Human-Robot Interaction and User Manipulation

被引:3
|
作者
Bertolini, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Carli, Rachele [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Scuola Super Sant Anna, DIRPOLIS Inst, Pisa, Italy
[2] Scuola Super Sant Anna, EURA European Ctr Excellence Regulat Robot & AI, Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Alma Mater Res Inst Human Ctr AI, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Luxembourg, AI RoboLab, ICR Grp, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
来源
关键词
Social robotics; Manipulation; Human dignity; MACHINES;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-98438-0_4
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The analysis presented is focused on the interaction among social robots and humans. It is here stated that, despite the multidisciplinary debate around the theme, social robots have to be ontologically deemed objects. The pleasant design and the simulation of intelligence, as much as social and emotional competences, are useful to convey acceptability and to favour interaction. However, they may lead to forms ofmanipulation which can impact the users' will and undermine their physical and psychological integrity. This rises the need of a legal framework, able to guarantee a really human-centred development of new technologies and to ensure the protection of people involved in the interaction. Therefore, the recent European proposal of regulation, the Artificial Intelligence Act, is examined. In particular, the section on prohibited practices is critically analysed, so as to highlight the controversial aspects of such an approach. Thus, it is suggested the role of human dignity as a balancing principle to address the issues related to user manipulation in the human-robot interaction domain.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 57
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Participatory Design and End-User Programming for Human-Robot Interaction
    Senft, Emmanuel
    Porfirio, David
    Winkle, Katie
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 17TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI '22), 2022, : 1290 - 1292
  • [42] Impact of trajectory profiles on user stress in close human-robot interaction
    Kuehnlenz, Barbara
    Erhart, Maximilian
    Kainert, Marcel
    Wang, Zhi-Qiao
    Wilm, Julian
    Kuehnlenz, Kolja
    AT-AUTOMATISIERUNGSTECHNIK, 2018, 66 (06) : 483 - 491
  • [43] REVISITING THE END USER'S PERSPECTIVE IN COLLABORATIVE HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION
    Kildal, Johan
    Maurtua, Inaki
    ADVANCES IN COOPERATIVE ROBOTICS, 2017, : 196 - 204
  • [44] Human-robot embodied interaction in hallway settings: a pilot user study
    Pacchierotti, E
    Christensen, HI
    Jensfelt, P
    2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (RO-MAN), 2005, : 164 - 171
  • [45] Handling uncertain input in multi-user human-robot interaction
    Keizer, Simon
    Foster, Mary Ellen
    Gaschler, Andre
    Giuliani, Manuel
    Isard, Amy
    Lemon, Oliver
    2014 23RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (IEEE RO-MAN), 2014, : 312 - 317
  • [46] Evaluation of User Experience in Human-Robot Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review
    Apraiz, Ainhoa
    Lasa, Ganix
    Mazmela, Maitane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2023, 15 (02) : 187 - 210
  • [47] On Interaction Quality in Human-Robot Interaction
    Bensch, Suna
    Jevtic, Aleksandar
    Hellstrom, Thomas
    ICAART: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 1, 2017, : 182 - 189
  • [48] A Model for Human-Human Collaborative Object Manipulation and Its Application to Human-Robot Interaction
    Noohi, Ehsan
    Zefran, Milos
    Patton, James L.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS, 2016, 32 (04) : 880 - 896
  • [49] The Effect of Multiple Robot Interaction on Human-Robot Interaction
    Yang, Jeong-Yean
    Kwon, Dong-Soo
    2012 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UBIQUITOUS ROBOTS AND AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE (URAL), 2012, : 30 - 33
  • [50] Human-Robot Proxemics: Physical and Psychological Distancing in Human-Robot Interaction
    Mumm, Jonathan
    Mutlu, Bilge
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTIONS (HRI 2011), 2011, : 331 - 338