.
    Kratz, Anna L.
    Downing, Nancy R.
    Goodnight, Siera
    Miner, Jennifer A.
    Migliore, Nicholas
    Paulsen, Jane S.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (08) : 1963 - 1971
  • [3] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Noelle E. Carlozzi
    Anna L. Kratz
    Nancy R. Downing
    Siera Goodnight
    Jennifer A. Miner
    Nicholas Migliore
    Jane S. Paulsen
    Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1963 - 1971
  • [4] Validation of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 12-item tool against the 36-item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and history of severe maternal morbidity
    Silveira, Carla
    Souza, Renato T.
    Costa, Maria L.
    Parpinelli, Mary A.
    Pacagnella, Rodolfo C.
    Ferreira, Elton C.
    Mayrink, Jussara
    Guida, Jose P.
    Sousa, Maria H.
    Say, Lale
    Chou, Doris
    Filippi, Veronique
    Barreix, Maria
    Barbour, Kelli
    Firoz, Tabassum
    von Dadelszen, Peter
    Cecatti, Jose G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 141 : 39 - 47
  • [5] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities
    Papadopoulou, Marianna
    Stasi, Sophia
    Bakalidou, Daphne
    Papageorgiou, Effie
    Tsokani, Aristi
    Bratsi, Theodora
    Papathanasiou, George
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES, 2020, 32 (05) : 801 - 819
  • [6] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities
    Marianna Papadopoulou
    Sophia Stasi
    Daphne Bakalidou
    Effie Papageorgiou
    Aristi Tsokani
    Theodora Bratsi
    George Papathanasiou
    Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 2020, 32 : 801 - 819
  • [7] Normative Data for the 12 Item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Andrews, Gavin
    Kemp, Alice
    Sunderland, Matthew
    Von Korff, Michael
    Ustun, Tevik Bedirhan
    PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (12):
  • [8] Characterization of Disability in Canadians with Mental Disorders Using an Abbreviated Version of a DSM-5 Emerging Measure: The 12-Item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0
    Sjonnesen, Kirsten
    Bulloch, Andrew G. M.
    Williams, Jeanne
    Lavorato, Dina
    Patten, Scott B.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2016, 61 (04): : 227 - 235
  • [9] Psychometric properties and a latent class analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a pooled dataset of community samples
    MacLeod, Melissa A.
    Tremblay, Paul F.
    Graham, Kathryn
    Bernards, Sharon
    Rehm, Jurgen
    Wells, Samantha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (04) : 243 - 254
  • [10] Agreement of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in parents and youth with physical illness living in Canada
    Ferro, Mark A.
    Basque, Dominique
    Elgie, Melissa
    Dol, Megan
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (19) : 3125 - 3134