Inductive time-space lower bounds for SAT and related problems

被引:11
|
作者
Williams, Ryan [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
time-space tradeoffs; lower bounds; polynomial-time hierarchy; satisfiability; diagonalization; bounded nondeterminism;
D O I
10.1007/s00037-007-0221-1
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We improve upon indirect diagonalization arguments for lower bounds on explicit problems within the polynomial hierarchy. Our contributions are summarized as follows. 1. We present a technique that uniformly improves upon most known nonlinear time lower bounds for nondeterminism and alternating computation, on both subpolynomial (n(o(1))) space RAMs and sequential one-tape machines with random access to the input. We obtain improved lower bounds for Boolean satisfiability (SAT), as well as all NP-complete problems that have efficient reductions from SAT, and Sigma(k)-SAT, for constant k >= 2. For example, SAT cannot be solved by random access machines using n(root 3) time and subpolynomial space. 2. We show how indirect diagonalization leads to time-space lower bounds for computation with bounded nondeterminism. For both the random access and multitape Turing machine models, we prove that for all k >= 1, there is a constant c(k) > 1 such that linear time with n(1/k) nondeterministic bits is not contained in deterministic n(ck) time with subpolynomial space. This is used to prove that satisfiability of Boolean circuits with n inputs and n(k) size cannot be solved by deterministic multitape Turing machines running in n(k.ck) time and subpolynomial space.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 470
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inductive Time-Space Lower Bounds for Sat and Related Problems
    Ryan Williams
    computational complexity, 2006, 15 : 433 - 470
  • [2] Better time-space lower bounds for SAT and related problems
    Williams, R
    TWENTIETH ANNUAL IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 40 - 49
  • [3] Time-space lower bounds for SAT on uniform and non-uniform machines
    Tourlakis, I
    15TH ANNUAL IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 22 - 33
  • [4] Time-space lower bounds for satistiability
    Fortnow, L
    Lipton, R
    van Melkebeek, D
    Viglas, A
    JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 2005, 52 (06) : 835 - 865
  • [5] Time-space trade-off lower bounds for randomized computation of decision problems
    Beame, P
    Saks, M
    Sun, XD
    Vee, E
    JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 2003, 50 (02) : 154 - 195
  • [6] Time-Space Tradeoffs in Resolution: Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Superlinear Space
    Beame, Paul
    Beck, Chris
    Impagliazzo, Russell
    STOC'12: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, 2012, : 213 - 231
  • [7] Extractor-Based Time-Space Lower Bounds for Learning
    Garg, Sumegha
    Raz, Ran
    Tal, Avishay
    STOC'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 50TH ANNUAL ACM SIGACT SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, 2018, : 990 - 1002
  • [8] Time-Space Lower Bounds for Two-Pass Learning
    Garg, Sumegha
    Raz, Ran
    Tal, Avishay
    34TH COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY CONFERENCE (CCC 2019), 2019, 137
  • [9] LIMITS ON ALTERNATION TRADING PROOFS FOR TIME-SPACE LOWER BOUNDS
    Buss, Samuel R.
    Williams, Ryan
    COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, 2015, 24 (03) : 533 - 600
  • [10] Comparison-Based Time-Space Lower Bounds for Selection
    Chan, Timothy M.
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON ALGORITHMS, 2010, 6 (02)