Risk aversion, fanning preference and volatility smirk on S&P 500 index options

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Jian [1 ]
Ma, Chenghu [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Econ, Dept Finance, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Finance Res Ctr, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Recursive utility; fanning effect; jump risk; option smirk; INTERTEMPORAL RECURSIVE UTILITY; ASSET PRICING MODEL; MARKET; SUBSTITUTION; CONSUMPTION; UNCERTAINTY; BEHAVIOR; PREMIA; PRICES; HABIT;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2015.1137548
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article proposes a novel way of pricing S&P 500 index options in the presence of jump risk. Our analysis is built upon an equilibrium option pricing rule for a representative agent economy. In particular, we use the weighted utility's certainty equivalent to specify agent's risk preference, which displays a fanning-out characteristic. We find that the fanning effect captures a remarkably large portion of the total market risk premium implicit in options. As a result, the model with fanning effect generates pronounced volatility smirks.
引用
收藏
页码:3277 / 3292
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Supply and Demand of S&P 500 Put Options
    Constantinides, George M.
    Lian, Lei
    CRITICAL FINANCE REVIEW, 2021, 10 (01): : 1 - 20
  • [32] Inferring volatility dynamics and risk premia from the S&P 500 and VIX markets
    Bardgett, Chris
    Gourier, Elise
    Leippold, Markus
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 131 (03) : 593 - 618
  • [33] Comparison between volatility return intervals of the S&P 500 index and two common models
    I. Vodenska-Chitkushev
    F. Z. Wang
    P. Weber
    K. Yamasaki
    S. Havlin
    H. E. Stanley
    The European Physical Journal B, 2008, 61 : 217 - 223
  • [34] How important is the correlation between returns and volatility in a stochastic volatility model? Empirical evidence from pricing and hedging in the S&P 500 index options market
    Nandi, S
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1998, 22 (05) : 589 - 610
  • [35] Comparison between volatility return intervals of the S&P 500 index and two common models
    Vodenska-Chitkushev, I.
    Wang, F. Z.
    Weber, P.
    Yamasaki, K.
    Havlin, S.
    Stanley, H. E.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2008, 61 (02): : 217 - 223
  • [36] Are combination forecasts of S&P 500 volatility statistically superior?
    Becker, Ralf
    Clements, Adam E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2008, 24 (01) : 122 - 133
  • [38] The smirk in the S&P500 futures options prices: a linearized factor analysis
    Carverhill, Andrew
    Cheuk, Terry H. F.
    Dyrting, Sigurd
    REVIEW OF DERIVATIVES RESEARCH, 2009, 12 (02) : 109 - 139
  • [39] On the information content of implied liquidity measure: Evidence from the S&P 500 index options
    Yerli, Cigdem
    Eksi-Altay, Zehra
    Selcuk-Kestel, A. Sevtap
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 57
  • [40] Optimization-based tail risk hedging of the S&P 500 index
    He, Yuehuan
    Kwon, Roy
    ENGINEERING ECONOMIST, 2023, 68 (03): : 153 - 168