Radiation Dose from Single-Heartbeat Coronary CT Angiography Performed with a 320-Detector Row Volume Scanner

被引:132
|
作者
Einstein, Andrew J. [1 ,2 ]
Elliston, Carl D. [3 ]
Arai, Andrew E. [4 ]
Chen, Marcus Y. [4 ]
Mather, Richard [5 ]
Pearson, Gregory D. N. [2 ]
DeLaPaz, Robert L. [2 ]
Nickoloff, Edward [2 ]
Dutta, Ajoy [2 ]
Brenner, David J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Radiol Res, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] NHLBI, Cardiac Energet Lab, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Toshiba Amer Med Syst, Tustin, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CARDIAC COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ARTERY-DISEASE; LENGTH PRODUCT; IMAGE QUALITY; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.09090779
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine radiation doses from coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography performed by using a 320-detector row volume scanner and evaluate how the effective dose depends on scan mode and the calculation method used. Materials and Methods: Radiation doses from coronary CT angiography performed by using a volume scanner were determined by using metaloxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor detectors positioned in an anthropomorphic phantom physically and radiographically simulating a male or female human. Organ and effective doses were determined for six scan modes, including both 64-row helical and 280-row volume scans. Effective doses were compared with estimates based on the method most commonly used in clinical literature: multiplying dose-length product (DLP) by a general conversion coefficient (0.017 or 0.014 mSv . mGy(-1) . cm(-1)), determined from Monte Carlo simulations of chest CT by using single-section scanners and previous tissue-weighting factors. Results: Effective dose was reduced by up to 91% with volume scanning relative to helical scanning, with similar image noise. Effective dose, determined by using International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 tissue-weighting factors, was 8.2 mSv, using volume scanning with exposure permitting a wide reconstruction window, 5.8 mSv with optimized exposure and 4.4 mSv for optimized 100-kVp scanning. Estimating effective dose with a chest conversion coefficient resulted in a dose as low as 1.8 mSv, substantially underestimating effective dose for both volume and helical coronary CT angiography. Conclusion: Volume scanning markedly decreases coronary CT angiography radiation doses compared with those at helical scanning. When conversion coefficients are used to estimate effective dose from DLP, they should be appropriate for the scanner and scan mode used and reflect current tissue-weighting factors. (C) RSNA, 2010.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 706
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feasibility of coronary calcium and stent image subtraction using 320-detector row CT angiography
    Fuchs, Andreas
    Kuhl, J. Tobias
    Chen, Marcus Y.
    Helquist, Steffen
    Razeto, Marco
    Arakita, Kazumasa
    Steveson, Chloe
    Arai, Andrew E.
    Kofoed, Klaus F.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2015, 9 (05) : 393 - 398
  • [22] Coronary CT angiography using the second-generation 320-detector row CT: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in various heart rates compared with the first-generation scanner
    Tomizawa, Nobuo
    Maeda, Eriko
    Akahane, Masaaki
    Torigoe, Rumiko
    Kiryu, Shigeru
    Ohtomo, Kuni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 29 (07): : 1613 - 1618
  • [23] Body Size-Adapted Dose of Contrast Material and Scanning Protocol in 320-Detector Row CT Coronary Angiography
    Tatsugami, Fuminari
    Matsuki, Mitsuru
    Nakai, Go
    Inada, Yuki
    Kanazawa, Shuji
    Takeda, Yoshihiro
    Morita, Hideaki
    Takada, Haruhiko
    Yoshikawa, Shushi
    Fukumura, Katsunori
    Narumi, Yoshifumi
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2011, 35 (04) : 475 - 479
  • [24] Coronary CT angiography using the second-generation 320-detector row CT: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in various heart rates compared with the first-generation scanner
    Nobuo Tomizawa
    Eriko Maeda
    Masaaki Akahane
    Rumiko Torigoe
    Shigeru Kiryu
    Kuni Ohtomo
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2013, 29 : 1613 - 1618
  • [25] Quantification of radiation dose reduction by reducing z-axis coverage in 320-detector coronary CT angiography
    Murphy, David J.
    Keraliya, Abhishek
    Himes, Nathan
    Aghayev, Ayaz
    Blankstein, Ron
    Steigner, Michael L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 90 (1076):
  • [26] Accuracy of 320-detector row nonsubtracted and subtracted volume CT angiography in evaluating small cerebral aneurysms
    Chen, Wenhua
    Xing, Wei
    He, Zhongming
    Peng, Ya
    Wang, Caoye
    Wang, Qi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 127 (04) : 725 - 731
  • [27] Image Quality With Single-Heartbeat 320-Multidetector Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography
    Williams, Michelle Claire
    Weir, Nicholas W.
    Mirsadraee, Saeed
    Scott, Anne E.
    Uren, Neal G.
    McKillop, Graham
    van Beek, Edwin J. R.
    Reid, John H.
    Newby, David E.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2014, 38 (03) : 444 - 450
  • [28] Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With 320-Detector Row Computed Tomography
    Nasis, Arthur
    Leung, Michael C.
    Antonis, Paul R.
    Cameron, James D.
    Lehman, Sam J.
    Hope, Sarah A.
    Crossett, Marcus P.
    Troupis, John M.
    Meredith, Ian T.
    Seneviratne, Sujith K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 106 (10): : 1429 - 1435
  • [29] Volume and Shape of Pyriform Sinus: Measurement by Using 320-Detector Row CT
    Okada, Sumiko
    Nakayama, E.
    Inamoto, Y.
    Saitoh, E.
    Kagaya, H.
    Fujii, N.
    Baba, M.
    Ida, Y.
    Kataoka, Y.
    Kanamori, D.
    Katada, K.
    DYSPHAGIA, 2010, 25 (04) : 381 - 381
  • [30] Evaluation of patient dose and operator dose in swallowing CT studies performed with a 320-detector-row multislice CT scanner
    Masanao Kobayashi
    Kichiro Koshida
    Shoichi Suzuki
    Kazuhiro Katada
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2012, 5 (2) : 148 - 155