Analysis of skeletal movements in mandibular distraction osteogenesis

被引:33
|
作者
Yeshwant, K
Seldin, EB
Gateno, T
Everett, P
White, CL
Kikinis, R
Kaban, LB
Troulis, AJ
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Surg Planning Lab, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
OSTEOTOMY; DEVICE; SYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2004.06.057
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to use geometric parameters of movement, calculated from 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) data, to determine the curvilinear distractor dimensions required to correct mandibular deformities in a series of patients. Materials and Methods: Preoperative CT scans from 15 patients with symmetric (n = 5) and asymmetric (n = 10) deformities were imported into a CT-based software program (Osteoplan; an open-source visualization application developed by Gering et al at the Surgical Planning Laboratory [SPL, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA]). The software was used to reconstruct virtual 3-dimensional models from these scans. Two experienced surgeons, working with a computer scientist, then used Osteoplan to create an ideal treatment plan for each patient. In each case, the 3-dimensional curvilinear movement was quantified using 4 "parameters of movement" (POMs). These parameters were then used to prescribe a distraction device capable of executing the planned skeletal correction. Curvilinear distractor dimensions calculated by Osteoplan included the radius of curvature of the prescribed device, and the distractor elongation, pitch, and handedness. Results: Treatment plans including POMs were developed for each patient. The radii of curvature for the prescribed distractors ranged from 2.3 to 14.1 cm, the distractor elongation dimensions ranged from 0.7 to 3.2 cm, and the pitch (horizontal plane) dimensions ranged from 0.005 to 0.8 cm. Handedness was either a left (n = 12) or right (n = 8) turning helix. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that, using geometric parameters of movement calculated from 3-dimensional CT scans, curvilinear devices could be prescribed for correction of the range of skeletal deformities in this group of patients. (C) 2005 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 340
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of skeletal and soft-tissue changes following unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Altug-Atac, Ayse T.
    Grayson, Barry H.
    McCarthy, Joseph G.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 121 (05) : 1751 - 1759
  • [42] Obstructive Sleep Apnea Successfully Treated by Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in a Rare Skeletal Dysplasia
    Griffiths, Amanda Louise
    Heggie, Andrew
    Holman, Sarah
    Robertson, Stephen P.
    White, Susan M.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (02) : 508 - 510
  • [43] Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a comparison of distraction rates in the rabbit model
    Stewart, KJ
    Lvoff, GO
    White, SA
    Bonar, SF
    Walsh, WR
    Smart, RC
    Poole, MD
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 26 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [44] Denervation During Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Results in Impaired Osteogenesis
    Tevlin, Ruth
    Januszyk, Michael
    Griffin, Michelle
    Salhotra, Ankit
    Wan, Derrick C.
    Chan, Charles K. F.
    Longaker, Michael T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 233 (05) : S196 - S197
  • [45] Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects by distraction osteogenesis for mandibular reconstruction
    Kuriakose, MA
    Shnayder, Y
    DeLacure, MD
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2003, 25 (10): : 816 - 824
  • [46] Biomechanical Analysis of the Effect of Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Aykan, Andac
    Ozturk, Serdar
    Sahin, Ismail
    Gurses, Senih
    Ural, Ali Ugur
    Oren, Nisa Cem
    Isik, Selcuk
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (02) : E169 - E175
  • [47] Analysis of the performance of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis
    Boccaccio, A.
    Cozzani, M.
    Pappalettere, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 33 (02) : 113 - 120
  • [48] DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF MANDIBULAR SYMPHYSEAL DEFECTS
    ANNINO, DJ
    GOGUEN, LA
    KARMODY, CS
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1994, 120 (09) : 911 - 916
  • [49] Pediatric mandibular distraction osteogenesis: The present and the future
    Rhee, ST
    Buchman, SR
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 14 (05) : 803 - 808
  • [50] Endoscopically assisted intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Hierl, T
    Hemprich, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 30 (04) : 339 - 341