Radiation Dose from Single-Heartbeat Coronary CT Angiography Performed with a 320-Detector Row Volume Scanner

被引:132
|
作者
Einstein, Andrew J. [1 ,2 ]
Elliston, Carl D. [3 ]
Arai, Andrew E. [4 ]
Chen, Marcus Y. [4 ]
Mather, Richard [5 ]
Pearson, Gregory D. N. [2 ]
DeLaPaz, Robert L. [2 ]
Nickoloff, Edward [2 ]
Dutta, Ajoy [2 ]
Brenner, David J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Radiol Res, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] NHLBI, Cardiac Energet Lab, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Toshiba Amer Med Syst, Tustin, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CARDIAC COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ARTERY-DISEASE; LENGTH PRODUCT; IMAGE QUALITY; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.09090779
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine radiation doses from coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography performed by using a 320-detector row volume scanner and evaluate how the effective dose depends on scan mode and the calculation method used. Materials and Methods: Radiation doses from coronary CT angiography performed by using a volume scanner were determined by using metaloxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor detectors positioned in an anthropomorphic phantom physically and radiographically simulating a male or female human. Organ and effective doses were determined for six scan modes, including both 64-row helical and 280-row volume scans. Effective doses were compared with estimates based on the method most commonly used in clinical literature: multiplying dose-length product (DLP) by a general conversion coefficient (0.017 or 0.014 mSv . mGy(-1) . cm(-1)), determined from Monte Carlo simulations of chest CT by using single-section scanners and previous tissue-weighting factors. Results: Effective dose was reduced by up to 91% with volume scanning relative to helical scanning, with similar image noise. Effective dose, determined by using International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 tissue-weighting factors, was 8.2 mSv, using volume scanning with exposure permitting a wide reconstruction window, 5.8 mSv with optimized exposure and 4.4 mSv for optimized 100-kVp scanning. Estimating effective dose with a chest conversion coefficient resulted in a dose as low as 1.8 mSv, substantially underestimating effective dose for both volume and helical coronary CT angiography. Conclusion: Volume scanning markedly decreases coronary CT angiography radiation doses compared with those at helical scanning. When conversion coefficients are used to estimate effective dose from DLP, they should be appropriate for the scanner and scan mode used and reflect current tissue-weighting factors. (C) RSNA, 2010.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 706
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiation Dose From Single Heartbeat Coronary CT Angiography Performed Using a 320 Detector-Row Volume Scanner
    Einstein, Andrew J.
    Elliston, Carl D.
    Arai, Andrew E.
    Chen, Marcus Y.
    Mather, Richard
    Pearson, Gregory D.
    DeLapaz, Robert L.
    Nickoloff, Edward L.
    Dutta, Ajoy
    Brenner, David J.
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (18) : S311 - S311
  • [2] Patient radiation dose in prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography and retrospectively gated helical technique with a 320-detector row CT scanner
    Seguchi, Shigenobu
    Aoyama, Takahiko
    Koyama, Shuji
    Fujii, Keisuke
    Yamauchi-Kawaura, Chiyo
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (11) : 5579 - 5585
  • [3] 320-detector CT coronary angiography with prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram gating in a single heartbeat: comparison of image quality and radiation dose
    Qin, J.
    Liu, L-Y
    Fang, Y.
    Zhu, J-M
    Wu, Z.
    Zhu, K-S
    Zhang, J-S
    Shan, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1015): : 945 - 951
  • [4] Submillisievert Median Radiation Dose for Coronary Angiography with a Second-Generation 320-Detector Row CT Scanner in 107 Consecutive Patients
    Chen, Marcus Y.
    Shanbhag, Sujata M.
    Arai, Andrew E.
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (01) : 76 - 85
  • [5] Radiation dose in coronary artery angiography with 320-detector row CT and its diagnostic accuracy: comparison with 64-detector row CT
    Zhang, T.
    Luo, Z. -R.
    Wang, D.
    Han, D.
    Bai, J-Q
    Meng, X. -W.
    Shen, B. -Z.
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2011, 102 (04) : 249 - 259
  • [6] Subtraction Coronary CT Angiography for the Evaluation of Severely Calcified Lesions Using a 320-Detector Row Scanner
    Yoshioka K.
    Tanaka R.
    Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, 2011, 4 (6) : 437 - 446
  • [7] Comparison of the accuracy of subtraction CT angiography performed on 320-detector row volume CT with conventional CT angiography for diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms
    Luo, Zhuren
    Wang, Dan
    Sun, Xilin
    Zhang, Tong
    Liu, Fang
    Dong, Dandan
    Chan, Nicholas K.
    Shen, Baozhong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (01) : 118 - 122
  • [8] Diagnostic Performance Of 320-Detector Row CT Coronary Angiography: a Comparison with Invasive Angiography
    Nasis, Arthur
    Leung, Michael C.
    Antonis, Paul R.
    Cameron, James D.
    Meredith, Ian T.
    Moir, William S.
    Hope, Sarah A.
    Troupis, John M.
    Crossett, Marcus P.
    Seneviratne, Sujith K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 104 (6A): : 68D - 68D
  • [9] Radiation Dose of Second-Generation 320-Detector Row CT
    Qian, Xue-jiang
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 268 (03) : 927 - 928
  • [10] CT coronary angiography: 256-slice and 320-detector row scanners
    Hsiao E.M.
    Rybicki F.J.
    Steigner M.
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2010, 12 (1) : 68 - 75