Modeling risk in a Design for Supply Chain problem

被引:30
|
作者
Claypool, Erin [1 ]
Norman, Bryan A. [1 ]
Needy, Kim LaScola [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Ind Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Dept Ind Engn, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Design for Supply Chain; Supplier Selection; New Product Development; Risk; MIP; Simulation; PRODUCT DESIGN; MANAGEMENT; CONFIGURATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2014.09.026
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The objective of Design for Supply Chain (DFSC) is to design a supply chain in parallel to designing a new product. Risk is an inherent element of this process. Although supply chain risk models and product development risk models are available, there are few models that consider the combined effect of risk to product development and the supply chain. This gap is filled by the development of a DFSC and risk model that looks at design, supply chain and risk concurrently. The model consists of two components. First, a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) model makes the DFSC decisions while simultaneously considering time-to-market risk, supplier reliability risk and strategic exposure risk. The results from the MIP are then used in the second model component which is a discrete event simulation. The simulation tests the robustness of the MIP solution for supplier capacity risk and demand risk. When a decision maker is potentially facing either of these risks the simulation shows whether it is best to use an alternative solution or proceed with the MIP solution. The model provides analytical results, but also allows decision makers to use their own judgment to select the best option for overall profitability. In conclusion, testing shows that risk mitigation strategies can and should be determined from the DFSC and risk model, but that they will be dependent on the specific design problem being solved. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 54
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multicriteria supply chain network equilibrium problem with supply side and demand side risk
    Wu, Xiaoceng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-RISK MANAGEMENT (ICERM 2008), 2008, : 128 - 133
  • [32] Risk management of supply chain disruptions: An epidemic modeling approach
    Berger, Niklas
    Schulze-Schwering, Stefan
    Long, Elisa
    Spinler, Stefan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 304 (03) : 1036 - 1051
  • [33] A critical review on supply chain risk - Definition, measure and modeling
    Heckmann, Iris
    Comes, Tina
    Nickel, Stefan
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 52 : 119 - 132
  • [34] Modeling information risk in supply chain using Bayesian networks
    Sharma, Satyendra
    Routroy, Srikanta
    JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2016, 29 (02) : 238 - 254
  • [35] Supply chain risk modeling by AHP and Fuzzy AHP methods
    Radivojevic, Gordana
    Gajovic, Vladimir
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2014, 17 (03) : 337 - 352
  • [36] Scenario-based Supply Chain Network risk modeling
    Klibi, Walid
    Martel, Alain
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (03) : 644 - 658
  • [37] Modeling and optimizing the integrated problem of closed-loop supply chain network design and disassembly line balancing
    Ozceylan, Eren
    Paksoy, Turan
    Bektas, Tolga
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2014, 61 : 142 - 164
  • [38] Modeling and mitigating supply chain disruptions as a bilevel network flow problem
    Glogg, Rene Y.
    Timonina-Farkas, Anna
    Seifrert, Ralf W.
    COMPUTATIONAL MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 19 (03) : 395 - 423
  • [39] Modeling and mitigating supply chain disruptions as a bilevel network flow problem
    René Y. Glogg
    Anna Timonina-Farkas
    Ralf W. Seifert
    Computational Management Science, 2022, 19 : 395 - 423
  • [40] Considering chain-to-chain competition on environmental and social concerns in a supply chain network design problem
    Nobari, Arash
    Kheirkhah, AmirSaman
    Esmaeili, Maryam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2019, 14 (01) : 33 - 46