Comparison of culture, polymerase chain reaction, and fluorescent in situ hybridization for detection of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and "Brachyspira hampsonii" in pig feces

被引:10
|
作者
Wilberts, Bailey L. [1 ]
Warneke, Hallie L. [2 ]
Bower, Leslie P. [2 ]
Kinyon, Joann M. [2 ]
Burrough, Eric R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Vet Pathol, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Vet Diagnost & Prod Anim Med, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
Brachyspira; fluorescent in situ hybridization; swine dysentery; TREPONEMA-HYODYSENTERIAE; SELECTIVE MEDIUM; SWINE; SPP;
D O I
10.1177/1040638714563064
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Swine dysentery is characterized by mucohemorrhagic diarrhea and can occur following infection by Brachyspira hyodysenteriae or Brachyspira hampsonii. A definitive diagnosis is often based on the isolation of strongly beta-hemolytic spirochetes from selective culture or by the application of species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays directly to feces. While culture is highly sensitive, it typically requires 6 or more days to complete, and PCR, although rapid, can be limited by fecal inhibition. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has been described in formalin-fixed tissues; however, completion requires approximately 2 days. Because of the time constraints of available assays, a same-day FISH assay was developed to detect B. hyodysenteriae and B. hampsonii in pig feces using previously described oligonucleotide probes Hyo1210 and Hamp1210 for B. hyodysenteriae and B. hampsonii, respectively. In situ hybridization was simultaneously compared with culture and PCR on feces spiked with progressive dilutions of spirochetes to determine the threshold of detection for each assay at 0 and 48 hr. The PCR assay on fresh feces and FISH on formalin-fixed feces had similar levels of detection. Culture was the most sensitive method, detecting the target spirochetes at least 2 log-dilutions less when compared to other assays 48 hr after sample preparation. Fluorescent in situ hybridization also effectively detected both target species in formalin-fixed feces from inoculated pigs as part of a previous experiment. Accordingly, FISH on formalin-fixed feces from clinically affected pigs can provide same-day identification and preliminary speciation of spirochetes associated with swine dysentery in North America.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 46
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARISON OF HPV DETECTION IN CLINICAL BIOPSIES BY NONISOTOPIC INSITU HYBRIDIZATION AND THE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION
    GRAHAM, AK
    HERRINGTON, CS
    FLANNERY, DMJ
    EVANS, MF
    MCGEE, JO
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1991, 163 (02): : A154 - A154
  • [32] Comparison of procedures for the detection of enteroviruses in murine heart samples by in situ polymerase chain reaction
    Berger, MM
    See, DM
    Redl, B
    Aymard, M
    Lina, B
    RESEARCH IN VIROLOGY, 1997, 148 (06): : 409 - 416
  • [33] Development of polymerase chain reaction and comparison with in situ hybridization for the detection of Haemophilus parasuis in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues
    Jung, K
    Ha, Y
    Kim, SH
    Chae, C
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 66 (07): : 841 - 845
  • [34] EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUS-ASSOCIATED GASTRIC CARCINOMA IN BRAZIL: COMPARISON BETWEEN IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION AND POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION DETECTION
    Pereira de Lima, Marcos Antonio
    Pitombeira Ferreira, Marcia Valeria
    Pessoa Barros, Marcos Aurelio
    de Moura Campos Pardini, Maria Ines
    Ferrasi, Adriana Camargo
    Barem Rabenhorst, Silvia Helena
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 43 (01) : 393 - 404
  • [35] Comparison of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detection of chromosome 1p loss in gliomas.
    Staugaitis, SM
    Chernova, OB
    Warshawsky, I
    Castilla, EA
    Prayson, RA
    Barnett, GH
    Tubbs, RR
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPATHOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2002, 61 (05): : 452 - 452
  • [36] Sex determination by simultaneous application of polymerase chain reaction and fluorescent in situ hybridization on the same blastomere of a pre-embryo
    Sasabe, Y
    Stehlik, EF
    Krisher, RL
    Katayama, KP
    Stehlik, JC
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 66 (03) : 490 - 492
  • [37] QUANTITATION OF POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION PRODUCTS BY HYBRIDIZATION-BASED ASSAYS WITH FLUORESCENT, COLORIMETRIC, OR CHEMILUMINESCENT DETECTION
    VLIEGER, AM
    MEDENBLIK, AMJC
    VANGIJLSWIJK, RPM
    TANKE, HJ
    VANDERPLOEG, M
    GRATAMA, JW
    RAAP, AK
    ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1992, 205 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [38] Rapid detection of Salmonella from poultry by real-time polymerase chain reaction with fluorescent hybridization probes
    Eyigor, A
    Carli, KT
    AVIAN DISEASES, 2003, 47 (02) : 380 - 386
  • [39] Comparison of polymerase chain reaction assay with culture for detection of genital mycoplasmas in perinatal infections
    Luki N.
    Lebel P.
    Boucher M.
    Doray B.
    Turgeon J.
    Brousseau R.
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 1998, 17 (4): : 255 - 263
  • [40] COMPARISON OF POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION AND CULTURE TECHNIQUES FOR DETECTION OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS
    TABRIZI, SN
    LEES, MI
    GARLAND, SM
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 1993, 7 (05) : 357 - 360