Analysis of skeletal movements in mandibular distraction osteogenesis

被引:33
|
作者
Yeshwant, K
Seldin, EB
Gateno, T
Everett, P
White, CL
Kikinis, R
Kaban, LB
Troulis, AJ
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Surg Planning Lab, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
OSTEOTOMY; DEVICE; SYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2004.06.057
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to use geometric parameters of movement, calculated from 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) data, to determine the curvilinear distractor dimensions required to correct mandibular deformities in a series of patients. Materials and Methods: Preoperative CT scans from 15 patients with symmetric (n = 5) and asymmetric (n = 10) deformities were imported into a CT-based software program (Osteoplan; an open-source visualization application developed by Gering et al at the Surgical Planning Laboratory [SPL, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA]). The software was used to reconstruct virtual 3-dimensional models from these scans. Two experienced surgeons, working with a computer scientist, then used Osteoplan to create an ideal treatment plan for each patient. In each case, the 3-dimensional curvilinear movement was quantified using 4 "parameters of movement" (POMs). These parameters were then used to prescribe a distraction device capable of executing the planned skeletal correction. Curvilinear distractor dimensions calculated by Osteoplan included the radius of curvature of the prescribed device, and the distractor elongation, pitch, and handedness. Results: Treatment plans including POMs were developed for each patient. The radii of curvature for the prescribed distractors ranged from 2.3 to 14.1 cm, the distractor elongation dimensions ranged from 0.7 to 3.2 cm, and the pitch (horizontal plane) dimensions ranged from 0.005 to 0.8 cm. Handedness was either a left (n = 12) or right (n = 8) turning helix. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that, using geometric parameters of movement calculated from 3-dimensional CT scans, curvilinear devices could be prescribed for correction of the range of skeletal deformities in this group of patients. (C) 2005 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 340
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A mouse model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Fang, TD
    Nacamuli, RP
    Song, HM
    Thomas, R
    Fong, KD
    Aalami, OO
    Longaker, MT
    CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 10, 2003, : 397 - 398
  • [32] Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the pediatric patient
    Tibesar, Robert J.
    Sidman, James D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2008, 16 (06): : 548 - 554
  • [33] Mandibular overgrowth after distraction osteogenesis
    Rahman, M. M.
    Stewart, D. A.
    Gianoutsos, M. P.
    CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY: PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, : 335 - 337
  • [34] Mandibular widening by intraoral distraction osteogenesis
    Guerrero, CA
    Bell, WH
    Contasti, GI
    Rodriguez, AM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 35 (06): : 383 - 392
  • [35] The Influence of Expansion Rates on Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: A Computational Analysis
    A. Boccaccio
    C. Pappalettere
    D. J. Kelly
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2007, 35 : 1940 - 1960
  • [36] Fractal analysis of regeneration in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rats.
    Connors, N. A.
    Liu, Z. J.
    Bollen, A. -M.
    King, G. J.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B164 - B164
  • [37] The influence of expansion rates on mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A computational analysis
    Boccaccio, A.
    Pappalettere, C.
    Kelly, D. J.
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 35 (11) : 1940 - 1960
  • [38] Stress Distribution on the Mandibular Condyle and the Distraction Area in Distraction Osteogenesis by Finite Element Analysis
    Li, Peng
    Long, Jie
    Tang, Wei
    Li, Jia
    Liang, Rui
    Tian, Dong Wei
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (03) : 1031 - 1037
  • [39] Validation of a musculo-skeletal model of the mandible and its application to mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    de Zee, Mark
    Dalstra, Michel
    Cattaneo, Paolo M.
    Rasmussen, John
    Svensson, Peter
    Melsen, Birte
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2007, 40 (06) : 1192 - 1201
  • [40] Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis with stepwise osteotomy in adult skeletal class III patient
    Tae, K. C.
    Kang, K. W.
    Kim, S. C.
    Min, S. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 35 (06) : 556 - 558