Modeling risk in a Design for Supply Chain problem

被引:30
|
作者
Claypool, Erin [1 ]
Norman, Bryan A. [1 ]
Needy, Kim LaScola [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Ind Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Dept Ind Engn, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Design for Supply Chain; Supplier Selection; New Product Development; Risk; MIP; Simulation; PRODUCT DESIGN; MANAGEMENT; CONFIGURATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2014.09.026
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The objective of Design for Supply Chain (DFSC) is to design a supply chain in parallel to designing a new product. Risk is an inherent element of this process. Although supply chain risk models and product development risk models are available, there are few models that consider the combined effect of risk to product development and the supply chain. This gap is filled by the development of a DFSC and risk model that looks at design, supply chain and risk concurrently. The model consists of two components. First, a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) model makes the DFSC decisions while simultaneously considering time-to-market risk, supplier reliability risk and strategic exposure risk. The results from the MIP are then used in the second model component which is a discrete event simulation. The simulation tests the robustness of the MIP solution for supplier capacity risk and demand risk. When a decision maker is potentially facing either of these risks the simulation shows whether it is best to use an alternative solution or proceed with the MIP solution. The model provides analytical results, but also allows decision makers to use their own judgment to select the best option for overall profitability. In conclusion, testing shows that risk mitigation strategies can and should be determined from the DFSC and risk model, but that they will be dependent on the specific design problem being solved. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 54
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DESIGN FOR SUPPLY CHAIN: EVALUATION OF SUPPLY CHAIN METRICS
    Manohar, Karthik
    Ishii, Kosuke
    IMECE2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, VOL 4, 2009, : 203 - 211
  • [42] A flexible robust model for blood supply chain network design problem
    Khalilpourazari, Soheyl
    Doulabi, Hossein Hashemi
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023, 328 (01) : 701 - 726
  • [43] Fuzzy Programming Approach to an Environmental Supply Chain Network Design Problem
    Ozceylan, Eren
    Pehlivan, Nimet Yapici
    Paksoy, Turan
    JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE-VALUED LOGIC AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 25 (01) : 81 - 103
  • [44] Collaborative hospital supply chain network design problem under uncertainty
    Dorgham, Khouloud
    Nouaouri, Issam
    Nicolas, Jean-Christophe
    Goncalves, Gilles
    OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (05) : 4607 - 4640
  • [45] Environmental monetization and risk assessment in supply chain design and planning
    da Silva, Catia
    Barbosa-Povoa, Ana Paula
    Carvalho, Ana
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 270
  • [46] Robust supply chain networks design and ambiguous risk preferences
    Yu, Guodong
    Li, Fei
    Yang, Yu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2017, 55 (04) : 1168 - 1182
  • [47] The impact of product design on supply chain risk: a case study
    Khan, Omera
    Christopher, Martin
    Burnes, Bernard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2008, 38 (5-6) : 412 - 432
  • [48] Hardware Design and Verification Techniques for Supply Chain Risk Mitigation
    Liu, Bao
    Jin, Yier
    Qu, Gang
    2015 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS (CAD/GRAPHICS), 2015, : 238 - 239
  • [49] A flexible robust model for blood supply chain network design problem
    Soheyl Khalilpourazari
    Hossein Hashemi Doulabi
    Annals of Operations Research, 2023, 328 : 701 - 726
  • [50] Global Supply Chain Network Design Incorporating Disruption Risk
    Rienkhemaniyom, Kanokporn
    Ravindran, A. Ravi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ANALYTICS, 2014, 1 (03) : 37 - 62