Objective value on Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map to categorize the intensity of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) restriction for prostate cancer detection on multiparametric prostate MRI

被引:0
|
作者
Mussi, Thais Caldara [1 ]
Martins, Tatiana [1 ,2 ]
Tachibana, Adriano [1 ]
Mousessian, Pedro Nogueira [1 ]
Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Albert Einstein 627, BR-05652900 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Ecoar Med Diagnost, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2018年 / 44卷 / 05期
关键词
Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostatic Neoplasms; Prostate; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; DATA SYSTEM; BIOPSY; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0038
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To identify objective and subjective criteria on multiparametric prostate MRI that can be helpful for prostate cancer detection. Materials and Methods: Retrospective study, IRB approved, including 122 patients who had suspicious lesion on MRI and who underwent prostate biopsy with ultrasonography (US)/MRI imaging fusion. There were 60 patients with positive biopsies and 62 with negative biopsies. MRI of these patients were randomized and evaluated independently by two blinded radiologists. The following variables were analyzed in each lesion: morphology, contours, T2 signal, diffusion restriction (subjective impression and objective values), hyper-enhancement, contact with transition zone or prostatic contour, prostatic contour retraction, Likert and PIRADS classification. Results: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was the best predictor of positivity for prostate cancer, with mean value of 1.08 (SD 0.20) and 1.09 mm2/sec (SD 0.24) on negative biopsies and 0.81 (SD 0.22) and 0.84 mm2/sec (SD 0.22) on positive biopsies for readers 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.001 in both analysis). For the others categorical variables evaluated the best AUC for reader 1 was subjective intensity of diffusion restriction (AUC of 0.74) and for reader 2 was hyper-enhancement (AUC of 0.65), all inferior comparing to the value of ADC map. Interobserver agreement ranged from 0.13 to 0.75, poor in most measurements, and good or excellent (kappa > 0.6) only in lesion size and ADC values. Conclusions: Diffusion restriction with lower ADC-values is the best parameter to predict cancer on MRI prior to biopsy. Efforts to establish an ADC cutoff value would improve cancer detection, especially for less experience reader.
引用
收藏
页码:882 / 891
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient factor (ADC) calculation in differentiation of solid breast lesions
    Osman, Ahmed M.
    Shebrya, Naglaa H.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 47 (01): : 363 - 371
  • [32] The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors
    Park, Mi Jung
    Cha, Eun Suk
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Ihn, Yon Kwon
    Baik, Jun Hyun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 8 (05) : 390 - 396
  • [33] Differentiation of prostate cancer and prostatitis in the peripheral zone with diffusion-weighted imaging: ADC value versus normalized ADC value
    Yang, Dong
    Jin, Nan
    Guo, Yan
    Wang, Huan-Jun
    Pan, Bi-Tao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (02): : 5127 - 5134
  • [34] Short Term Reproducibility in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Diffusion Weighted MRI of the Prostate
    Sadinski, M.
    Medved, M.
    Karademir, I.
    Wang, S.
    Peng, Y.
    Jiang, Y.
    Sammet, S.
    Karczmar, G.
    Oto, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [35] Comparison Between Gleason Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Obtained from Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer Patients
    Caivano, Rocchina
    Rabasco, Paola
    Lotumolo, Antonella
    Cirillo, Patrizia
    D'Antuono, Felice
    Zandolino, Alexis
    Villonio, Antonio
    Macarini, Luca
    Salvatore, Marco
    Cammarota, Aldo
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2013, 31 (09) : 625 - 629
  • [36] Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in prostate diseases characterization on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Salvaggio, Giuseppe
    Calamia, Mauro
    Purpura, Pierpaolo
    Bartolotta, Tommaso V.
    Picone, Dario
    Dispensa, Nino
    Lunetta, Claudio
    Bruno, Alberto
    Raso, Ludovica
    Salvaggio, Leonardo
    Lo Re, Giuseppe
    Galia, Massimo
    Simonato, Alchiede
    Midiri, Massimo
    Lagalla, Roberto
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (02) : 154 - 160
  • [37] THE APPLICATION OF MINIMAL SCORE OF APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT (ADC) IN PROSTATE MRI TO PREDICT THE PROSTATE CANCER MICROENVIRONMENT
    Kato, Manabu
    Veronica, Placencio
    Ishii, Kenichiro
    Nishikawa, Kohei
    Arima, Kiminobu
    Hirokawa, Yoshihumi
    Watanabe, Masatoshi
    Sugimura, Yoshiki
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E851 - E852
  • [38] Evaluation of the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detection
    Morgan, V. A.
    Kyriazi, S.
    Ashley, S. E.
    DeSouza, N. M.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2007, 48 (06) : 695 - 703
  • [39] Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for detection of malignanat vertebral bone marrow lesions
    Filograna, L.
    Magarelli, N.
    Cellini, F.
    Manfrida, S.
    Leone, A.
    Colosimo, C.
    Valentini, V.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (03) : 590 - 597
  • [40] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Breast Cancer: Correlation of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value with Prognostic Factors
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Cha, Eun Suk
    Kim, Hyeon Sook
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Choi, Jae Jeong
    Jung, Ji Han
    Park, Yong Gyu
    Suh, Young Jin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (03) : 615 - 620