Wavefront termination with monophasic and biphasic shocks: A simulation study

被引:0
|
作者
Trayanova, N [1 ]
Bray, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This modeling study examines the effect of monophasic, and biphasic waveforms on the response of cardiac fiber to a defibrillation shock. Shocks of various strengths and coupling intervals (CIs) are delivered extracellularly during the relative refractory period. The results show that monophasic shock strengths of three times the diastolic threshold (DT) either elicit no response, or, for coupling intervals above 380ms, reinitiate propagation. In contrast, biphasic shocks of same strength are capable of terminating the existing wavefronts by invoking either a graded response (CIs 370 to 382ms) that prolongs the refractory period, or by inducing a propagation block (CIs above 400ms) that renders the fiber absolutely refractory. Biphasic shocks have only a small "vulnerable" window of coupling intervals over which propagation is reinitiated. Thus, the results obtained in this study offer a possible explanation of the mechanisms underlying the increased efficacy of biphasic defibrillation waveforms.
引用
收藏
页码:1289 / 1290
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transmembrane potential changes and action potential prolongation during monophasic and biphasic shocks
    Zhou, X
    Smith, WM
    Justice, RK
    Ideker, RE
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 29 (02) : 46127 - 46127
  • [22] FACTORS WHICH MAY EXPLAIN DIFFERENT DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLDS FOR MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC SHOCKS
    DILLON, SM
    WANG, T
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 64 (02) : A206 - A206
  • [23] Comparison of serial monophasic and biphasic shocks in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Mueller, Dirk
    Flaschar, Daniel
    Schnitzer, Luise
    Arntz, Hans-Richard
    CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (18) : 1199 - 1199
  • [24] External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation:: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks
    Ricard, P
    Lévy, S
    Boccara, G
    Lakhal, E
    Bardy, G
    EUROPACE, 2001, 3 (02): : 96 - 99
  • [25] Comparison of serial monophasic and biphasic shocks in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Mueller, D.
    Flaschar, D.
    Schnitzer, L.
    Arntz, H. -R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 468 - 468
  • [26] Biphasic and monophasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a meta analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Faddy, SC
    Powell, J
    Craig, JC
    RESUSCITATION, 2003, 58 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [27] Multicenter comparison of truncated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation
    Bardy, GH
    Marchlinski, FE
    Sharma, AD
    Worley, SJ
    Luceri, RM
    Yee, R
    Halperin, BD
    Fellows, CL
    Ahern, TS
    Chilson, DA
    Packer, DL
    Wilber, DJ
    Mattioni, TA
    Reddy, R
    Kronmal, RA
    Lazzara, R
    CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (10) : 2507 - 2514
  • [28] MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC SYNOVIAL SARCOMA - AN IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDY
    TSUJIMOTO, M
    UEDA, T
    NAKASHIMA, H
    HAMADA, H
    ISHIGURO, S
    AOZASA, K
    ACTA PATHOLOGICA JAPONICA, 1987, 37 (04): : 597 - 604
  • [29] The influence of sodium channel blockade on the defibrillation energy requirements of biphasic versus monophasic shocks
    Nelson, SD
    Lenhart, MB
    Saffarin, A
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 19 (11): : 1568 - 1573
  • [30] A randomized trial comparing monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
    Koster, RW
    Dorian, P
    Chapman, FW
    Schmitt, PW
    O'Grady, SG
    Walker, RG
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 147 (05) : e1 - e7