Wavefront termination with monophasic and biphasic shocks: A simulation study

被引:0
|
作者
Trayanova, N [1 ]
Bray, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This modeling study examines the effect of monophasic, and biphasic waveforms on the response of cardiac fiber to a defibrillation shock. Shocks of various strengths and coupling intervals (CIs) are delivered extracellularly during the relative refractory period. The results show that monophasic shock strengths of three times the diastolic threshold (DT) either elicit no response, or, for coupling intervals above 380ms, reinitiate propagation. In contrast, biphasic shocks of same strength are capable of terminating the existing wavefronts by invoking either a graded response (CIs 370 to 382ms) that prolongs the refractory period, or by inducing a propagation block (CIs above 400ms) that renders the fiber absolutely refractory. Biphasic shocks have only a small "vulnerable" window of coupling intervals over which propagation is reinitiated. Thus, the results obtained in this study offer a possible explanation of the mechanisms underlying the increased efficacy of biphasic defibrillation waveforms.
引用
收藏
页码:1289 / 1290
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARISON OF MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC SHOCKS IN CARDIOVERSION OF VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA IN THE CANINE INFARCT MODEL
    CALLIHAN, RL
    WALCOTT, GP
    SMITH, WM
    IDEKER, RE
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1994, : A208 - A208
  • [32] COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC TRUNCATED EXPONENTIAL SHOCKS FOR NONTHORACOTOMY INTERNAL DEFIBRILLATION IN DOGS
    CHAPMAN, PD
    VETTER, JW
    SOUZA, JJ
    TROUP, PJ
    WETHERBEE, JN
    HOFFMANN, RG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 12 (03) : 739 - 745
  • [33] Direct defibrillation during cardiothoracic surgery is more effective with biphasic shocks than monophasic damped sine wave shocks
    Tacker, W
    Lazzara, R
    Bowdle, A
    Aldea, G
    Schmitt, P
    O'Grady, S
    Schwarz, B
    Mair, P
    Lindner, K
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 22 : 89 - 89
  • [34] Monophasic or biphasic defibrillation
    Boyd, R
    Ghosh, A
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2001, 18 (02) : 122 - 122
  • [35] Termination of spiral waves with biphasic shocks: Role of virtual electrode polarization
    Anderson, C
    Trayanova, N
    Skouibine, K
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (12) : 1386 - 1396
  • [36] Biphasic shocks compared with monophasic damped sine wave shocks for direct ventricular defibrillation during open heart surgery
    Schwarz, B
    Bowdle, TA
    Jett, GK
    Mair, P
    Lindner, KH
    Aldea, GS
    Lazzara, RG
    O'Grady, SG
    Schmitt, PW
    Walker, RG
    Chapman, FW
    Tacker, WA
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 98 (05) : 1063 - 1069
  • [37] Reduced arrhythmogenicity of biphasic versus monophasic T-wave shocks - Implications for defibrillation efficacy
    Behrens, S
    Li, CL
    Kirchhof, P
    Fabritz, FL
    Franz, MR
    CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (08) : 1974 - 1980
  • [38] Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: Implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold
    Behrens, S
    Li, CL
    Franz, MR
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (09): : 2179 - 2187
  • [39] Epicardial sock mapping following monophasic and biphasic shocks of equal voltage with an endocardial lead system
    Usui, M
    Callihan, RL
    Walker, RG
    Walcott, GP
    Rollins, DL
    Wolf, PD
    Smith, WM
    Ideker, RE
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 7 (04) : 322 - 334
  • [40] EFFECTS OF MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC SHOCKS ON ACTION-POTENTIALS DURING VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION IN DOGS
    ZHOU, XH
    WOLF, PD
    ROLLINS, DL
    AFEWORK, Y
    SMITH, WM
    IDEKER, RE
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1993, 73 (02) : 325 - 334