Screening for myopia and refractive errors using LogMAR visual acuity by optometrists and a simplified visual acuity chart by nurses

被引:18
|
作者
Tong, L
Saw, SM
Chan, ESY
Yap, M
Lee, HY
Kwang, YP
Tan, D
机构
[1] Singapore Natl Eye Ctr, Singapore 168751, Singapore
[2] Singapore Eye Res Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[4] Minist Hlth Singapore, Natl Med Res Council, Clin Trials & Epidemiol Res, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Minist Hlth Singapore, Hlth Promot Board, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
epidemiology; human; clinical study; cross-sectional study; refractive errors; myopia; visual acuity;
D O I
10.1097/01.opx.0000144747.88341.b2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To compare the sensitivity and specificity of a widespread method of screening for refractive errors in Singapore schoolchildren using a simplified acuity screening chart with a more rigorous method using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. A secondary aim is to estimate the best cutoff values for the detection of refractive errors using these two methods. Methods. This is a population-based study, involving 1779 schoolchildren from three schools in Singapore. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity was recorded using a modified Bailey-Lovie chart by trained optometrists, and visual acuity measurement was also undertaken using a simplified 7-line visual acuity screening chart by school health nurses. The main outcome measures were the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC's) of logMAR and the simplified screening visual acuity to detect myopia or any refractive errors. The difference between measurements, simplified screening visual acuity - logMAR visual acuity, was calculated. Results. The optimal threshold using the simplified screening visual acuity chart for the detection of myopia or any refractive error was 6/12 or worse. Using logMAR visual acuity, the most efficient threshold for the detection of myopia was 0.26, but this was 0.18 for the detection of any refractive error. The area under the ROC curves was significantly greater in the case of the logMAR visual acuity measurement compared with the simplified screening visual acuity measurement for the detection of myopia or any refractive errors. The 95% limits of agreement for the two methods (simplified screening - logMAR acuity) was -0.219 to +0.339. Conclusions. Bearing in mind that the visual acuity measurements were performed by two different groups of professionals, visual acuity screening using the ETDRS method appears to be more accurate than the simplified charts for the detection of myopia or any refractive errors in children.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 691
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] VISUAL-ACUITY AND ABERRATIONS IN MYOPIA
    APPLEGATE, RA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1991, 32 (04) : 1211 - 1211
  • [42] The Snellen Chart as a test of visual acuity
    Hetherington, Ralph
    PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1954, 24 (04): : 349 - 357
  • [43] VISUAL-ACUITY AND CHART LUMINANCE
    SHEEDY, JE
    BAILEY, IL
    RAASCH, TW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1984, 61 (09): : 595 - 600
  • [44] Treatment of myopia through operant training in visual acuity: changes in visual discrimination and refractive error
    Gismera-Neuberger, S
    Santacreu, J
    PSICOLOGIA CONDUCTUAL, 1997, 5 (03): : 409 - 432
  • [45] Is conversion of decimal visual acuity measurements to logMAR values reliable?
    Asimina Mataftsi
    Dimitrios Koutsimpogeorgos
    Periklis Brazitikos
    Nikolaos Ziakas
    Anna-Bettina Haidich
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2019, 257 : 1513 - 1517
  • [46] Use of Visual Acuity to Screen for Significant Refractive Errors in Adolescents Is It Reliable?
    Leone, Jody Fay
    Mitchell, Paul
    Morgan, Ian George
    Kifley, Annette
    Rose, Kathryn Ailsa
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 128 (07) : 894 - 899
  • [47] Static and dynamic visual acuity and refractive errors in elite football players
    Jorge, Jorge
    Fernandes, Paulo
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2019, 102 (01) : 51 - 56
  • [48] Impact of Ramadan fasting on intraocular pressure, visual acuity and refractive errors
    Assadi, M.
    Akrami, A.
    Beikzadeh, F.
    Seyedabadi, M.
    Nabipour, I
    Larijani, B.
    Afarid, M.
    Seidali, E.
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 52 (04) : 263 - 266
  • [49] VISUAL-ACUITY AND REFRACTIVE ERRORS IN THE ELDERLY IN NURSING-HOMES
    RIFAAT, R
    KIVELA, SL
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE, 1989, 22 (06): : 315 - 320
  • [50] Visual acuities as measured with an automatic intelligent visual acuity chart projector and standard logarithmic visual acuity chart: a prospective comparative study
    Luo, Mingyue
    Liu, Xinyu
    Zhang, Dingding
    Chen, Youxin
    Kang, Weijuan
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2025, 12