Human-Robot Proxemics: Physical and Psychological Distancing in Human-Robot Interaction

被引:255
|
作者
Mumm, Jonathan [1 ]
Mutlu, Bilge [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Comp Sci, 1210 W Dayton St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Human-robot interaction; humanlike robots; proxemics; distancing; gaze; proximity; disclosure; Wakamaru; GAZE;
D O I
10.1145/1957656.1957786
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
To seamlessly integrate into the human physical and social environment, robots must display appropriate proxemic behavior-that is, follow societal norms in establishing their physical and psychological distancing with people. Social-scientific theories suggest competing models of human proxemic behavior, but all conclude that individuals' proxemic behavior is shaped by the proxemic behavior of others and the individual's psychological closeness to them. The present study explores whether these models can also explain how people physically and psychologically distance themselves from robots and suggest guidelines for future design of proxemic behaviors for robots. In a controlled laboratory experiment, participants interacted with Wakamaru to perform two tasks that examined physical and psychological distancing of the participants. We manipulated the likeability (likeable/dislikeable) and gaze behavior (mutual gaze/averted gaze) of the robot. Our results on physical distancing showed that participants who disliked the robot compensated for the increase in the robot's gaze by maintaining a greater physical distance from the robot, while participants who liked the robot did not differ in their distancing from the robot across gaze conditions. The results on psychological distancing suggest that those who disliked the robot also disclosed less to the robot. Our results offer guidelines for the design of appropriate proxemic behaviors for robots so as to facilitate effective human-robot interaction.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 338
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using Proxemics to Evaluate Human-Robot Interaction
    Feil-Seifer, David
    Mataric, Maja
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI 2010), 2010, : 143 - 144
  • [2] A Review on Human-Robot Proxemics
    Samarakoon, S. M. Bhagya P.
    Muthugala, M. A. Viraj J.
    Jayasekara, A. G. Buddhika P.
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (16)
  • [3] Learning Proxemics for Personalized Human-Robot Social Interaction
    Patompak, Pakpoom
    Jeong, Sungmoon
    Nilkhamhang, Itthisek
    Chong, Nak Young
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2020, 12 (01) : 267 - 280
  • [4] Perceptual Models of Human-Robot Proxemics
    Mead, Ross
    Mataric, Maja J.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ROBOTICS, 2016, 109 : 261 - 276
  • [5] Psychological analysis on human-robot interaction
    Kanda, T
    Ishiguro, H
    Ishida, T
    [J]. 2001 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS I-IV, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 4166 - 4173
  • [6] Psychological problems of human-robot interaction
    Velichkovsky, B. B.
    Zankovsky, A. N.
    [J]. VOPROSY PSIKHOLOGII, 2021, (03) : 138 - +
  • [7] An atlas of physical human-robot interaction
    De Santis, Agostino
    Siciliano, Bruno
    De Luca, Alessandro
    Bicchi, Antonio
    [J]. MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2008, 43 (03) : 253 - 270
  • [8] Intuitive Physical Human-Robot Interaction
    Badeau, Nicolas
    Gosselin, Clement
    Foucault, Simon
    Laliberte, Thierry
    Abdallah, Muhammad E.
    [J]. IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 2018, 25 (02) : 28 - 38
  • [9] Physical and Social Human-robot Interaction
    Metta, Giorgio
    [J]. UMAP'20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ACM CONFERENCE ON USER MODELING, ADAPTATION AND PERSONALIZATION, 2020, : 3 - 3
  • [10] A robot for overground physical human-robot interaction experiments
    Regmi, Sambad
    Burns, Devin
    Song, Yun Seong
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (11):