Objective value on Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map to categorize the intensity of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) restriction for prostate cancer detection on multiparametric prostate MRI

被引:0
|
作者
Mussi, Thais Caldara [1 ]
Martins, Tatiana [1 ,2 ]
Tachibana, Adriano [1 ]
Mousessian, Pedro Nogueira [1 ]
Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Albert Einstein 627, BR-05652900 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Ecoar Med Diagnost, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2018年 / 44卷 / 05期
关键词
Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostatic Neoplasms; Prostate; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; DATA SYSTEM; BIOPSY; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0038
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To identify objective and subjective criteria on multiparametric prostate MRI that can be helpful for prostate cancer detection. Materials and Methods: Retrospective study, IRB approved, including 122 patients who had suspicious lesion on MRI and who underwent prostate biopsy with ultrasonography (US)/MRI imaging fusion. There were 60 patients with positive biopsies and 62 with negative biopsies. MRI of these patients were randomized and evaluated independently by two blinded radiologists. The following variables were analyzed in each lesion: morphology, contours, T2 signal, diffusion restriction (subjective impression and objective values), hyper-enhancement, contact with transition zone or prostatic contour, prostatic contour retraction, Likert and PIRADS classification. Results: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was the best predictor of positivity for prostate cancer, with mean value of 1.08 (SD 0.20) and 1.09 mm2/sec (SD 0.24) on negative biopsies and 0.81 (SD 0.22) and 0.84 mm2/sec (SD 0.22) on positive biopsies for readers 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.001 in both analysis). For the others categorical variables evaluated the best AUC for reader 1 was subjective intensity of diffusion restriction (AUC of 0.74) and for reader 2 was hyper-enhancement (AUC of 0.65), all inferior comparing to the value of ADC map. Interobserver agreement ranged from 0.13 to 0.75, poor in most measurements, and good or excellent (kappa > 0.6) only in lesion size and ADC values. Conclusions: Diffusion restriction with lower ADC-values is the best parameter to predict cancer on MRI prior to biopsy. Efforts to establish an ADC cutoff value would improve cancer detection, especially for less experience reader.
引用
收藏
页码:882 / 891
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Objective Value of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Map from Ultrahigh b-value Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI) in 3T MRI could be a Non-invasive Specific Biomarker for Prostate Cancer
    Zhang, Kun
    Zhang, Chen
    Chen, Zhengming
    Zhang, Yun
    Dong, Zhe
    Hu, Yingying
    Wang, Meifeng
    Fu, Yonggui
    Ye, Huiyi
    Shen, Yanguang
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 20
  • [2] Synthetic Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for High b-Value Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Prostate
    Sahoo, Prativa
    Rockne, Russell C.
    Jung, Alexander
    Gupta, Pradeep K.
    Rathore, Ram K. S.
    Gupta, Rakesh K.
    PROSTATE CANCER, 2020, 2020
  • [3] The value of diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection and localization
    Yagci, Ahmet Baki
    Ozari, Nurgul
    Aybek, Zafer
    Duzcan, Ender
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 17 (02) : 130 - 134
  • [4] Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted MR imaging and Gleason score in prostate cancer
    Wu, X.
    Reinikainen, P.
    Vanhanen, A.
    Kapanen, M.
    Vierikko, T.
    Ryymin, P.
    Hyodynmaa, S.
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P. -L.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2017, 98 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [5] Multiparametric MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Accuracy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Pepe, Pietro
    D'Urso, Davide
    Garufi, Antonio
    Priolo, Giandomenico
    Pennisi, Michele
    Russo, Giorgio
    Sabini, Maria Gabriella
    Valastro, Lucia Maria
    Galia, Antonio
    Fraggetta, Filippo
    IN VIVO, 2017, 31 (03): : 415 - 418
  • [6] The Utility of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values in Discriminating Between Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissue
    Luczynska, Elzbieta
    Heinze-Paluchowska, Sylwia
    Domalik, Agnieszka
    Cwierz, Anna
    Kasperkiewicz, Hanna
    Blecharz, Pawel
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 79 : 450 - 455
  • [7] Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of optic nerve head in Papilledema
    Maaly, Mohamed Abdel-Aziz
    Hafez, Kamal Y. M. K.
    Habib, Rehab Mohammed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 53 (01):
  • [8] Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of optic nerve head in Papilledema
    Mohamed Abdel-Aziz Maaly
    Kamal Y. M. K. Hafez
    Rehab Mohammed Habib
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 53
  • [9] Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Tumor Visibility on Trace Diffusion-Weighted Images and the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Kong, Xiangtian
    Niver, Benjamin E.
    Berkman, Douglas S.
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Babb, James S.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (01) : 123 - 129
  • [10] Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in determining response to treatment in lung cancer
    Bulut, Eser
    Kosucu, Polat
    Ozlu, Tevfik
    Kosucu, Muge
    Kavgaci, Halil
    Cakir, Ismet Mirac
    Bulut, Arzu Coskuner
    CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 48 (01): : 187 - 193