Screening for myopia and refractive errors using LogMAR visual acuity by optometrists and a simplified visual acuity chart by nurses

被引:18
|
作者
Tong, L
Saw, SM
Chan, ESY
Yap, M
Lee, HY
Kwang, YP
Tan, D
机构
[1] Singapore Natl Eye Ctr, Singapore 168751, Singapore
[2] Singapore Eye Res Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[4] Minist Hlth Singapore, Natl Med Res Council, Clin Trials & Epidemiol Res, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Minist Hlth Singapore, Hlth Promot Board, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
epidemiology; human; clinical study; cross-sectional study; refractive errors; myopia; visual acuity;
D O I
10.1097/01.opx.0000144747.88341.b2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To compare the sensitivity and specificity of a widespread method of screening for refractive errors in Singapore schoolchildren using a simplified acuity screening chart with a more rigorous method using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. A secondary aim is to estimate the best cutoff values for the detection of refractive errors using these two methods. Methods. This is a population-based study, involving 1779 schoolchildren from three schools in Singapore. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity was recorded using a modified Bailey-Lovie chart by trained optometrists, and visual acuity measurement was also undertaken using a simplified 7-line visual acuity screening chart by school health nurses. The main outcome measures were the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC's) of logMAR and the simplified screening visual acuity to detect myopia or any refractive errors. The difference between measurements, simplified screening visual acuity - logMAR visual acuity, was calculated. Results. The optimal threshold using the simplified screening visual acuity chart for the detection of myopia or any refractive error was 6/12 or worse. Using logMAR visual acuity, the most efficient threshold for the detection of myopia was 0.26, but this was 0.18 for the detection of any refractive error. The area under the ROC curves was significantly greater in the case of the logMAR visual acuity measurement compared with the simplified screening visual acuity measurement for the detection of myopia or any refractive errors. The 95% limits of agreement for the two methods (simplified screening - logMAR acuity) was -0.219 to +0.339. Conclusions. Bearing in mind that the visual acuity measurements were performed by two different groups of professionals, visual acuity screening using the ETDRS method appears to be more accurate than the simplified charts for the detection of myopia or any refractive errors in children.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 691
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RELATION OF VISUAL ACUITY TO MYOPIA
    HIRSCH, MJ
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1945, 34 (05) : 418 - 421
  • [32] Measuring the impact of suppression on visual acuity in children with amblyopia using a dichoptic visual acuity chart
    Zhu, Bixia
    Liao, Meng
    Liu, Longqian
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [33] Saving space: Comparing mini - logMAR with standard logMAR visual acuity
    Kauser, Farnaz
    Amitava, Abadan K.
    Saxena, Juhi
    Raza, S. Aisha
    Masood, Anam
    Alam, Md. Shahid
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 69 (01) : 48 - +
  • [34] A comparison of visual acuity measured by ETDRS chart and Standard Logarithmic Visual Acuity chart among outpatients
    Wang, Tao
    Huang, Pei-Jie
    Chen, Chen
    Liu, Ding-Wei
    Yi, Jing-Lin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 14 (04) : 536 - 540
  • [35] A comparison of visual acuity measured by ETDRS chart and Standard Logarithmic Visual Acuity chart among outpatients
    Tao Wang
    Pei-Jie Huang
    Chen Chen
    Ding-Wei Liu
    Jing-Lin Yi
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2021, 14 (04) : 536 - 540
  • [36] Improvement of visual acuity following refractive surgery for myopia and myopic anisometropia
    Vuori, Elisa
    Tervo, Timo M. T.
    Holopainen, Martti V. A.
    Holopainen, Juha M.
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 23 (05) : 447 - 455
  • [37] The dependency of LogMAR visual acuity measurements on chart design and scoring rule - Author's response
    Hazel, CA
    Elliott, DB
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2003, 80 (07) : 487 - 487
  • [38] Comparison of logMAR ETDRS chart and a new computerised staircased procedure for assessment of the visual acuity of children
    Stewart, Catherine E.
    Hussey, Alex
    Davies, Nigel
    Moseley, Merrick J.
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2006, 26 (06) : 597 - 601
  • [39] THE TRAINING OF VISUAL-ACUITY IN MYOPIA
    BALLIET, R
    CLAY, A
    BLOOD, K
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION, 1982, 53 (09) : 719 - 724
  • [40] MAGNIFICATION AND VISUAL-ACUITY IN MYOPIA
    STRANG, NC
    WINN, B
    APPLEGATE, RA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1994, 35 (04) : 1805 - 1805